Pintalia dorensis Santos, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5678.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A9F16C3C-8B88-4713-A3A3-EEBC37EBC72A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B2E630B-8816-C03B-8AE0-05B5FB95FC04 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pintalia dorensis Santos |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pintalia dorensis Santos sp. nov.
https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1D6520B0-487F-47BA-9EA4-E38F6B211C01
( Figs. 58 A–F View FIGURE 58 ; 59 A–G View FIGURE 59 ; 60 A–I View FIGURE 60 ; 61A–D View FIGURE 61 ; 62 View FIGURE 62 )
Type material. Holotype: Male Brazil, MG: Dores de Guanhães, DGN_02 Cave, ( UTM 721790 W 780121S, 23K), 31. viii. 2018, (Rabelo et al.) ( ISLA 66226 ) . Holotype condition: not dissected, stored preserved in a vial with 70% ethanol. Paratypes: Same data of the male holotype, except for 1♂ ( ISLA 75690 ) .
Additional material examined. Brazil, MG: Rio Piracicaba , 1♂ MONL _0006 Cave , ( UTM 685543 E 7791350N, 23K) , 28. Ii. 2023, ( Ativo Ambiental et al.) ( ISLA 114425) ;
Rio Piracicaba , 2♂ and 1 ♀ AGL_0011 Cave, ( UTM 687972 E 7794674N, 23K), 03-04. iii. 2021, (Ativo Ambiental et al.) ( ISLA 102668); Santa Barbara, 1♂ and 1♀ CAP1_0009 Cave, ( UTM 646028 E 7773028N, 23K), 09. iii. 2022, (Ativo Ambiental et al.) ( ISLA 106997); Santa Barbara, 1♂ CAP1_0010 Cave, ( UTM 646048 E 7772983N, 23K), 16. iii. 2022, (Ativo Ambiental et al.) ( ISLA 106992); Mariana, 1♂ and 1 nymph FN_0001 Cave, ( UTM 663923 E 7752548N, 23K), 04. xii. 2020, (Spelayon et al.) ( ISLA 83502); João Monlevade, 1♂ ARC-006 Cave, ( UTM 692486 E 7810300N, 23K), 28. viii-03. ix. 2022, (Spelayon et al.) ( ISLA 112841) .
Description. Coloration (preserved specimen): Body generally strong orange yellow (68), contrasting with some regions in deep orange yellow (69) and deep orange yellow (56) of the carinae, brilliant orange yellow (67) between lateral carinae of the mesonotum and some points of the vertex and frons medially. Tegmina hyaline with diffuse spots of moderate yellow (87) to dark yellow (88), pterostigma region is clearer in pale orange yellow (73).
Body length. Male. 4.1–5.3 mm (n=2).
Head. Vertex ( Fig. 58A, C View FIGURE 58 ): approximately 2.5 times wider (0.5) than long (0.2); apical compartment moderately large, approx. 4.0 times wider (0.4) than medially long (0.1); apical transverse carina (0.358) smaller than the subapical carina (0.408); angled formed by caudal margin, moderately triangular and slightly concave laterally. Frons ( Fig. 58B View FIGURE 58 ): 1.5 times longer (1.1) than wide (0.7), and approx. 2.3 times wider medially than apically (0.3). Frontoclypeal suture, well bent upwards medially, straight laterally. Postclypeus ( Fig. 58B View FIGURE 58 ): median carina developed or moderately developed. Anteclypeus ( Fig. 58B View FIGURE 58 ): median carina moderately developed. Rostrum in ventral view surpassing slightly the base of the abdomen.
Thorax. Pronotum ( Figs. 58A, C View FIGURE 58 ): submedian carinae weakly developed slightly irregular and evanescent behind the eyes; hind margin obtuse or obtusely angled. Mesonotum ( Fig. 58A View FIGURE 58 ): median carina well developed but evanescent or absent distally; lateral carinae strongly developed. Tegmina (Forewings) ( Fig. 58D View FIGURE 58 ): length 6.5 mm; hyaline with brown spots, two curved spots in pcc, two also curved spots of increasing size between fork A1/A2 and SCP+R, one large round spots in the post nodal region between RP1 and MP4, transversal sloping spot developed in the center of the tegmina connecting the SCP+RA fork and the posterior cubital area; rm-1 occurring near the first fork MP fork; mcu-1 occurring distally of the first fork MP fork; simple tubercles in all veins more visible on the A1/A2 fork; petiole in RP2.2+RP2.3 moderately developed; 12 apical cells; 7 subapical cells.
Posterior legs. Hind tibia ( Fig. 58E View FIGURE 58 ): approximately 2.2 mm; with 3 spines laterally, two in the middle of the hind tibia usually smaller. 1 st tarsomere ( Fig. 58F View FIGURE 58 ): 7 apical teeth, two external lateral larger, and two in the middle slightly smaller. 2 nd tarsomere ( Fig. 58F View FIGURE 58 ): 8 apical teeth, the two external ones large (one larger) and the middle ones gradually smaller; 3 large platellae, one separated by apical teeth without platellae.
Male terminalia. Pygofer ( Figs. 59A–C, G View FIGURE 59 ): bilaterally symmetric, in lateral view, dorsocaudal margin with moderately large and rounded process medially bent inward to genital capsule; caudal margin slightly convex basally; in ventral view, ventromedian process triangular almost wider than tall. Anal tube ( Figs. 59A–C, G View FIGURE 59 ; 60A– C View FIGURE 60 ): tubular and distally developed, bent in 90°approx; in dorsal view, well narrow and asymmetrical near to the base and broad distally; in lateral view, wider near the base; distal region moderately large and slightly asymmetric; in ventral view, distal margin large on left lateral, and slightly narrow medially; epiproct and paraproct, short. Genital styles ( Figs. 59A–B, G View FIGURE 59 ; 60D–F View FIGURE 60 ): in lateral view, moderately wider apically and narrow near the base; ventral margin straight; dorsocaudal margin convex apically; dorsal margin with a very small triangular region occurring above the bent medially. Aedeagus ( Figs. 59D–F View FIGURE 59 ; 60G–I View FIGURE 60 ): asymmetric tubular, with seven spines, three of which are movables (a,c,d). Shaft of the aedeagus with four spines; in right lateral view, 1 st spine longer and curved (a), occurs apically on the shaft; 2 nd spine small (b), near the center of the shaft towards the base; in left lateral view, 3 rd spine slightly larger (c), occurs apically on the shaft, towards the ventral region; 4 th spine slightly larger (d), approx. the same size as the third spine, towards the flagellum. Flagellum with three spines, all on the right margin and distally the middle of the flagellum; 5 th spine short and curved (e), occurring at the middle of the flagellum; 6 th spine short and straight (f), occurs slightly dorsally; 7 th spine slightly longer and curved (g), occurs apically on the flagellum.
Etymology. The specific epithet dorensis refers to the type locality, municipality of Dores de Guanhães (MG).
Diagnosis. Pintalia dorensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from other Pintalia species by exhibiting three spines in the medial/apical region of the aedeagal flagellum in addition to four other spines and by the pygofer which displays rounded and curved process laterally.
Distribution. BRA, MG; Dores de Guanhães, DGN 02 cave (Type locality), Rio Piracicaba municipality, Santa Barbara municipallty, Mariana municipality, João Monlevade municipallty.
MG |
Museum of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.