Coptobrycon Géry, 1966

Langeani, Francisco & Serra, Jane Piton, 2010, Coptobrycon bilineatus (Ellis, 1911) (Characiformes: Characidae): redescription and comments on its phylogenetic relationships, Neotropical Ichthyology 8 (4), pp. 727-736 : 728

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252010000400004

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493718

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B6EF01C-FFDF-7557-FE9F-FB50FA906C88

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Coptobrycon Géry, 1966
status

 

Coptobrycon Géry, 1966 View in CoL View at ENA

Figs. 1-7 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig

Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226 View in CoL (type-species: Hasemania bilineata Ellis, 1911 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy).

Diagnosis. Coptobrycon is easily distinguished from all other Characidae due to: a very peculiar dentary dentition, with only three, large, anterior, multicuspid and pedunculated, principal teeth in each half of the dentary ( Fig. 5 View Fig ; vs. four or more conical or cuspidate and not pedunculated teeth, except in the Cheirodontinae and Iguanodectinae , which have more than four pedunculated teeth); the absence of the nasal bone ( vs. present); the presence of a straight, dark brown stripe slightly above the base of the anal fin ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), from vertical through its origin or slightly behind, continuing through the ventral portion of the caudal peduncle up to the base of the caudal fin ( vs. absent). Furthermore, it can also be separated from all other Characidae , except Grundulus , by having the nasal pores separated by a non confluent space ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; vs. nasal pores very close and confluent); infraorbitals 4 and 6 (5, sometimes) absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); infraorbital laterosensory canal greatly reduced, with pores inconspicuous or absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); supraorbital laterosensory canal absent in posterior portion of the frontal ( vs. present). Other useful diagnostic characters include: up to six olfactory rosette lamellae, turned to the posterior portion of the nasal canal ( Fig. 3 View Fig ; vs. more than ten lamellae, generally more than fifteen, concentrically arranged; except in Grundulus and Xenurobrycon ); adipose fin absent ( Fig. 1 View Fig ; vs. present; except in Grundulus , Gymnocharacinus bergi , Hasemania , some Hyphessobrycon species , and Spintherobolus ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Actinopterygii

Order

Characiformes

Family

Characidae

Loc

Coptobrycon Géry, 1966

Langeani, Francisco & Serra, Jane Piton 2010
2010
Loc

Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226

Gery, J 1966: 226
1966
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF