Bruggmanniella notatae Rodrigues & Maia, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2019-17 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15640457 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F66C5E-5F14-E959-F278-F9BFBF3B4931 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Bruggmanniella notatae Rodrigues & Maia |
status |
sp. nov. |
Bruggmanniella notatae Rodrigues & Maia new species urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:008CFD54-36DA-47AD-BBF8-FDFBE9CF4903 . ( Figs. 2 View Figures 2 and 3 View Figures 3 )
Diagnosis. Palpus three-segmented, male hypoproct bilobed, ovipositor rigid portion 3.1 length of 7 th sternite, antennal horns 0.11-0.18 mm long with micro serrated margin, prothoracic integument grainy, spatula four-toothed.
Adult. Body length: 1.90 mm in male (n = 1); 2.30 – 2.20 mm in female (n = 2). Head ( Fig. 4a View Figures 4 ): eye connate in vertex, facets circular closely approximated. Antenna: scape obconic, 1.16 times length of pedicel; pedicel globose; flagellomeres cylindrical with bare necks in both sexes, first flagellomere equal in length to the second one in male (n = 2), and 1.3 times longer in female (n = 2). Male flagellomeres ( Fig.4b View Figures 4 ) with slightly wavy circumfila and female flagellomeres ( Fig. 4c View Figures 4 ) with two connected ring-like circumfila. Frontoclypeus with at least 23 setae (n = 1). Labrum elongated, apex triangular. Hypopharynx elongated, apex rounded, longer than labrum, apically.Labella riniform, with short mesal setae and few lateral setae. Palpi setose, three-segmented: first segment short and ovoid; second segment cylindrical, 2 times length of the first; third segment elongated and cylindrical, 2.0 times length of the second.
Thorax: Wing length: 1.75 mm in male (n = 1), and 1.85 – 1.95 mm in female (n = 2); R 5 joining C beyond wing apex. Anepimeron setose. Another pleura bare. Tarsal claws simple, curved beyond 2/3 basal, empodia as long as bending claws ( Fig. 4d View Figures 4 ).
Male abdomen ( Fig.4e View Figures 4 ): 1 st – 7 th tergites rectangular with a posterior row of setae, lateral row of setae, one anterior pair of trichoid sensilla, and elsewhere with scattered setulae. 8 th tergite not sclerotized with one anterior pair of trichoid sensilla. 1 st – 7 th sternites rectangular with a posterior row of setae, lateral row of setae, some mesal setae, one anterior pair of trichoid sensilla, and elsewhere covered with setulae. 8 th sternite rectangular setose and covered with setulae. Terminalia ( Fig. 4f View Figures 4 ): gonocoxite cylindrical setose, about 3.1 times length of gonostylus; gonostylus ovoid setose with some long setae, gonostylus teeth triangular, in lateral view; cerci wide setose, lobes ovoid divergent, with setae only apically; hypoproct setose slightly bilobed, with a pair of setae apically, slightly longer than cercus; aedeagus triangular narrow pointed at apex, almost as long as hypoproct.
Female abdomen ( Fig. 4g View Figures 4 ): 1 st – 7 th tergites rectangular with a posterior row of setae, lateral row of setae, one pair of trichoid sensilla. 8 th tergite with scattered setulae. 1 st – 6 th sternites rectangular with a posterior row of setae, lateral row of setae, some mesal setae, one pair of trichoid sensilla, and elsewhere covered with setulae. 7 th sternite rectangular with apex rounded, about 2.2 times length of preceding sternite, rectangular, more sclerotized at distal margin, with scattered setae and two basal trichoid sensilla. 8 th sternite unsclerotized.Ovipositor: base tubular, rigid portion with 3.1 times length of 7 th sternite.
Pupa. Body length: 2.31 – 2.73 mm (n = 6). Cephalic region ( Fig. 5a View Figures 5 ): antennal horns concave laterally, with micro-serrated margin, 0.11 – 0.18 mm of length (n = 6); cephalic setae 0.075 – 0.085 mm of length (n = 6); two pairs of lower lateral papillae (one setose and the other bare); three pairs of lateral papillae (two setose and one bare); upper facial margin thickened laterally; apical plate integument smooth ( Fig. 5b View Figures 5 ). Prothoracic spiracle cylindrical and elongated, slightly curved, 0.17 – 0.23 mm of length (n= 6) ( Figs. 5a and b View Figures 5 ). Prothoracic integument grainy as in the Fig. 5b View Figures 5 . 3 View Figures 3 rd – 9 th abdominal segments with numerous dorsal spines ( Fig. 5c View Figures 5 ). Abdominal spiracles conical on 4 th – 7 th segments, length of abdominal spiracle 5: 0.03 – 0.05 mm (n= 6). Terminal segment bilobed in males ( Fig. 5d View Figures 5 ) and rounded with a slightly reentrance in females, with dorsal spines.
Larva. white, body cylindrical, rounded anteriorly and tapered to end, length: 1.52 mm (n = 1), integument grainy. Prothoracic spatula length: 0.20 mm (n = 1), width: 0.07 mm (n = 1); four-toothed, internal teeth slightly longer than the external one; surrounding area pigmented; three setose lateral papillae at each side ( Fig. 5e View Figures 5 ). Terminal segment rounded without visible papillae.
Material examined. Holotype: Male, BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, Mangaratiba city, Ilha da Marambaia, Armação beach , 21.xi.2010, Rodrigues, A. R. col.. Paratypes: same locality, data and collector: 2 females, 1 pupa, 5 pupal exuvia, and 1 larva .
Gall. on fruits of Ocotea notata ( Lauraceae ), ovoid, yellow-green, glabrous, one-chambered, with a single larva inside, pupation in the gall ( Fig. 1b View Figure 1 ). Fruit with gall similar to healthy fruit. Occurrence from October to December of 2010.
Etymology. The specific name is the genitive of the host plant species.
Remarks. Bruggmanniella . notatae sp. nov. and B. persae Gagné, 2004 are unique among the other congeneric species in having larva with sclerotized area around the prothoracic spatula, but the former differs by having prothoracic spatula with all teeth acute and pupal antennal horns strongly concave laterally, while the latter has the prothoracic spatula with mesal teeth less acute than the lateral and pupal antennal horns strongly concave laterally.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |