Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10134379 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6D1CE86-8AC8-4934-9D1B-7EE385D25309 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/266087B2-920D-A868-B895-FA1CA705FA50 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844 |
| status |
|
3. Tricondyla pulchripes White, 1844 View in CoL
( Fig. 9 – 12 View Figures 9–12 , 27, 28 View Figures 23–34 )
长胸缺翅虎甲 chǎng xiōng quē chì hǔ jiǎ
Listings. Wiesner 1992: 19, Naviaux 2002: 36, Putchkov and Matalin 2003: 119, Sawada and Wiesner 2004: 272, 2006: 455, Shook and Wiesner 2006: 21, Shook and Wu 2007: 93, Wu and Shook 2007: 39, 2010: 89, Wu 2011: 32, Aston 2016: 213, Wiesner and Geiser 2016: 62, Putchkov and Matalin 2017: 249, Wiesner et al. 2017: 5, Wiesner 2020: 37.
Diagnosis. Habitus medium in size, very elongated; black with shiny appearance; head rather small, short, temples oblique; interocular cavity not deep, the two longitudinal grooves clearly impressed; pronotum very long, subparallel-sided, distinctly striated, barely convex in lateral view; elytra regularly but feebly widened, poorly gibbose; sculpture formed by large pits arranged in transversal rows; aedeagus thick at base, gradually thinner towards apex.
Distribution. China ( Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hong Kong, Yunnan), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
