Physocephala caenoneura, Krober, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2019.68.2.209 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70A02482-0040-4136-ABB0-9C840A4D771A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/173187E9-DD08-FFD4-25D8-4DBAFB1867F3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Physocephala caenoneura |
status |
|
Physocephala caenoneura View in CoL species-group
Species belonging to this group were previously included together with other species in the Pseudophysocephala nigritarsis species-group of Camras (2001). This caused some confusion because these species may have both a distinct vena spuria which is well separated from radius R 4+5, and short apical abdominal segments, thus poten- tially appearing to fall within his Pseudophysocephala vitripennis and Pseudophysocephala platycephala species-groups respectively.
Females of the caenoneura species-group are easily recognised by the normally developed, usually ad- pressed theca and short tergites 5 and 6. From outside the caenoneura group, only P. microvena and P. pseudomicrovena share this combination of characters but are easily recognised as belonging to the Physocephala microvena species-group by the lack of a vena spuria in cell r 4+5, and typically also by the reduced or absent radi- al-medial crossvein. Males of caenoneura group can be more difficult to assign, however, the elongated basal ari- stomere and less modified wing venation being the only characters which reliably distinguish them from males of the microvena species-group. All members of this group are restricted to the Afrotropical Region.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |