Eupelmus iris Fusu & Gibson, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5665.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF6D94E4-C736-45CB-BC6E-1CD97173DC13 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16609532 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/466D7804-FFF1-877B-FF17-FC17FCA0FA8B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eupelmus iris Fusu & Gibson, 2016 |
status |
|
4.1 Eupelmus iris Fusu & Gibson, 2016 View in CoL , n. rec.
Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8
Eupelmus (Eupelmus) iris Fusu & Gibson, 2016: 127–131 View in CoL View Cited Treatment .
Material examined. CHINA: 1♀, Goudunping, Fujian Tianbaoyan National Natural Reserve, Sanming City , Fujian Province, 9 October 2020, Malaise trap, DNA 848 ( FAFU) .
Distribution. * China (* Fujian), Japan.
Remarks. Females of E. iris resemble those of E. tachardiae (Howard) and E. xenium Fusu & Gibson , but females of both of the latter two species have a vertexal carina, which is absent from E. iris females ( Fig. 8C View FIGURE 8 ). Additionally, as described by Gibson & Fusu (2016), our specimen has quite a dark scape with a metallic luster, though noticeably lighter orangey-brown mediolongitudinally on the inner surface ( Fig. 8D,E View FIGURE 8 ). In contrast, the scape of E. xenium is entirely yellow or extensively pale.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eupelmus iris Fusu & Gibson, 2016
Li, Zixuan, Xu, Shirui, Wang, Zongying, Chen, Pengfei, Wu, Jianqin & Peng, Lingfei 2025 |