Nungara, Pinto & Rheims, 2016

Pinto, Elaine Cristina & Rheims, Cristina Anne, 2016, A new genus of Neotropical spiders of the family Sparassidae (Arachnida: Araneae), Zoologia (e 20160160) 33 (6), pp. 1-15 : 2-6

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689zool-20160160

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15677984

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0F46878F-FFDA-6A4F-26DF-FD79FC49F97C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Nungara
status

gen. nov.

Nungara View in CoL gen. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C48AFC66-7C23-4D7D-B3FC-9E25FC9AF322

Type species. Olios niveomaculatus Mello-Leitão, 1941 .

Diagnosis. Species of the genus Nungara gen. nov. resemble those of the Neotropical genera Anaptomecus Simon, 1903 , Sparianthina Banks, 1929 , Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Caayguara Rheims, 2010 in having three promarginal teeth and intermarginal denticles on the chelicerae ( Fig. 7 View Figures 7-12 ; JäGER et al. 2009: figs. 10, 89, 109; RHEIMS 2010a: fig. 7; 2010b: fig. 2; GUALA et al. 2012: fig. 22). They are distinguished from Anaptomecus , Sparianthina and Guadana in having a short-toothed female pedipalp claw ( Fig. 16 View Figures 13-16 ) (long-toothed in the latter genera, see JäGER et al. 2009: figs.13, 64; RHEIMS 2010a: fig. 9) and from all four genera in having three pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I-II (four in Anaptomecus , Sparianthina and Guadana and two in Caayguara ) and 4-6 strong setae at the base of fang ( Fig. 7 View Figures 7-12 ) (only one in the latter genera, see RHEIMS 2010a: fig. 7; 2010b: fig. 2; GUALA et al. 2012: figs.19-20). Additionally, species of Nungara gen. nov. can be distinguished from those of all known Neotropical genera by the presence of a deep tegular groove on the male palp ( Figs. 28 View Figures 27-32 , 39 View Figures 38-43 , 50 View Figures 49-54 ) and a hood-like projection on the median septum of the female epigyne ( Figs. 30 View Figures 27-32 , 41 View Figures 38-43 , 52 View Figures 49-54 ).

Description. Total length: males 6.0-15.4, females 6.1-14.0. Prosoma slightly longer than wide; cephalic region slightly higher than thoracic region, sloping posteriorly; fovea conspicuous on posterior third of prosoma; eyes arranged in two rows, both straight or very slightly procurved; AME larger than or as large as ALE and more distant from each other than from ALE; PME smaller than PLE and more distant or closer to each other than to PLE ( Figs.1-6 View Figures 1-4 View Figures 5-6 ); clypeus low, less than AME diameter. Chelicerae longer than wide with three promarginal teeth, the median one largest, and four retromarginal teeth, the basal one smallest; intermarginal denticles present at base of furrow; six strong setae at base of fang ( Fig. 7 View Figures 7-12 ). Labium slightly longer than wide. Endites parallel, longer than wide, with dense scopulae on internal margin; serrula with a single row of denticles ( Fig. 8 View Figures 7-12 ). Sternum slightly longer than wide, very slightly projected between coxae IV. Legs laterigrade (2143); trochanter I-IV strongly notched ( Fig. 9 View Figures 7-12 ); metatarsi I-IV with distal dorsal trilobate membrane with median lobe as large or slightly larger than lateral projections ( Fig. 10 View Figures 7-12 ); trichobothria present on dorsum of tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi, arranged in several rows on tarsi and converging to a single row on metatarsi; bothrium with elliptical dorsal plate, with one or two distal grooves, projecting over smooth basal plate ( Fig. 11 View Figures 7-12 ); tarsal organ capsulate with keyhole-shaped opening, located dorsally at the distal end of tarsi ( Fig. 12 View Figures 7-12 ); tarsi with pair of pectinate claws with one strongly curved main tooth followed by 12-18 secondary, slightly curved, smaller teeth ( Figs. 13-14 View Figures 13-16 ); claw tufts with distally bifid hairs (Fig. 15); spination in males: femur I-IV:p1-1-1; d0-1-1; r1-1-1; patellae: I-IV p1; r1; tibiae: I−II: p1-0-1; d1-1-1; r1-0-1; v2-2-2; tibiae III−IV: p1-0-1; d0-0-0(1); r1-0-1; v2-2-2; metatarsi I−III: p1-1-0; r1-1-0; v2-2-0; metatarsus IV: p1-1-2; r1-1-2; v2-2-0; palp: femur: p0-0-1; d0-1-2; r0-0-1; patella: p1; r1; tibia:p2-1-0; d1-0-0; r1-1-0; spination in females: as in males except tibia I-IV: d0 and palp tarsus: p2-1-0; r2-1-0. Female palps with a single pectinate claw, with one strong distal tooth followed by 6-10 shorter and slightly curved secondary teeth ( Fig. 16 View Figures 13-16 ); sensory setae long, distally curved, with barbules along the entire setae and with distal region bearing a large pore and a single filiform extension ( Fig. 20 View Figures 17-20 ), distributed sparsely along dorsal surface of tarsus ( Fig. 19 View Figures 17-20 ). Opisthosoma oval, longer than wide; male epiandrous region with scattered epiandrous spigots; tracheal spiracle single, contiguous to spinnerets; anal tubercle small, triangular with few terminal hairs. Six spinnerets: ALS contiguous, conical, bisegmented, distal segment bearing 20-25 piriform gland spigots in males and females, one major ampullate gland spigot and one nubbin in males ( Fig. 21 View Figures 21-26 ) and two major ampullate gland spigots in females ( Fig. 24 View Figures 21-26 ); PMS short and truncate with 3-5 cylindrical gland spigots and 10-15 aciniform gland spigots in males and females, one minor ampullate gland spigot and one tartipore in males ( Fig. 22 View Figures 21-26 ) and two minor ampullate gland spigots in females ( Fig. 25 View Figures 21-26 ); PLS conical, bisegmented, distal segment bearing 20-25 aciniform gland spigots ( Figs. 23, 26 View Figures 21-26 ). Male palp: tibia as long as cymbium with three prolateral, one dorsal and two retrolateral spines ( Figs. 27-29 View Figures 27-32 ); RTA simple, arising distally from retrolateral tibia ( Figs. 28 View Figures 27-32 , 39 View Figures 38-43 , 50 View Figures 49-54 ); cymbium slightly elongate with oval, ventral alveolus and dorsal scopulae of long, distally curved sensory setae, with barbules along the entire setae and with distal region bearing a large pore and an single filiform extension ( Figs. 17-18 View Figures 17-20 ); tegulum rounded with strong tegular groove, longitudinal ( Fig. 39 View Figures 38-43 ) or C-shaped ( Figs. 28 View Figures 27-32 , 50 View Figures 49-54 ); embolus filiform, with no projections, arising from tegulum between 2-6 o’clock positions; conductor membranous, gutter-shaped ( Figs. 28 View Figures 27-32 , 39, 50). Female epigyne: epigynal plate of variable shape, usually as wide as long; lateral lobes simple, without projections, partially covering the median septum; median septum of variable shapes bearing a pair of anterior copulatory openings and a median hoodlike projection ( Figs.30 View Figures 27-32 , 41 View Figures 38-43 , 52 View Figures 49-54 ). Female vulva: internal duct system with copulatory ducts short; glandular projection large, slightly cylindrical, arising close to the copulatory openings; spermathecae long, convoluted; fertilization ducts short, hook-shaped and anterio-laterad ( Figs. 31-32 View Figures 27-32 , 42-43 View Figures 38-43 , 53-54 View Figures 49-54 ).

Distribution. Known from western Ecuador (state of Esmeraldas) and northern to southern Brazil, (states of Pará, Maranhão, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, Mato Grosso, Bahia, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul) ( Fig. 60 View Figure 60 ).

Composition. Three species: Nungara niveomaculata (Mello-Leitão, 1941) comb. nov.; Nungara gaturama sp. nov.; Nungara anama sp. nov.

Etymology. The specific name is a noun from the Tupi Indian Language meaning “equal, similar” and refers to the strong similarity between the species genitalia. Gender is feminine.

Remarks. Based on previous subfamilial classifications ( SIMON 1897, 1903, HOGG 1903, JäRVI 1912, 1914, PETRUNKEVITCH 1928, ROEWER 1954, JäGER 1998) and unpublished morphological evidences, MORADMAND et al. (2014: fig. 1) reported the current classification concept for all known genera of Sparassidae . Heteropodinae appears divided into two groups. The core group, Heteropodinae sensu stricto, includes the Australasian and African genera while the Neotropical genera, Anaptomecus , Sparianthina, Guadana and Caayguara group under Heteropodinae sensu latu. In this paper, the authors investigated the phylogeny of Sparassidae using four molecular markers. However, the sampling included only two Neotropical representatives, Polybetes pythagoricus (Holmberg, 1875) and Olios cf. sanctivicenti ( Simon, 1897). The latter species belongs to an unknown genus, currently misplaced in Olios , and shares with Nungara gen. nov. the presence of three promarginal teeth and intermarginal denticles on the chelicerae, a short-toothed female pedipalp claw and three pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I-II. Their results show O. cf. santivicenti sister to P. pythagoricus , at the base of a large clade, sister to Heteropodinae sensu strictu (see MORADMAND et al. 2014: fig. 3). Based on these evidences the authors classify O. cf. sanctivicenti as Heteropodinae sensu latu. However, no representatives of Anaptomecus , Sparianthina , Guadana or Caayguara were included in this analysis and the relationship between these genera, Nungara gen. nov. and O. cf. sanctivicenti remains unresolved. Thus, taking into account the morphological aspects of these genera and species, Heteropodinae sensu latu should include only Anaptomecus , Sparianthina and Guadana . These genera share with Heteropodinae sensu strictu the long-toothed female pedipalp claw, the presence of four pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I-II and a single strong setae at the base of fang (see JäGER et al. 2009: figs. 10, 89, 109; RHEIMS 2010a: fig. 7; GUALA et al. 2012: fig. 22). Nungara gen. nov., Caayguara and O. cf. sanctivicenti , all with a short-toothed female pedipalp claw, two or three pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I-II and more than five strong setae at the base of fang (see Figs. 7 View Figures 7-12 , 16 View Figures 13-16 ; RHEIMS 2010b: figs. 2, 7), should be excluded from Heteropodinae sensu latu. Nevertheless, their relationship to one another as well as their placement within Sparassidae remains unresolved until a more comprehensive analysis, including more Neotropical representatives, is conducted.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Sparassidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF