Coptobrycon Géry, 1966
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252010000400004 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493718 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B6EF01C-FFDF-7557-FE9F-FB50FA906C88 |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966 |
| status |
|
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966 View in CoL View at ENA
Figs. 1-7 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226 View in CoL (type-species: Hasemania bilineata Ellis, 1911 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy).
Diagnosis. Coptobrycon is easily distinguished from all other Characidae due to: a very peculiar dentary dentition, with only three, large, anterior, multicuspid and pedunculated, principal teeth in each half of the dentary ( Fig. 5 View Fig ; vs. four or more conical or cuspidate and not pedunculated teeth, except in the Cheirodontinae and Iguanodectinae , which have more than four pedunculated teeth); the absence of the nasal bone ( vs. present); the presence of a straight, dark brown stripe slightly above the base of the anal fin ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), from vertical through its origin or slightly behind, continuing through the ventral portion of the caudal peduncle up to the base of the caudal fin ( vs. absent). Furthermore, it can also be separated from all other Characidae , except Grundulus , by having the nasal pores separated by a non confluent space ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; vs. nasal pores very close and confluent); infraorbitals 4 and 6 (5, sometimes) absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); infraorbital laterosensory canal greatly reduced, with pores inconspicuous or absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); supraorbital laterosensory canal absent in posterior portion of the frontal ( vs. present). Other useful diagnostic characters include: up to six olfactory rosette lamellae, turned to the posterior portion of the nasal canal ( Fig. 3 View Fig ; vs. more than ten lamellae, generally more than fifteen, concentrically arranged; except in Grundulus and Xenurobrycon ); adipose fin absent ( Fig. 1 View Fig ; vs. present; except in Grundulus , Gymnocharacinus bergi , Hasemania , some Hyphessobrycon species , and Spintherobolus ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966
| Langeani, Francisco & Serra, Jane Piton 2010 |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226
| Gery, J 1966: 226 |
