Novius canariensis Korschefsky, 1935

Romanowski, Jerzy, Ceryngier, Piotr, Zmuda, Christian, Větrovec, Jaroslav & Szawaryn, Karol, 2020, The Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) from El Hierro, Canary Islands, Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (2), pp. 249-261 : 256-258

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.2.249

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3120B9BF-7510-4874-8C3B-E93425A65544

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE9A6A-D34D-FF92-FF2C-F89EFDE267BA

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Novius canariensis Korschefsky, 1935
status

 

Novius canariensis Korschefsky, 1935

Fig. 5A–F, L View Fig

Material examined. Árbol Garoé (9.IV.2019), 1 ex. from Juniperus sp. ; El Sabinal (7.IV.2019), 1 ex. from Juniperus sp. ; Mirador de Isora (12.IV.2019), 3 exx. from Euphorbia sp. ; Tigaday (7.IV.2019), 1 ex. from Junipe- rus sp. (leg. J. Romanowski and C. Zmuda) .

Distribution. Endemic Canarian species, known from Tenerife and Gran Canaria ( Eizaguirre 2007; Oromí et al. 2010). New to El Hierro.

Remarks. There were some doubts about the validity of this species. Forrester (2008) wrote that she was unable to find and examine the type series of N. canar- iensis collected on Gran Canaria. However, Korschefsky (1935) drew the habitus of that species, which perfectly fits to our specimens collected on El Hierro ( Fig. 5L View Fig ). To check, whether N. canariensis is a distinct species, its male genitalia were compared with the genitalia of mainland N. cruentatus (Mulsant, 1846) collected in Poland ( Fig. 5G–K View Fig ). Our investigation confirms that the Canari- an species is clearly different from N. cruentatus .

Differential diagnosis. Novius canariensis ( Fig. 5L View Fig ) can be separated externally from N. cruentatus ( Fig. 5K View Fig ) by the shape of red maculae on elytra. In N. canariensis the central part of elytra is occupied by a complete transverse band, whereas in N. cruentatus there are two small red, rounded maculae on each elytron, one close to the lateral margin, second close to sutural line. Sometimes these maculae are larger but they never form complete transverse band. Differences in male genitalia: in N. canar- iensis tegminal strut short, penis guide with blunt apex ( Fig. 5E View Fig ), in lateral view regularly curved ( Fig. 5F View Fig ), in N. cruentatus tegminal strut long, penis guide pointed ( Fig. 5I View Fig ), in lateral view sinusoidal ( Fig. 5J View Fig ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Coccinellidae

Genus

Novius

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF