Macrorhizodus cf. praecursor (Leriche, 1905)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5646.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:816A3D35-45D9-417F-8E0B-065EED0831AC |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/177D87CE-FF92-FFE9-3883-FB7EFD1DFE03 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macrorhizodus cf. praecursor (Leriche, 1905) |
status |
|
† Macrorhizodus cf. praecursor (Leriche, 1905)
Material: Thirty-one poorly preserved teeth in the Malik Sayar Collection. 10 anterior teeth, 3 intermediate teeth, 9 lateral teeth, and 9 symphysial teeth were bulk-stored with their original labels and re-QR coded under the number MS10-001.00 ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ).
Locality: On the eastern shore of the Küçükçekmece Lagoon ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; 5 View FIGURE 5 ) in the Lutetian-aged level, Soğucak Formation ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
Description and remarks: The fossilised set of 30 teeth is attributed to Macrorhizodus spp. based on distinct morphological characteristics. Each tooth displays a slender, elongated crown with a smooth, non-serrated cutting edge, typical of this genus. The crowns are labio-lingually compressed, narrow, and triangular, with a hook-like, dagger-shaped form terminating in a sharp apex. The distal edge is slightly convex, while the mesial edge is straight or subtly concave. The crown is symmetrical and angled, with a convex labial face and a slightly concave lingual face, and an apron is present on the labial surface. The basal portions of the root are missing, hindering assessment of lateral cusplets. These features, including the smooth edges, symmetrical triangular shape, and lack of serrations or basal cusps, align with diagnostic characteristics of genus Macrorhizodus .
While poor preservation and absence of roots are observed, possibly due to fossilisation conditions or handling, the morphology of these specimens is consistent with Macrorhizodus cf. praecursor , a species noted for its broad distribution in the Tethys Ocean during the Middle Eocene to Early Oligocene ( Popov et al. 2024). Some studies restrict M. praecursor to the Lutetian stage (e.g., Trif et al. 2019; Asan et al. 2022), while others extend its range from the Eocene into the Oligocene (e.g., Cappetta, 1987; Otero et al. 2015). This species has been reported in various regions, including the lowermost Bartonian of Transylvanian Basin, Romania ( Trif, 2019), the Middle Eocene of Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine ( Kovalchuk et al. 2023), and the Eocene Lutetian deposits of Virginia's Piney Point Formation ( Ward and Wiest, 1990).
These morphological traits and the characteristic shape, size, and stratigraphic positioning of the specimens support classification within genus Macrorhizodus , consistent with cf. praecursor (Leriche, 1905) as referenced by Ebersole et al. (2019) and Cappetta (2012). This represents the first documented occurrence of genus Macrorhizodus within the Middle Eocene (Lutetian) Soğucak Formation in Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey.
Autecology: During the Lutetian age, a presumed extinct ancestral taxon of I. oxyrinchus , Macrorhizodus praecursor , likely inhabited ancient oceans as a pelagic predator. This genus is known for its highly migratory behaviour, and its fossil form during the Lutetian age would likely have had a similar ecological niche as its extant counterparts. Based on findings from fossil specimens, it is suggested that the Macrorhizodus praecursor during the Lutetian age would have played a role in the marine ecosystem as an efficient and powerful apex predator, preying on a various smaller marine animals ( Uhen, 2007).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.