Cytospora piceicola Ilyukhin & Markovsk., 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.145445 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15342287 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0E5E70CD-2F46-56B6-8837-A111A55E8EFB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cytospora piceicola Ilyukhin & Markovsk. |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cytospora piceicola Ilyukhin & Markovsk. sp. nov.
Fig. 4 View Figure 4
Etymology.
The name refers to the host genus, Picea , from which the fungus was first isolated.
Holotype.
Canada • Ontario, Lincoln , 43°06'39.0"N, 79°19'15.4"W, isolated from cankered wood (branches) of Picea glauca , April 2020, E. Ilyukhin (holotype BILAS 51884 About BILAS , ex-holotype living culture BILAS 51886 About BILAS = EI-20, isotype DAOM 985024 View Materials , DAOMC 256985 ). GoogleMaps
Description.
Sexual morph: not observed in culture. Asexual morph: Conidiomata appearing after 25 days of incubation on MEA, rare, pycnidial, solitary, globose to subglobose, dark grey to black when dry, with few ovoid locules, (610 –) 824–1071 (– 1380) μm diam. Conidiophores micronematous, hyaline, smooth-walled, reduced to unbranched conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, phialidic, lageniform, or ampulliform (7.5 –) 8.8–10.6 (– 13.0) × (1.0 –) 1.3–1.7 (– 2.0) μm. Conidia abundant, relatively small, single, hyaline, aseptate, slightly curved, allantoid, thin-walled (3.5 –) 3.8–4.9 (– 5.5) × (1.0 –) 0.8–1.3 (– 1.5) μm.
Culture characteristics.
Colonies on MEA white to light brown with short aerial mycelium tufts in the center, becoming darker with age, relatively slow-growing (28 mm in diameter) after 7 days of incubation. Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, and septate.
Notes.
Based on ITS sequence data, C. piceicola is 99 % similar to C. globosa MFLU : 16-2054 (554 / 559, 3 gaps) and C. pinastri CBS 113.81 (540 / 545, 0 gaps). But combined multi-gene phylogenetic analysis clearly distinguished C. piceicola from these two species (ML / BI = 95 / -). The new species, C. piceicola , differs from C. globosa (4–6.5 × 1–2 µm) and C. pinastri (4–7 × 1–1.3 μm) by having shorter conidia and clearly lageniform or ampulliform conidiogenous cells ( Hayova and Minter 2013; Li et al. 2020). The culture characteristics cannot be used for species discrimination as they are either unavailable ( C. pinastri ) or different media has been used ( C. globosa ). Thus, C. piceicola is considered a novel species based on both molecular data and morphological characteristics.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |