Gerbillus (Dipodillus) dasyurus (Wagner, 1842)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5580.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D0A37EA-8D5B-44D9-B2CC-8161D1E4AF54 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15121270 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3874162A-7E71-FFF8-FF42-FAB4B29A1533 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gerbillus (Dipodillus) dasyurus (Wagner, 1842) |
status |
|
22. Wagner’s Gerbil, Gerbillus (Dipodillus) dasyurus (Wagner, 1842) View in CoL
(IUCN Red List: LC)
Subspecies: G. d. palmyrae Lehmann, 1966, G. d. leosollicitus Lehmann, 1966 and G. d. dasyroides (Nehring, 1901).
Distribution: Common to semi-arid steppes and plains. It was recorded in rocky areas, open plains, and on banks of the Barada River ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ).
Previous records: Vicinity of Aleppo, Deir Al-Hajar, and Palmyra ( Lehmann 1966; Kumerloeve 1975), southeast steppe ( Harrison & Bates 1991), and Karahta, Ain Arab, and Sakra ( Shehab et al. 2018).
Recent record: Adra (2020).
Remarks: The name used by earlier authors was Dipodillus (Petteromys) dasyurus (Wagner, 1842) . Several subspecies were recognized in the past: G. d. palmyrae Lehmann, 1966 described from Palmyra, G. d. leosollicitus Lehmann, 1966 from Deir Al-Hajar near Damascus and the vicinity of Aleppo ( Lehmann 1966), and G. d. dasyroides (Nehring, 1901) from the southeastern steppes. Colour of the dorsal pelage varies in a mosaic manner, matching soil colour and other environmental factors ( Harrison & Bates 1991). However, Burgin et al. (2020) reported Wagner’s gerbil as a monotypic species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.