Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) laticornis Rondani, 1857

Bot, Sander, Mengual, Ximo, Meutter, Frank Van de & Skevington, Jeffrey H., 2025, Review of the genus Cheilosia Meigen, 1822 (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Caucasus, with the description of 14 new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 1023, pp. 1-181 : 78

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1023.3097

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70585BDD-5981-4967-A09C-543CE5D7C717

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17442645

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F19912-AF18-FF83-FE3C-FC95F9A979C2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) laticornis Rondani, 1857
status

 

Cheilosia ( Convocheila) laticornis Rondani, 1857 View in CoL

Fig. 39

Cheilosia laticornis Rondani, 1857: 160 View in CoL .

Cheilosia latifacies Loew, 1858: 593 View in CoL . Syn. by Claussen & Thompson (1996).

Cheilosia latifacies View in CoL – Stackelberg & Richter 1968: 246. — Stackelberg 1970: 58. — Peck 1988: 107. — Barkalov 1993: 712.

Cheilosia latifacies Loew, 1846 View in CoL [sic] – Gujabidze 2002: 246.

Cheilosia laticornis View in CoL – Barkalov & Mutin 2018: 484. — Mengual et al. 2020: 22. — Speight 2020a: 39.

Differential diagnosis

Cheilosia laticornis belongs to the subgenus Convocheila . One of the distinctive characters of the subgenus is the pilosity on the face: long pilose along parafacia in dorsal one third of face. In the males of Convocheila the ventral lobe of the postgonite is sickle-shaped (the male genitalia of C. laticornis are figured in Radenković et al. 2020). Within the Caucasus, the only other member of the subgenus Convocheila is C. cumanica . The male of C. laticornis can be easily distinguished from that of C. cumanica by the bare eye (eye pilose in C. cumanica ), the female has the occiput with long white pile only (besides white pile, also with few long black pile in C. cumanica ) and scutellum on posterior margin with weak yellow setae (with robust black setae in C. cumanica ).

Material examined

Species not collected.

Genetics

The DNA barcodes of C. laticornis from Europe cluster together with high support (BS = 100%).

Remarks

The name Cheilosia latifacies Loew usually appears in the literature as published in 1857. Claussen & Thompson (1996) explain the evidence to date this work in 1858 and, consequently, argue the precedence of C. laticornis Rondani as a senior synonym.

Distribution

Western and Central Europe, Caucasus ( Armenia, Azerbaijan).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Syrphidae

SubFamily

Eristalinae

Genus

Cheilosia

Loc

Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) laticornis Rondani, 1857

Bot, Sander, Mengual, Ximo, Meutter, Frank Van de & Skevington, Jeffrey H. 2025
2025
Loc

Cheilosia laticornis

Mengual X. & Bot S. & Chkhartishvili T. & Reimann T. & Thormann J. & von der Mark L. 2020: 22
Speight M. C. D. 2020: 39
Barkalov A. V. & Mutin V. 2018: 484
2018
Loc

Cheilosia latifacies

Gujabidze M. 2002: 246
2002
Loc

Cheilosia latifacies

Barkalov A. V. 1993: 712
Peck L. V. 1988: 107
Stackelberg A. A. 1970: 58
Stackelberg A. A. & Richter V. A. 1968: 246
1968
Loc

Cheilosia latifacies

Loew H. 1858: 593
1858
Loc

Cheilosia laticornis

Rondani C. 1857: 160
1857
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF