Triplaris prognostica Rottb. (1776: 285)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.700.2.1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E4887E6-9855-FFEA-5284-0536FE80FAFE |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Triplaris prognostica Rottb. (1776: 285) |
| status |
|
Triplaris prognostica Rottb. (1776: 285) View in CoL , nom. nud.
Notes:— The citation is not a protologue. It is merely a brief entry indicating that there is such a plant as Triplaris prognostica . The name lacks a validating description or diagnosis.
Triplaris ramiflora Schott ex Meisn. (1856: 54) , nom. nud., pro syn. ≡ Triplaris viridiflora Schott ex Meisn. , nom. nud., pro syn. (1855: 54) = Ruprechtia lundii Meisn. (1855: 54)
Notes:— In Flora Brasiliensis (1855) , Meisner mentions two names ( T. ramiflora and T. viridiflora ) as synonyms of Ruprechtia lundii . According to the Art. 36.1b of ICBN, both these names are not validly published. Note that Meisner (1856) then indicates where specimens identified using these names can be found, i.e. “ Triplaris ramiflora et viridiflora Schott. n. 4562. ♂ in Herb. Mus. Vindobon.”. We could not find any Schott collection of Triplaris at W. Nor could we find this particular Schott collection elsewhere. Pendry (2004) does not mention a T. ramiflora or T. viridiflora in connection with R. lundii but he did designate a type specimen for R. lundii from among the other specimens cited by Meisner (1856).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.