Spodochlamys keitai Kobayashi and Ratcliffe, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-77.1.120 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB53885A-36B5-4EC3-A63C-0B4A97336BFE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16324111 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/98807D14-6B85-4432-BA8A-1E3D4CA3EDE6 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:98807D14-6B85-4432-BA8A-1E3D4CA3EDE6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spodochlamys keitai Kobayashi and Ratcliffe |
status |
sp. nov. |
Spodochlamys keitai Kobayashi and Ratcliffe View in CoL , new species
zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:98807D14-6B85-4432-BA8A-1E3D4CA3EDE6 ( Figs. 1–2 View Fig View Fig )
Type Material. Holotype labeled “ COLOMBIA / Boyacá, / Otanche, / III-2021 ” and with our red holotype label ( Fig. 2F View Fig ) . Three paratypes with the same data and each with our red paratype label . Holotype deposited at the University of Nebraska State Museum ( UNSM), Lincoln , Nebraska, USA. One paratype was deposited at the Natural History Museum ( NHMUK), London, England, and two paratypes in the Keita Maruyama personal collection ( KMC), Tokyo, Japan.
Description of Holotype. Male ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A–F View Fig ). Length 27.0 mm; width across humeri 10.1 mm. Color: Head, pronotum, elytra, and tibiae reddish brown with shiny, metallic copper reflections; scutellar shield shiny metallic green ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); pygidium, venter and femora shiny reddish brown. Elytra lacking waxy bloom. Head: Head completely, densely rugulopunctate. Clypeal apex (dorsal view) broadly semicircular, rounded ( Fig. 1A View Fig ), weakly reflexed; surface (frontal view) with upper and lower margins subparallel. Labrum at middle 3 times wider than venter of clypeal apex ( Fig. 2B View Fig ), apex broadly, weakly subacute; surface with minute, sparse, setigerous punctures, setae short and pale. Mentum slightly tumescent with faint longitudinal depression from apex to middle of disc ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Interocular width equals 3.8 transverse eye diameters. Antenna with club subequal in length to entire stem. Pronotum: Form evenly convex in lateral view. Surface completely, densely, coarsely rugopunctate, becoming more so toward slightly explanate lateral margins. Lateral margin evenly rounded, weakly crenulate ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Basal margin with complete bead. Length at middle 1.6 times longer than frons. Scutellar shield: Surface densely rugulopunctate, glabrous. Elytra: Surface completely, densely, coarsely rugopunctate, rugae becoming larger and transverse laterally. Striae completely absent. Epipleuron (ventral view; Fig. 2A View Fig ) slightly concave, broad at base and gradually tapering apically, glabrous. Apex at suture nearly right angled. Apical umbone well developed, conical ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2E View Fig ). Pygidium: Surface shiny, with minute, sparse, shallow punctures, glabrous. Form in lateral view strongly convex.Apical bead slender, slightly wider at middle. Venter: Mesoventrite not produced at apex. Meso- and metaventrite with long, dense, pale setae ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). Abdominal sternites with small, dense punctures. Legs: All tibiae coarsely rugopunctate. Protibia not elongate or curved, lacking ventroapical modification, inner margin straight ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); external margin tridentate, basal tooth slightly removed from apical teeth. Protarsal inner claw entire at apex; meso- and metatarsal inner claws minutely split at apices ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Protarsomere 5 with weak median tooth. Profemur not elongated, lacking ventromedial projection. Procoxa not ventrally produced and enlarged. Metafemur with posterior margin “normal”, not weakly produced posteriorly, not laminate. Meso- and metatibial apices truncate, upper angle acute ( Fig. 2e View Fig ). Metatibial apical spurs simple, acute ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). Parameres: Form symmetrical, long, slender ( Figs. 2C–D View Fig ).
Variation. The three male paratypes ( Figs. 1B–D View Fig ) do not differ from the holotype. Length: 27.8–31.4 mm.
Etymology. The specific epithet is named in honor of Keita Maruyama who provided the specimens for this study.
Distribution. Spodochlamys keitai is known only from Otanche in Boyacá Department, Western Boyacá Province, in northeastern Colombia. Otanche is at an elevation of 1,050 m and surrounded by tropical rain forest. The specimens were purchased by Mr. Keita Maruyama from a local collector in Colombia.
Temporal Distribution. March (4).
Diagnosis. Spodochlamys keitai is immediately distinguished by its remarkably long and slender parameres ( Figs. 2C–D View Fig ) that are unlike any other in the genus. It is further differentiated from other species of Spodochlamys based on the characters in the key. The female remains unknown and so cannot be characterized.
We have not included the four species described by Soula (2010) ( Spodochlamys peruvianus Soula , Spodochlamys lydiae Soula , Spodochlamys curoei Soula, and Spodochlamys jamesonae Soula ) in our key because Soula’s typically brief descriptions and images do not include some diagnostic characters, including the form of the labrum and whether all the claws are split or not; those are essential characters for our key. Based on available information, these species would go to couplet 9 in our key. The form of the parameres in Soula’s paper might distinguish those species, although S. curoei and S. jamesonae seem remarkably close to each other and Spodochlamys neitai Jameson and Ratcliffe , and S. peruvianus seems close to Spodochlamys feyeri Ohaus s ensu Jameson and Ratcliffe (2011), not Soula (2010).
In gestalt, S. keitai resembles S. curoei but differs in the following respects: 1) the surface adjacent to the elytral suture is more coarsely rugose and not finely punctate; 2) slender, hair-like setae on the parameres are completely absent; and 3) the parameres are more elongated and bi-arcuate.
Natural History. Nothing is known of the life history of S. keitai .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Rutelinae |
Tribe |
Anatistini |
Genus |