Girardia, Ball, 1974
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v41.e23101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D8BEB0A-C3EF-4EF3-9955-92D30FD62A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF326F-FFB7-FF9B-B4A0-FB5F1D101E4A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Girardia |
status |
|
Diversity of Girardia View in CoL in Cuba
Our results show that at least three different species of Girardia inhabit the eastern region of the island of Cuba. In the San Juan River was identified the presence of G. sinensis ( Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ), a species for which there is a record from the western region of the archipelago ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), also based on a molecular study ( BenÍtez-Álvarez et al. 2023b). This is the first record of the species in the eastern region of Cuba. Girardia sinensis was originally described from China ( Chen et al. 2015), but later it was found to be an invasive species and it was concluded that it originated from North America and had been recently introduced worldwide by human activities ( BenÍtez-Álvarez et al. 2023a, 2023b). Up to date, Cuba is the only known record of G. sinensis in The Americas ( BenÍtez-Álvarez et al. 2023b) and Cuba is situated on the south border of the North American plate ( Iturralde-Vinent and MacPhee 1999, Iturralde-Vinent and Macphee 2023). Taking into account the high dispersal potential of this species ( BenÍtez-Álvarez et al. 2023a) and the complex geology of the American continent, at the moment it is not possible to establish whether the species is autochthonous to the island or may have arrived transported by human activities or animals.
The specimens coming from the Duaba ( Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ) and Nima Nima rivers ( Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ), respectively, constitute sister groups; however, the long branches separating them in the trees are indicative of a high genetic differentiation, which suggest they are two different species. These two species were sampled in localities near those of eastern Cuba where Codreanu and Balcesco (1973) described G. cubana and, therefore, one of the two molecularly identified species in the present work may correspond to G. cubana ( Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 ). A morphological analysis is needed to corroborate whether any of the populations of both localities show the characteristics defined for G. cubana . However, the lack of type material or designation of a type locality in the original description of the species, together with the fact that the morphology of the copulatory apparatus of G. cubana from most of the localities was not analyzed ( Codreanu and Balcesco 1973), renders the classification of new specimens as G. cubana difficult. We suggest designating Topes de Collantes on Central Cuba as type locality for G. cubana , since the only anatomical description of the reproductive systems belongs to specimens from that locality ( Codreanu and Balcesco 1973).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.