Lestes patricia, Fraser, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2023.1917217 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/112E87DF-FF8C-FFD4-FF95-FABCFB571CE3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lestes patricia |
status |
|
Recent records of L. patricia Fraser, 1924 View in CoL , and the taxonomic status of L. p. taamrpatti Bhakare, Bhoite & Pawar, 2020
Lestes patricia View in CoL was described based on a single male collected at Kodagu (= Coorg), Karnataka, India ( Fraser, 1924) ( Fig. 7). This species was recently reported from Urmodi Dam, Maharashtra, India, by Bhakare et al. (2020), which represents the first confirmed record afer the original species description. These specimens were described as a new subspecies, Lestes patricia taamrpatti Bhakare, Bhoite & Pawar, 2020 , based on mi- nor differences. They mention that in this subspecies “Frons [are] black (azure blue vide Fraser [1924])”, but Figure 5 ( Bhakare et al., 2020: 89) shows that the ante- frons in their specimens are indeed blue. In the original description, Fraser (1924: 486) stated that “A middorsal stripe of matt black with straight borders, extending on each side to about half way to the humeral stripe”. However, a close examination of the holotype shows a middorsal coppery red area that is enclosed by narrow dark olivaceous stripes ( Figs 7a–c), exactly as described by Bhakare et al. (2020).
With regards to the caudal appendages, Bhakare et al. (2020) state “Paraprocts very short, not extending to the end of expanded part of cerci (extending nearly to the end of expanded part vide Fraser [1924] [ Fig. 7e]).”
The use of long paraprocts and number of crossveins as diagnostic characters in L. patricia were most likely based on the key to the species of Lestes provided by Kosterin (2019). However, a year later the same author ( Kosterin, 2020) published an errata to the keys that re- moved the relevance of both characters (with respect to L. patricia , see the same photos of its holotype that are provided here in Fig. 7), rendering the characters used by Bhakare et al. (2020) to substantiate their subspecies based on literature irrelevant. The males illustrated in Bhakare et al. (2020) indeed agree very well with the images of the holotype of L. patricia ( Fig. 7).
Since the type locality and the locality surveyed by Bhakare et al. (2020) are part of the Western Ghats mountain region there is no geographical support for recognizing a different subspecies either. Thus there are no conclusive characters to warrant a separate subspecies status for the population reported by Bhakare et al. (2020). We therefore find Lestes patricia taamrpatti to be a junior synonym of Lestes patricia ( Lestes patricia = Lestes patricia taamrpattii syn. nov.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lestes patricia
Joshi, Shantanu, Sawant, Dattaprasad, Dalvi, Akshay, Koli, Yogesh, Haneef, Muhammed, Sanap, Rajesh & Kunte, Krushnamegh 2023 |
Lestes patricia taamrpatti
Bhakare, Bhoite & Pawar 2020 |
Lestes patricia
Fraser 1924 |