Uca crassipes ( Adams & White, 1848 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.198567 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3506037 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/33570C78-FFE9-FF82-FF0F-FDCBD8EEFA78 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Uca crassipes ( Adams & White, 1848 ) |
| status |
|
Uca crassipes ( Adams & White, 1848) View in CoL
Gelasimus crassipes Adams & White, 1848: 49 View in CoL [ type locality Philippines].
Gelasimus gaimardi H. Milne Edwards, 1852: 150 View in CoL , pl. 4(17) [ type locality Tonga]; Shen 1940: 232 [ Hong Kong].
Gelasimus splendidus Stimpson, 1858: 99 View in CoL ; 1907: 106, pl. 14, fig. 2 [ type locality Hong Kong].
Gelasimus chlorophthalmus View in CoL — Cano 1889: 92, 234 [Xiamen].
Uca splendida View in CoL — Gee 1926: 165 [ Hong Kong].
Uca gaimardi View in CoL — Gordon 1931: 528 [list]; Shen 1936: 77 [Hainan].
Uca ( Amphiuca) chlorophthalmus crassipes View in CoL — Crane 1975: 101, pls. 15A–F, 46B, figs. 13A–I, 14, 26C, 37H, 39A, 56C, 60L, M, 68B, 81G, 82G, 83A [ Hong Kong]; Dai et al. 1986: 428, pl. 59(5), fig. 238(1–2) [Guangdong]; Dai & Yang 1991: 468, pl. 59(5), fig. 238 [Guangdong].
Uca crassipes View in CoL — Jones & Morton 1994: 26, pl. 3C, D, fig. 5 [ Hong Kong]; Kwok & Tang 2006: 4, figs. 8, 9 [ Hong Kong]; Yang et al. 2008: 807 [Guangdong; Hainan].
Uca chlorophthalmus View in CoL — Cai et al. 1998: 117 [ Hong Kong].
Uca ( Paraleptuca) crassipes View in CoL —Ng et al. 2008: 241 [list].
Material examined. Hong Kong: 1 3 ( 14.43 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13368), Tai Tam, coll. Y.-C. Fan, 27 Jul. 2006. Hainan: 3 3 ( 18.57–20.1 mm), 1 Ƥ ( 16.56 mm) (MBMCAS 166245), Beigang, Meilan, Haikou, 6 Jun. 1958; 1 3 ( 19.05 mm), 1 Ƥ ( 12.56 mm) (MBMCAS 166247), Qinglan Harbor, Wenchang, coll. Wang, 27 Apr. 1980; 1 3 ( 19.97 mm) (MBMCAS 166269), Qinglan Harbor, Wenchang, 5 Nov. 1990; 6 3 ( 12.45– 17.66 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13369), Wenchang, coll. K. Wong & S.-L. Yang, 3 Dec. 2008; 12 3 ( 9.38–22.88 mm), 5 ƤƤ ( 12.38–17.71 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13370), Sanya, coll. H.-T. Shih & R.-H. Lee, 28 Jun. 2004.
Distribution. West Pacific ( Japan, Taiwan, China, Philippines, New Guinea, Australia), Central and South Pacific, and eastern Indian Ocean ( Thailand).
Remarks. Cano (1889) recorded Gelasimus chlorophthalmus from Xiamen, Fujian, but Crane (1975: 103) questioned the identification without any comment. However, its distribution in Fujian is not impossible because it has been recorded in adjacent areas, e.g., continental China ( Hong Kong) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ), Penghu Island in the central Taiwan Strait ( Shih et al. 2008), and on the western coast of Taiwan ( Shih 1994).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
InfraOrder |
Brachyura |
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Uca crassipes ( Adams & White, 1848 )
| Shih, Hsi-Te, Ng, Peter K. L., Fang, Shou-Hua, Chan, Benny K. K. & Wong, Kingsley J. H. 2010 |
Uca chlorophthalmus
| Cai 1998: 117 |
Uca crassipes
| Yang 2008: 807 |
| Kwok 2006: 4 |
| Jones 1994: 26 |
Uca ( Amphiuca ) chlorophthalmus crassipes
| Dai 1991: 468 |
| Dai 1986: 428 |
| Crane 1975: 101 |
Uca gaimardi
| Shen 1936: 77 |
| Gordon 1931: 528 |
Uca splendida
| Gee 1926: 165 |
Gelasimus chlorophthalmus
| Cano 1889: 92 |
Gelasimus splendidus
| Stimpson 1858: 99 |
Gelasimus gaimardi H. Milne Edwards, 1852 : 150
| Shen 1940: 232 |
| Milne 1852: 150 |
Gelasimus crassipes
| Adams 1848: 49 |
