Podocarpus neolinearis M.Idrees & Z.Y.Zhang, 2022
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.11 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17611171 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF4B4F-FFFB-B94E-11EA-74E7FB30EADE |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Podocarpus neolinearis M.Idrees & Z.Y.Zhang |
| status |
nom. nov. |
Podocarpus neolinearis M.Idrees & Z.Y.Zhang , nom. nov.
Replaced name:— Podocarpus linearis de Laub. (2015: 138) , nom. illeg., non P. linearis Sap. (1861: 143) .
Type:— PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Central Papua : Maipa Airstrip, 1962, P.J. Darbyshire 977 ( holotype K; isotypes A, BO, BRI, L) .
Etymology: —The specific epithet derives from the prefix neo -, meaning new, and linearis , the epithet used originally by de Laubenfels (2015).
Distribution:— Endemic to New Guinea, where it grows along the coasts at elevations up to 180 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Podocarpus neolinearis M.Idrees & Z.Y.Zhang
| Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong 2022 |
Podocarpus linearis de Laub. (2015: 138)
| de Laubenfels 2015: 138 |
P. linearis Sap. (1861: 143)
| Sap. Therefore 1861: 143 |