Ficus obovata Pittier. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.711.3.1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16715950 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4C1887FD-FF90-FFEE-07E0-E1B23774A73F |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Ficus obovata Pittier. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat. |
| status |
|
180. Ficus obovata Pittier. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat. View in CoL 4(30): 77. 1937, nom. illeg., non Griffith (1854: 390). TYPE:— VENEZUELA. Trujillo: near Escuque , 10 January 1929, H. Pittier 13128 (lectotype, designated here: VEN–368 [digital image!]; isolectotypes: A–00034527!, G–00438330 [digital image!], MO–204172!, PH–00014276!, SI–002709 [digital image!], US –00090171!).
Nomenclatural notes:— Pittier (1937) described this taxon based on Pittier 13128, but did not specify a herbarium, thus making all specimens of that gathering syntypes (ICN, Art. 40.2 Note 1). Berg (2009) cited a “ holotype ” at VEN, but since this happened after 1 January 2001 and he did not use the term “designated here” or an equivalent statement as required by Art. 7.11, his citation did not constitute an effective designation of a lectotype. We designate VEN368 as the lectotype because it represents the most complete and diagnostic specimen.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Ficus obovata Pittier. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat.
| Mitidieri-Rivera, Nicole, Damián-Parizaca, Alexander, Gardner, Elliot M., Plata-Castro, Angelo D., Zerega, Nyree J. C. & Pederneiras, Leandro C. 2025 |
Ficus obovata Pittier. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat.
| 1937: 77 |