Chilo luteellus (Motschulsky, 1866)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.18061/bssb.v3i2.9527 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15117085 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDD027-FF9E-C857-7799-6741FB39E219 |
treatment provided by |
Jonas |
scientific name |
Chilo luteellus (Motschulsky, 1866) |
status |
|
Chilo luteellus (Motschulsky, 1866) View in CoL
Figs. 36 View Figs 32-39 , 97 View Figs 94-99 , 155 View Figs 152-155 .
Schoenobius luteellus Motschulsky, 1866: 199 . Type locality: Japan, Honshu, Kanagawa Pref., Kugenuma, Fujisawa
= Chilo concolorellus Christoph, 1885 , in Romanoff: 149, pl. 8 figs. 15a, b; type locality: Turkmenistan, Askhabad.
= Chilo gensanellus Leech, 1889: 108 , pl. 5 fig. 9; type locality: Korea, Gensan.
= Chilo dubia Bethune-Baker, 1894: 48 , pl. 1 figs. 18, 19; type locality: Egypt, Alexandria.
= Chilo boxanus Hering, 1903: 111 ; type locality: China, Yangtse.
= Chilo plumbosellus Chrétien, 1910: 366 ; type locality: Algeria, Biskra.
= Chilo molydellus Zerny in Osthelder, 1935: 79; type locality: Syria, Amanus, Juksek Dagh.
= Chilo pseudoplumbellus Caradja, 1932: 117 ; type locality: China, Tianjin.
= Chilo luteellus (Motschulsky) : Shibuya, 1928: 144.
MATERIAL
1 ♂, 2 ♀ (detailed information on Table S1; https://doi.org/ 10.5061/dryad.b8gtht7mh) .
SIMILAR SPECIES
Chilo pulverosellus Ragonot, 1895 .
DIAGNOSIS
Chilo luteellus ( Fig. 36 View Figs 32-39 ) is a rather large species (♂: 10 mm, ♀: 13-14 mm) and has somewhat broader forewings than other large Chilo species. Unambiguous identification succeeds by examination of the genitalia. In male genitalia ( Fig. 97 View Figs 94-99 ), the two elongate arms of the juxta and the absence of ventral arm on phallus separate this species and C. pulverosellus from other Chilo species. From C. pulverosellus , it is separated by the valva shape, which is more triangular than in C. pulverosellus , and the tips of the juxtal arms have a short tooth missing in C. pulverosellus (note that C. pulverosellus is not reported from the Philippines). In female genitalia ( Fig. 155 View Figs 152-155 ), the following characters distinguish this species from congeneric species: ductus bursae with basal half sclerotized, distally indented, abutted by two sclerotized lobes at ductus midlength; distinct swelling at midlength; ductus distal half wrinkled, with punctuate membrane; corpus bursae with light sclerotized ring at corpus opening; signum lacking ( Anon 2019; Bleszynski, 1970c).
DISTRIBUTION
ALGERIA; CHINA; CROATIA; ISRAEL; ITALY; JAPAN; PHILIPPINES: Luzon (Laguna), Mindoro, Negros; ROMANIA; RUSSIA; SPAIN ( Bleszynski, 1970c; Koren, 2021; Poltavsky & Artokhin, 2015). Collected at an altitude of 150 m on the Philippines. Bleszynski (1970c) reports the species from North Africa and Central Asia. He investigated one female specimen from the USNM collected on Mount Makiling (Laguna).
DNA BARCODING
A maximum intraspecific p-distance of 1.0 % is observed between specimens MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL07-C08 from Mindoro and MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL10-H09 from Negros. Three haplotypes were recovered in total from the Philippines. Of the three DNA barcodes available for this species, the haplotype from Shandong, China, is recovered as the closest neighbor, while the two other haplotype from Italy are more distantly related (Fig. S2f).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Crambinae |
Genus |
Chilo luteellus (Motschulsky, 1866)
Léger, Théo 2024 |
Chilo molydellus
Zerny 1935 |
Chilo pseudoplumbellus
Caradja 1932: 117 |
Chilo plumbosellus Chrétien, 1910: 366
Chretien 1910: 366 |
Chilo boxanus
Hering 1903: 111 |
Chilo dubia
Bethune-Baker 1894: 48 |
Chilo gensanellus
Leech 1889: 108 |
Chilo concolorellus
Christoph 1885 |
Schoenobius luteellus
Motschulsky 1866: 199 |