Bathycrinus sp.

Roux, Michel, Thuy, Ben & Gale, Andy S., 2025, Plio-Pleistocene deep-sea crinoid (Echinodermata) diversity from the western Rodrigues Ridge, Indian Ocean, revealed by microfossil evidence, Zootaxa 5583 (3), pp. 509-525 : 518-519

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5583.3.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6BC5024-7577-46A6-A1C3-F6B2BEBF1C5D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14852756

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD212E-C11E-0C72-FF29-4C99FECBFE41

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bathycrinus sp.
status

 

? Bathycrinus sp.

Fig. 6A–B View FIGURE 6

Material examined: one basal circlet ( OPH210 ) , two axillary brachial (IBr2ax) ( OPH211 ) .

Description: Basals fused, aboral face slightly concave with an irregular radiate crenularium ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ), adoral face convex slightly granulose without trace of pentagonal symmetry or nervous canal lumen and wide perilumen flat without granulation ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ); adoral diameter 1.47 mm, aboral diameter 1.02 mm, height 1.91 mm. Axillary brachial (IBr2ax) with aboral surface smooth, adoral face poorly preserved having a marked axial groove ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ), height 1.91 mm, maximum width 1.85 mm and proximal width 1.00 mm. Another similar but smaller IBr2ax with maximum width 1.30 mm.

Remarks: The shape of the basal ring and the absence of a conspicuous lumen of interradial nervous canals on the adoral face is usual in Bathycrinus , which sometimes shows a discrete pentalobate figure like in B. carpenteri (Danielssen & Koren 1877) ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). The radiate crenularium on the basal ring adoral face or on the proximal columnal facets has never been observed in bathycrinids and rhizocrinids. Monachocrinus differs in having free basals with conspicuous interradial nervous canal open on adoral face (Roux, in preparation). The adoral face of IBr2ax resembles those of Monachocrinus ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 ), but unfortunately the material is too poorly preserved for a more conclusive comparison. Pending additional material, the two ossicles described above are attributed to? Bathycrinus sp.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF