Chaerilus pictus ( Pocock, 1890 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16963598 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3BDF2883-679A-4F3B-91E1-C2B896A79B67 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/111A5C1A-E018-FFF5-9ADD-4CF5FA4DA848 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chaerilus pictus ( Pocock, 1890 ) |
status |
|
Chaerilus pictus ( Pocock, 1890) View in CoL
( Tables 1–2) http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B2EE7A0-
5DFB-437A-8C64-ACF469E52E22
Uromachus pictus : Pocock, 1890: 250–252.
Chaerilus pictus View in CoL : Kraepelin, 1894: 142–144; Kraepelin, 1899: 159; Pocock, 1900: 59–62; Kraepelin, 1913: 151–153; Takashima, 1945: 100; Pérez, 1974: 31; Tikader & Bastawade, 1983: 319, 332–339; Kovařík, 1998: 129; Fet, 2000: 327; Kovařík, 2000: 38, 40, 53–54, 57, 59, 70–72; Kovařík, 2001: 84; Zhu et al., 2004: 113–114; Bastawade, 2006: 449–450; Zhu et al., 2008: 37–40 View Cited Treatment , 43–44, 48; Di et al., 2009: 131–133; Di, 2009: 98, 104; Di & Zhu, 2009: 97–98, 101; Sun, 2010: 101, 106, 208; Lourenço & Duhem, 2010: 14, 21, 23; Kovařík, 2012: 3; Kovařík & Ojanguren-Affilastro, 2013: 132–133, 139, 144; Di et al., 2013: 52 View Cited Treatment , 55–56, 88, 95; Di et al., 2014: 4, 9, 14; Yin et al., 2015: 42, 48, 50; Di et al., 2015: 111; Lourenço, 2020: 5; Tang, 2022a: 55; Tang, 2025: 13 View Cited Treatment , 16.
Chaerilus gemmifer : Pocock, 1894b: 81; Kraepelin, 1899: 159–160; Pocock, 1900: 60–61; Kraepelin, 1913: 151– 153; Takashima, 1945: 100; Pérez, 1974: 31; Tikader & Bastawade, 1983: 319, 346–351; Kovařík, 1998: 129; Fet, 2000: 326; Kovařík, 2000: 38, 40, 53–54, 57, 71;
Bastawade, 2006: 449–450; Tang, 2025: 13, 16.
= Chaerilus gemmifer Pocock, 1894b: 81 (syn. Kovařík, 2000: 53). http: //zoobank. org/?lsid=urn: lsid: zoobank. o rg: act: A 4557 E 0 7 - 5 FBA- 48 BF - 8 E 7 1 - B46D9E53B2AF TYPE MATERIAL ( Pocock, 1894b: 81). Bangladesh, Sylhet Division, Sylhet District, Sylhet City, 2♀, NHMUK.
Chaerilus pictus var. gemmifer : Kraepelin, 1913: 153.
Chaerilus pictus : misidentification; see C. conchiformus .
TYPE MATERIAL ( Pocock, 1890: 252). Bangladesh, Sylhet
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chaerilus pictus ( Pocock, 1890 )
Tang, Victoria 2025 |
Chaerilus pictus
TANG 2025: 13 |
TANG 2022: 55 |
YIN 2015: 42 |
DI 2015: 111 |
DI 2014: 4 |
DI 2013: 52 |
SUN 2010: 101 |
ZHU & HAN & LOURENCO 2008: 37 |
BASTAWADE 2006: 449 |
ZHU & QI J. - X. 2004: 113 |
KOVARIK 2001: 84 |
FET 2000: 327 |
KOVARIK 2000: 38 |
KOVARIK 1998: 129 |
PEREZ 1974: 31 |
TAKASHIMA 1945: 100 |
POCOCK 1900: 59 |
KRAEPELIN 1899: 159 |
KRAEPELIN 1894: 142 |
Chaerilus gemmifer
FET 2000: 326 |
KOVARIK 2000: 38 |
KOVARIK 1998: 129 |
PEREZ 1974: 31 |
TAKASHIMA 1945: 100 |
POCOCK 1900: 60 |
KRAEPELIN 1899: 159 |
POCOCK 1894: 81 |
Chaerilus gemmifer
KOVARIK 2000: 53 |
POCOCK 1894: 81 |
POCOCK 1894: 81 |
Uromachus pictus
POCOCK 1890: 250 |