Paracratis borealis (Jeffreys, 1869)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2024.64.031 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4008878E-FF81-A86C-88FA-DCB6FACFFEC1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paracratis borealis (Jeffreys, 1869) |
status |
|
Paracratis borealis (Jeffreys, 1869) View in CoL revalidated, new combination ( Fig. 48F View Figure 48 )
Limopsis borealis Jeffreys, 1869: 174-175 View in CoL .
Limopsis minuta View in CoL : Maury, 1920: 43; Poirier, 1954: 148; Rios, 1975: 195 (pl. 62, fig. 952), 1985: 211 (pl. 76 fig. 1075), 1994: 233 (pl. 81, fig. 1152), 2009: 478 (fig. 1345); Gofas et al., 2001: 206; Janssen & Krylova, 2014: 56; Janssen, 2015: 16, 25; Molluscabase, 2024; Passos et al., 2024: 28 View Cited Treatment (non Philippi, 1836).
Type localities: 50 miles N of Hebrides, 189 fms. E Nordland, 70-100 fms. Upper Norway, 450 fms.
Remarks: Paracratis borealis ( Fig. 48F View Figure 48 ) has previously been identified as Limopsis minuta , described by Philippi as Pectunculus minutus in 1836 (pg. 63, pl. 5, fig. 3) ( Fig. 48E View Figure 48 ). This species was initially described from the Plio-Pleistocene deposits in Sicily, Italy (Mediterranean). It has been reported as present in the Recent period from Canada to Mexico, with some disjunct occurrences in South Brazil (e.g., Rios, 2009).
Despite the significant temporal and regional differences, which might suggest a strong case for specific separation, Limopsis minuta , as described and illustrat- ed by Philippi (1836), still exhibits conchological distinctions ( Fig. 48E View Figure 48 ). It is notably larger, reaching around 15 mm, whereas P. borealis measures approximately 6 mm. Furthermore, Limopsis minuta features a more arched hinge and a taller umbo compared to those of P. borealis ( Fig. 48F View Figure 48 ). The shell outline is also much less inclined (around 80°), while P. borealis has an angulation of approximately 65°.
Based on these temporal, geographic, and morphological differences, the most appropriate taxonomical procedure is to maintain Limopsis minuta as a Plio-Pleistocene Italian fossil within the genus Paracratis . Concurrently, its previous synonym, P.borealis , should be revalidated to represent the Recent Atlantic species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paracratis borealis (Jeffreys, 1869)
Simone, Luiz Ricardo L. 2024 |
Limopsis minuta
Passos, F. D. & Batistao, A. R. & Lima, L. L. C. 2024: 28 |
Janssen, R. 2015: 16 |
Janssen, R. & Krylova, E. M. 2014: 56 |
Gofas, S. & Renard, J. L. & Bouchet, P. 2001: 206 |
Rios, E. C. 1975: 195 |
Poirier, H. P. 1954: 148 |
Maury, C. J. 1920: 43 |