Andrewesia apicalis ( Chaudoir, 1872 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.26107/RBZ-2025-0017 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D47F1347-6461-4709-B672-AA54F56C5E50 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F187F8-FFC6-FFB0-FC23-F9368463FE7F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Andrewesia apicalis ( Chaudoir, 1872 ) |
status |
|
Andrewesia apicalis ( Chaudoir, 1872) View in CoL
Odacantha apicalis Chaudoir, 1872: 408 View in CoL .
Arame obesa Andrewes, 1923: 220 View in CoL [new synonym].
Remarks. Both Andrewesia apicalis ( Chaudoir, 1872) and Andrewesia obesa ( Andrewes, 1923) were described from Singapore. Andrewes (1923) was seemingly not aware of A. apicalis when he described A. obesa from Singapore. Liebke (1938) felt that only one species might be involved: “I have not seen the type, but from Chaudoir’s very detailed description it appears that it is at least closely related to A. obesa , if not the same species”. I have checked the type of A. apicalis in MNHN, and can confirm that it is the same as the type of A. obesa in NHML (an image of the cotype of the latter is available from the Biodiversity of Singapore archive: https://singapore.biodiversity.online/).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Andrewesia apicalis ( Chaudoir, 1872 )
Cheong, Loong Fah 2025 |
Arame obesa
Andrewes HE 1923: 220 |
Odacantha apicalis
Chaudoir M 1872: 408 |