Clistopyga arhuaca Palacio & Bordera, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5662.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F86B3464-CB7B-40E5-92C1-3D2052C54812 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16607065 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE7019-EB0A-C832-C3C8-FF5C19FDA8B3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Clistopyga arhuaca Palacio & Bordera |
status |
sp. nov. |
5. Clistopyga arhuaca Palacio & Bordera , sp. nov.
( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE 9 , 52A View FIGURE 52 , Appendix I)
Diagnosis. Clistopyga arhuaca may be distinguished from other species of the C. calixtoi species group by the following combination of characters: genal orbits widely and entirely white cream ( Figs 8D View FIGURE 8 , 9A View FIGURE 9 ); predominantly black and white mesosoma and first metasomal tergite, with remain tergites mainly orange reddish to brownish ( Figs 8D–G View FIGURE 8 , 9A, 9D, 9F View FIGURE 9 ); lateral lobes of mesoscutum black with a white cream longitudinal lateral stripe ( Fig. 8D–F View FIGURE 8 , 9A, 9F View FIGURE 9 ); metapleuron 2.76–2.86× as long as high ( Figs 8D View FIGURE 8 , 9A View FIGURE 9 ); submetapleural carina absent ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ); propodeum in dorsal view 1.55–1.65× as long as medially wide ( Fig. 8H View FIGURE 8 ). Additionally, the male of C. arhuaca has very slightly impressed concavity posterior to mandibular base, the inner and outer margins of this concavity without long incurved setae ( Figs 9B View FIGURE 9 , arrow, 9C).
Description. Female: Body length 9.4–12.8 mm. Fore wing length 6.9–9.2 mm.
Head ( Figs 8A, 8D, 8F View FIGURE 8 ). In dorsal view, strongly narrowed behind eyes. Gena smooth and shiny with uniformly sparse setiferous punctures, in dorsal view slightly rounded, 0.30–0.32× as long as eye, in frontal view straight to slightly concave and moderately constricted below eyes. Frons and vertex smooth and shiny, with very isolated setiferous punctures. Posterior ocellus separated from eye 0.90–1.00× its maximum diameter. Distance between hind ocelli 0.64–0.71× maximum diameter of posterior ocellus. Hypostomal carina not lamelliform behind mandible. Face with fine and dense setiferous punctures, distance between punctures more than twice the diameter of punctures. Clypeal suture strongly curved. Clypeus 1.64–1.66× as broad as medially long, distinctly convex in dorsal half, flat in ventral half, with apical margin slightly concave. Malar space 0.73–0.75× as long as basal mandibular width, with a smooth narrow subocular sulcus. Antenna with 29–31 flagellomeres, first flagellomere 7.3–7.5× as long as wide.
Mesosoma ( Figs 8B–C, 8D, 8F, 8H View FIGURE 8 ). Pronotum shiny, smooth, with fine and scattered setiferous punctures in dorsal posterior part. Epomia inconspicuous to absent. Mesoscutum entirely smooth and shiny, with fine setiferous punctures, denser on anterior part of median lobe; anterior half of median lobe not conspicuously prominent, confluent with posterior half. Notaulus deep, reaching about 0.5 the length of mesoscutum. Mesopleuron smooth and shiny, with very sparse small setiferous punctures on anterior and ventral part. Epicnemial carina weak, its dorsal end straight, ending at level of centre of pronotum. Metapleuron shiny, glabrous, except for some sparse setiferous punctures at posterior end, 2.76–2.86× as long as high. Submetapleural carina absent. Propodeum smooth and shiny, with evenly sparse fine setiferous punctures on anterior half of dorsal part and laterally, in dorsal view 1.55–1.65× as long as medially wide. Propodeal spiracle about 0.14 the length to anterior end of pleural carina. Hind leg with femur 3.86–4.03× as long as high, 1.09× as long as tibia. Fore wing with vein cu-a opposite to Rs & M; vein 2 rs-m 0.44–0.57× as long as abscissa of M between 2 rs-m and 2 m-cu; abscissa of Cu 1 between 1 m-cu and Cu 1 a 1.39–1.57× as long as Cu 1 b. Hind wing with vein cu-a 0.42–0.50× as long as first abscissa of Cu 1 between M and cu-a, vein cu-a reclivous, first abscissa of Cu 1 vertical and straight; distal abscissa of Cu 1 weakly to well pigmented.
Metasoma ( Figs 8E, 8G, 8I View FIGURE 8 ). Tergite I 1.73–1.79× as long as posteriorly broad, shiny, with sparse setiferous punctures laterally and posteriorly; spiracle near its anterior 0.4; lateromedian longitudinal carinae present at anterior 0.2 of tergite, very weak; lateral longitudinal carinae present at posterior 0.2 of tergite. Sternite I extending posteriorly about 0.5 of length of tergite. Tergite II 1.29–1.37× as long as posteriorly broad, with dense fine and relatively deep setiferous punctures, distance between punctures about its diameter; remaining tergites same microsculpture. Ovipositor relatively stout, strongly up-curved at distal 0.3, 2.1–2.3× as long as hind tibia. Ovipositor sheath 1.6– 1.8× as long as hind tibia, ventral margin basally without denticles, length of setae on average 2.0–2.3× the sheath basal width.
Colouration ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Head mostly white cream with apex of mandibles, frons and vertex medially, posterior part of gena and occipital region black; antenna blackish brown, ventrally pallid proximally, with pedicel and scape ventrally white cream. Mesosoma white cream except the following black areas: pronotum anteriorly and medially on lateral surface, mesoscutum longitudinally on median and lateral lobes, and posteriorly, mark under subalar prominence, area around episternal scrobe, blotch on ventral hind corner of mesopleuron, margin of metapleuron, groove separating propodeum and metapleuron, and a broad stripe mediodorsally along propodeum. Metasoma with tergite I black with lateral and posterior margins marked with white; tergites II to VIII more or less entirely red to orange, tergite II black marked posterolaterally; ovipositor dark brown; ovipositor sheath black. Anterior two pairs of legs predominantly white, trochanters proximally, and femora and tibia dorsally blackish and tarsi infuscate; hind legs white with coxa externally, trochanter proximally, femur proximally and dorsally, and tibia broadly proximally and distally black; hind tarsal segments distally blackish. Wings weakly infumate, pterostigma blackish.
Male: Body length 10.8 mm. Fore wing length 7.0 mm.
Head ( Figs 9A–B, 9C, 9F View FIGURE 9 ). Gena, in dorsal view, somewhat rounded, 0.32× as long as eye, with a very slightly impressed groove above mandibular base. Posterior ocellus separated from eye 0.80× its maximum diameter. Distance between hind ocelli 0.76× the maximum diameter of posterior ocellus. Clypeus 1.69× as broad as medially long. Malar space 0.61× as long as basal mandibular width. Antenna with 28 flagellomeres, first flagellomere 6.0× as long as wide.
Mesosoma ( Figs 9A, 9F View FIGURE 9 ). Metapleuron 2.68× as long as high. Propodeum in dorsal view 1.73× as long as medially wide. Hind leg with femur 4.95× as long as high, 0.83× as long as tibia. Fore wing with vein 2 rs-m 0.59× as long as abscissa of M between 2 rs-m and 2 m-cu; abscissa of Cu 1 between 1 m-cu and Cu 1 a 1.41× as long as Cu 1 b. Hind wing with vein cu-a 0.39× as long as abscissa of Cu 1 between M and cu-a.
Metasoma ( Figs 9A, 9D, 9E View FIGURE 9 ). Setae on tergites longer and denser than in females. Tergite I 1.96× as long as posteriorly broad. Tergite II 1.62× as long as posteriorly broad.
Colouration ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). As in female but with tergites III to V black marked posterolaterally.
Other features as in female.
Etymology. This species is named in honor to the Colombian indigenous tribe of Arhuacos, who live in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta.
Type material (41 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂). Holotype. Colombia: 1 ♀, Magdalena, PNN Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, San Lorenzo , 10 o 48'N, 73 o 39'W, 2200 m, 25-V/ 9-VI-2000, malaise trap, I. Uribe ( IAvH) GoogleMaps . Paratypes. Colombia: 1 ♀, same data as holotype ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type as holotype, 30-VI/ 15-VII-2000 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, same locality, collector and trap type as holotype, 15–30-VII-2000 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality and trap type as holotype, 1–15-IX-2000, J. Cantillo ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality and trap type as holotype, 14–27-II-2001, J. Cantillo ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, Magdalena, PNN Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, El Ramo , 10 o 48'N, 73 o 39'W, 2500 m, 1–22-XI-2000, malaise trap, J. Cantillo ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 29-I/ 15-II-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 4 ♀♀, 1 ♂, Magdalena, PNN Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Bellavista , 10 o 48'N, 73 o 39'W, 1500 m, 7-V/ 1- VI-2001, malaise trap, J. Cantillo ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 6 ♀♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 1-VI/ 15-VI-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 3 ♀♀, 1 ♂, same locality, collector and trap type, 15-VI/ 2-VII-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 4 ♀♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 13–28-VII-2001 GoogleMaps ; 3 ♀♀, same locality and trap, 28-VII/ 15-VIII-2001, J. Sinisterra ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, 1 ♂, same locality, collector and trap type, 15–30-VIII-2001 GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 30-VIII/ 21-IX-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 21-IX/ 8-X-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 6–22-X-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 22-X/ 7-XI-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 24-II/ 14-III-2002 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, Magdalena, PNN Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, El Chuscal , 10 o 48'N, 73 o 39'W, 2300 m, 16-VI/ 1-VII-2001, malaise trap, J. Cantillo ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 1–13-VII-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 15–30-VII-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 21-IX/ 8-X-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same locality, collector and trap type, 8–23-X-2001 ( IAvH) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♂♂, 41 Km. S. Sta. Marta, Magd. , 2–4-V-1973, 7000ft, Howden & Campbell ( EMUS) ; 1 ♂, same data, V-10-1973 ( EMUS) .
Distribution. Colombia ( Fig. 52A View FIGURE 52 , Appendix I).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |