Trochida
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2024.64.031 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4008878E-FFCE-A82F-8BCC-DBF6FDA2FC41 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trochida |
status |
|
Order Trochida View in CoL View at ENA Superfamily Trochoidea
Family Calliostomatidae Genus Calliostoma Swainson, 1840
Calliostoma soror Simone & Dornellas , new species ( Figs. 5-6 View Figure 5 View Figure 6 ) https://zoobank.org/ CDE3E0AC-2CEB-47BA-998B-EEDB2896B840
Types: Holotype MZSP 121819 View Materials , spm . Paratypes: MZSP 166230 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell with same data as holotype, MZSP114401 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell from type locality (Abbate col., 15.vii.2013) ; BRAZIL. Espírito Santo; Trindade (Oceanic) Island, Enseada do Lixo ( Paredão ), 20°31′29.8″S 29°19′43.9″W, 15.4 m, MZSP 121827 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell (J.B. MendonÇa col., 04.xi.2014), Andradas , 20°28′47.69″S 29°18′24.03″W, MZSP 104811 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell (C.H. Guimarães col., 23.i.2012), coast between Andradas and Tartagugas, 20°30′11.85″S 29°19′11.79″W, MZSP 136531 View Materials , 1 View Materials spm (J.B. MendonÇa col., 05.xi.2013) GoogleMaps .
Type locality: BRAZIL. Espírito Santo ; Trindade Island, Farol , 20°29′52.3″S 29°19′15.6″W [Joel Braga MendonÇa col., 08.iv.2014] GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis: Trindade species with ~ 10 mm of adult shell and suture well-marked. Sculptured by spiral cords composed of successive nodes; cords interspaces smooth, equivalent to cords width. Umbilicus mostly closed. Epipodium with papillated edge, and 5 tentacles in left side,with tentacle 2 bifid. Osphradium small. Radula with narrow and tall rachidian, with sharp pointed, curved tip; robust lateral teeth.
Description: Shell ( Figs. 5 View Figure 5 A-E, H-M, 6A-D) about 10 mm; trochiform, as tall as wide. Walls thick, iridescent inside ( Fig. 5A, K View Figure 5 ). Color light orange-brown; with small brown spots, as wide as spiral cords, relatively densely distributed in some specimens, joined with some axial white bands ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 H-J), similar pattern, but more scantly distributed in other specimens ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 A-C); white bands absent with scanty brown minute spots in other specimens ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 A-C), up to some specimens practically unicolor ( Fig.5 View Figure 5 K-M),with only some scanty spots in inferior surface; umbilicus always white ( Figs. 5C, J, M View Figure 5 , 6C View Figure 6 ). Protoconch usually dark brown, protruded, with 1 whorl, of ~ 0.5 mm; first 0.5 whorl smooth, last 0.5 whorl with strong, successive axial threads ( Figs. 5D, E View Figure 5 , 6D View Figure 6 ). Spire with angle ~70, teleoconch of ~7 convex whorls; suture relatively deep, performing angle ~150°. Sculpture of punctuated spiral cords, 7 in penultimate whorl; smooth interspaces, with same width as cords; each cord composed of successive, aligned hemispheric punctuations, very evident in most specimens ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 A-E, K-L), but in rare cases cords slightly smooth in last whorl, being punctuated in spire and in inferior surface ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 A-C); last whorl with ~25 spiral cords.Aperture rounded,occupying ~45% of shell width, ~36% of shell height; prosogyre, ~30° with longitudinal axis. Outer lip with cutting edge, undulating reflecting spiral sculpture. Inner lip with strong vertical rafter as edge, flanked by shallow ( Fig. 5A, H View Figure 5 ) to relatively deep ( Figs. 5K View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 ) furrow; remaining as smooth callus. Umbilicus usually totally occluded by callus ( Fig. 5C, J View Figure 5 ) more rarely with shallow concavity ( Fig. 5M View Figure 5 ), still rarer with deeper concavity ( Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ).
Operculum ( Fig. 5F, G View Figure 5 ): Rounded, highly multispiral, nucleus central; margin flexiclaudent, fragile; inner surface glossy. Head-foot of ~½ whorl ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 F-G), head as wide as foot; ommatophores (om) elongated, with dark eye at tip; cephalic tentacles (te) located just dorsal to ommatophores, tapering uniformly. Snout (sn) of ⅙ whorl. Foot large (~75% of head-foot volume), pigmented by light brown, with small white spots; cephalic flaps (cf) relatively small, simple; epipodium as short fold, with papillated edge ( Fig. 6H View Figure 6 : ep), bearing 4 right, and 5 left epipodial tentacles ( Figs. 6F View Figure 6 : 1-5, G: 1-4), each tentacle simple, tapering uniformly up to pointed tip, anterior tentacle as largest; second left tentacle small, white, bifid. Columellar muscle (cm) of 1.5 whorl, right posterior side slightly longer ( Fig. 6H View Figure 6 ). Opercular pad ( Fig. 6H View Figure 6 : op) in middle level of dorsal foot surface.
Pallial cavity of ~ ⅕ whorl ( Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ). Gill very elongat- ed, posterior half of uniform width, anterior half tapering gradually up to bluntly pointed tip. Gill suspensory stalk (gs) with almost half of gill length. Osphradium (os) small, located in base of gill suspensory stalk. Rectum (rt) narrow, simple, full of fecal matter. Anus (an) siphoned (non-sessile), located posterior from mantle edge, close to right limit of mantle cavity.
Radula ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 I-K) about twice odontophore length. Rachidian occupying ~10% of radular ribbon width, ~twice longer than wide; stem rectangular; tip strongly curved inwards, tapering up to sharp pointed tip, having minute secondary cusps at both edges. Lateral teeth as 5 pairs ( Fig. 6J View Figure 6 ), base wide, oval, ~ ⅓ of rachidian width; abrupt diminishing in long, flattened rod, as long as rachidian; narrow, arched inwards, tip sharp pointed; distal half of this rod with both edges bearing aligned small secondary cusps, each secondary cusp barb-like, minute, very narrow and pointed. Marginal teeth with ~35 pairs ( Fig. 6I, K View Figure 6 ), mote central teeth ~twice longer than rachidian, ~ ⅓ its width; elongated, ~10-times longer than wide; basal 80% weakly arched, tip 20% strongly arched inwards,slightly broader, with both edged bearing 12-15 pairs of secondary cusps, each cusp triangular, ~3-times longer than wide in base, located close from each other; marginal row strongly arched, teeth gradually diminishing towards edges, more marginal teeth ~ ⅓ size of more central teeth; inner set of cusps slightly longer than outer set of cusps.
Etymology: The specific epithet is based on the Latin word soror , meaning sister, in allusion in being sister species of C. depictum Dall, 1927 from the mainland coast.
Distribution: Endemic of Brazilian oceanic islands of Trindade and Martin Vaz.
Habitat: on rocks, from intertidal up to ~ 10 m, usually found by diving.
Measurements (W, H in mm): Holotype MZSP 121819 ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 A-C):8.3 by 8.3. Paratypes:MZSP 121827 ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 H-J): 9.9 by 10.0; 114401 ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 K-M): 7.7 by 7.9; 104811 ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 A-C): 10.5 by 9.3.
Additional material examined: BRAZIL. Espírito Santo; Trindade(Oceanic)Island, PontadaCalheta, 20°30′18.72″S 29°18′31.67″W, MZSP 136733 View Materials , 4 View Materials spm (J.B. MendonÇa col., 25.vi.2015), 20°30′28.3″S 29°18′38.8″W, MZSP 104780 View Materials , 4 View Materials shells (C.H. Guimarães col., 10.ii.2012), Tartaruga, 20°31′03.93″S 29°18′08.45″W, MZSP 104150 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell (C.H. Guimarães col., 27.ii.2012), Andradas , 20°30′45.7″S 29°18′21.9″W, MZSP 140568 View Materials , 6 View Materials shells (J.B. MendonÇa col., 21.vii.2013), 20°28′47.69″S 29°18′24.03″W, MZSP 105364 View Materials , 1 View Materials spm (06.ii.2012), Enseada do Lixo , 20°31′43.5″S 29°19′28.1″W, MZSP 105380 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell (21.ix.2012), Farrilhões, 20°31′22.4″S 29°19′52.0″W, MZSP 115734 View Materials , 2 View Materials spm (08.vii.2013), off E of, 20°30′15″S 29°18′22″W, 8 m, MZSP 101197 View Materials , 1 View Materials shell (23.vii.2011) GoogleMaps ; Ilha de Martin Vaz, West coast, 20°28′32.32″S 28°52′00.38″W (23.vii.2013), MZSP 115412 View Materials , 4 View Materials shells, MZSP 115403 View Materials , 1 View Materials spm GoogleMaps .
Remarks: the present species I coauthored with Ana Paula S. Dornellas [Universidade Federal de Sergipe, E-mail: dornellas.anapaula@gmail.com], a Vetigastropoda specialist. Calliostoma soror is only similar to C. depictum in the Brazilian region,as both species have deep suture,relatively small size, and the shell color pattern. Calliostoma soror possibly is derived from an isolated C. depictum population that reached the remote Trindade Island, or both species are derived from the same calliostomatids branch. Calliostoma depictum was recently reviewed, including anatomical aspects, which facilitates the present comparison ( Dornellas & Simone, 2013). Only some details distinguish both species. Calliostoma soror has its shell with the spiral cords entirely composed of successive nodes, this does not occur in C. depictum , except for its first whorls, but the nodes fuse with each other, producing smooth spiral cords at least in the last two worlds ( Dornellas & Simone,2013); C.soror has punctuated spiral cords um to the last whorl. A single exception was found ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 A-C), but the smooth spiral cords are restricted to last whorl and to superior region only.The spiral arrangement of nodes in C. soror in first whorls are coarser and fewer than that of C. depictum , in the third whorl, for example, C. soror has 4 spiral cords, while C. depictum has 5. The suture of C. soror is usually shallower, while that of C. depictum usually is deeper.The umbilicus of C. soror is closed in most specimens ( Fig. 5C, J View Figure 5 ), slightly opened umbilicus is exceptional; wile C. depictum the umbilicus is always deep. Related to the anatomy, C. soror differs in having 5 epipodial tentacles in left side, with the tentacle 2 bifid ( Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ), while C. depictum has 4 epipodial tentacles in both sides. The epipodium edge is entirely papillated in C. soror ( Fig. 6H View Figure 6 : ep), while it is smooth in C. depictum . The projected portion of the gill and of the anus of C. soror ( Fig. 6E View Figure 6 : an, gs) are longer than those of C. depictum . The osphradium of C. soror ( Fig. 6E View Figure 6 : os) is very small if compared to that of C. depictum ( Dornellas & Simone, 2013: fig. 79). The radula of C. soror ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 I-K) adds more distinctions if compared to that of C.depictum ( Dornellas & Simone, 2013: figs. 48-50); the rachidian of C. soror is much narrower and longer, with a terminal tip much more pointed than that of the other species; the lateral teeth of C. soror are more robust, while those of C. depictum are almost filiform; the marginal teeth are similar in shape, but differ in number, being mush more abundant, ~50 pairs. There is no other Calliostoma species in which C. soror can be confused.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.