Tekellina zhangziqingi Yao, Liu & Lin, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1248.150650 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FF3B1BFB-E911-431A-A3B9-D8FA63BAE550 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16738681 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4931A380-A44E-5AE8-9A8E-40A3EC39A6A0 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Tekellina zhangziqingi Yao, Liu & Lin |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tekellina zhangziqingi Yao, Liu & Lin sp. nov.
Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7 , 8 B Common Chinese name: 张子清特克蛛 View Figure 8
Type material.
Holotype: ♂, CHINA: • Jiangxi Prov., Ji’an City, Jinggangshan County Level City, Ciping Town, Jinggangshan Nature Reserve, Huangyangjie Scenic Spot , 26°38'9.6"N, 114°6'E, 1080 m a. s. l., 3.VIII.2014, K. K. Liu et al. leg. ( Syn-02 , ASM-JGSU) GoogleMaps ; Paratypes: • 1 ♀, same nature reserve, Zhufeng Scenic Spot , 26°31'58.8"N, 114°8'31.2"E, 708 m a. s. l., 1.VIII.2014, K. K. Liu et al. leg. ( Syn-02 , ASM-JGSU) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, 17.VI.2025, Z. J. Wang and C. Z. Li leg. ( ASM-JGSU -Ara-4501 ), other data same as holotype GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
The male of the species resembles that of T. helixicis ( Gao and Li 2014: 90, figs 72 A, 74 A, B) in having the enlarged and thumb-shaped paracymbium and the finger-like terminal claw-like arm of the conductor, but can be easily separated from it by the mesal arm of conductor with an identical median ridge and terminal lamellar process (vs. absent) (Figs 5 A View Figure 5 , 7 A, B View Figure 7 ). The females can be easily distinguished from T. helixicis ( Gao and Li 2014: 90, figs 71 C, D, 73 A, B) by the course of the loosely-spiral copulatory ducts surrounding the spermathecae (vs. tightly), the course of the copulatory ducts not reaching the apical part of the spermathecae (vs. reaching) and the spermathecae distally convergent (vs. nearly parallel) (Figs 5 B View Figure 5 , 6 C View Figure 6 ).
Description.
Male (holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 4 A, B View Figure 4 . Total length 1.15, carapace 0.46 long, 0.42 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig. 4 A View Figure 4 ): AME 0.06, ALE 0.05, PME 0.06, PLE 0.06, AME - AME 0.04, AME - ALE 0.01, PME - PME 0.03, PME - PLE 0.02, AME - PME 0.03, AME - PLE 0.06, ALE - ALE 0.1, PLE - PLE 0.03, ALE - PLE 0.01. MOA 0.13 long, front width 0.14, back width 0.14. Labium 3 times wider than long. Sternum (Fig. 4 B View Figure 4 ) shield-shaped, slightly longer than wide. Legs (Fig. 4 A, B View Figure 4 ): with neatly short setae; measurements: I missing; II 1.69 (0.49, 0.19, 0.45, 0.36, 0.2); III 1.29 (0.41, 0.16, 0.28, 0.22, 0.22); IV 1.57 (0.52, 0.14, 0.4, 0.29, 0.22). Abdomen (Fig. 4 A, B View Figure 4 ) 2.52 long, 2.62 wide.
Coloration (Fig. 4 A, B View Figure 4 ). Carapace yellowish to brown. Chelicerae, endites, labium and sternum transparent to yellowish. Legs yellowish to yellow. Abdomen white to yellowish, with several white spots.
Palp (Figs 5 A View Figure 5 , 7 A, B View Figure 7 ). Paracymbium thumb-shaped. Conductor Y-shaped. Terminal claw of the conductor finger-like, approaching the hollow paracymbium. Mesal arm of the conductor stubby, narrow lamellar, with a truncated tip and not reaching the terminal claw of the conductor. Embolus filamentous and coiling, with four spirals.
Female (paratype). Habitus as in Fig. 4 C, D View Figure 4 , 6 A, B View Figure 6 . As in male, except as noted. Total length 1.18, carapace 0.39 long, 0.29 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 , 6 A View Figure 6 ): AME 0.05, ALE 0.5, PME 0.06, PLE 0.06, AME - AME 0.05, AME - ALE 0.02, PME - PME 0.03, PME - PLE 0.02, AME - PME 0.05, AME - PLE 0.08, ALE - ALE 0.18, PLE - PLE 0.21, ALE - PLE 0.02. MOA 0.14 long, front width 0.13, back width 0.15. Sternum with sparse setae. Legs (Fig. 4 C, D View Figure 4 , 6 A, B View Figure 6 ): measurements: I 1.57 (0.46, 0.18, 0.32, 0.29, 0.32); II 1.87 (0.62, 0.2, 0.56, 0.28, 0.21); III 1.43 (0.48, 0.13, 0.31, 0.29, 0.22); IV 1.77 (0.56, 0.16, 0.47, 0.32, 0.26). Abdomen (Fig. 4 C, D View Figure 4 , 6 A, B View Figure 6 ) 0.79 long, 0.58 wide.
Coloration (Figs 4 C, D View Figure 4 , 6 A, B View Figure 6 ). Darker than males. Sometimes, the eyes with black annulations.
Epigyne (Fig. 5 B View Figure 5 ). Epigynal plate wider than long, weakly sclerotized and translucent. Copulatory openings separated by distance 2 × maximum spermathecal diameter. Copulatory ducts long, loose spirals surrounding spermathecae, not reaching the apical part of spermathecae. Fertilization ducts short, curved forward to mesal, directed medially. Spermathecae convergent, widely separate, constriction nearly 5: 5.
Note.
Fig. 5 A View Figure 5 was imaged under a cover slip, thus altering the spatial relationship between the mesal arm of the conductor and the terminal claw of the conductor. However, the SEM images (in natural state) in Fig. 7 View Figure 7 clearly demonstrate that the mesal arm of the conductor does not reach the terminal claw of the conductor. And in our newly collected paratype (Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ), the female spermatheca also exhibits a significantly greater inclination angle than in T. huihangi , confirming this as a conspecific pairing rather than a variant.
Habitat.
In the low shrubs (Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ).
Distribution.
Known only from Jiangxi Province, China.
Etymology.
The species is named in honor of Zi-Qing Zhang, one of the famous figures of the extremely hard and bitter struggle in Jinggangshan; noun (name) in genitive case.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |