Artemia cf. sinica Cai, 1989
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5497.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87B27D58-7812-44D7-92AF-B72A4A6E040B |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13617995 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F14366-F04A-FFAF-FF45-D523F8AAF8BF |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Artemia cf. sinica Cai, 1989 |
| status |
|
Artemia cf. sinica Cai, 1989 View in CoL
( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , Figs. 4 A, B View FIGURE 4 )
Description. Male. Body length 6.5–9.5 mm. Distal segment of second antenna widened, subtriangular ( Fig. 2A, B View FIGURE 2 ). Apophyses subspherical, with evenly spaced small solitary spines ( Figs. 2B, C View FIGURE 2 ).
Eleven thoracic somites, each bears a pair of limbs. Limbs have a basically similar structure: a single leaf-like pre-epipodite; an epipodite; exopodite and endopodite bearing a single row of feathered setae; endites with two rows of setae ( Figs. 2D, G View FIGURE 2 ). Endites 3–5 subconical; endites 1 and 2 spatulate, endite 1 wider than endite 2. Thoracic limb I with a short, ovoid exopodite and a short, wide endopodite, bearing similar feathered setae progressively elongating towards their distal ends ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Endite 5 with a single seta of outer row and two long thick setae of the inner row; endite 4 with two outer setae subequal in size and two inner setae; endite 3 with two outer setae, one 3–3.5 times longer than the other, and three inner setae of similar size and structure ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Endite 2 bears two outer spines on its dorsal margin, one of them very short ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); endite 1 with two small spines and a large thick spinulated seta in the center of the inner margin of endite ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ).
Thoracic limb V with an inner part of endopodite armed by thick scraper-like setae increasing in length towards the distal end ( Fig. 2G View FIGURE 2 ). General structure and armature of the endites are similar to that of the limb I. Gonopod relatively short ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ), basal portion bearing an acute spine armed distally with short spinulae ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ); eversible portion ventrally with a row of spines along the midline ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ).
Female. Body length 5.5–11 mm. General structure of the thoracic limbs conforms to that of the male. Egg pouch subtriangular, inflated laterally, with a short distal outgrowth. Ventral surface with two symmetrical spines mediolaterally ( Fig. 2J View FIGURE 2 ). Cyst size 0.22–0.255 mm, cyst surface almost smooth ( Figs. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ).
Remarks. The species was previously reported from the same locality (Lake Chukurkul, Tajik Pamir) as Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758) . The morphological differentiation within Artemia is rather difficult ( Mura & Brecciaroli 2004; Sainz-Escudero et al. 2021), thus discriminant analysis or molecular methods usually are applied for identification ( Sainz-Escudero et al. 2021; Zheng & Sun 2023). Several Artemia species are known from Asia, including A. salina (Linnaeus, 1758) , A. sinica Cai, 1989 , A. tibetiana Abatzopoulos et al., 1998 , A. murae Naganawa & Mura, 2017 , and A. urmiana Günther, 1899 ( Litvinenko et al. 2009; Naganawa & Mura 2017). The observed population is clearly distinct from A. salina in having subsphaerical apophyses and spine-like projections on basal part of the gonopod. Also, it differs from A. murae , A. tibetiana and A. urmiana by armature of the apophysis; from A. tibetiana and A. urmiana by form of the gonopod basal process ( Mura & Brecciaroli 2004; Naganawa & Mura 2017); from A. tibetiana by smaller cyst diameter ( 0.22–0.25 mm versus 0.3– 0.25 mm in A. tibetiana, Abatzopoulos et al. 1998 ). A. sinica was observed in China ( Shanxi, Hebei, Inner Mongolia) and Tyva ( Van Stappen, 2002; Litvinenko et al. 2009; Naganawa & Mura 2017). However, the presence of A. salina in Tajikistan cannot still be excluded. In Tajikistan, the populations of Artemia were found in several hyperhaline lakes in Pamir ( Werestschagin 1923; Akhrorov 2001; this study, loc. 34). For more information on morphology of A. sinica , see Mura & Brecciaroli (2004); Zheng & Sun (2008).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
