Acroceratitis Hendel, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8297E11-ECD4-440F-A656-CF1E58E905A4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15562045 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC87A6-FFCA-B645-54F2-FD55EDA8FAC2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acroceratitis Hendel |
status |
|
Genus Acroceratitis Hendel View in CoL
Acroceratitis Hendel, 1913: 82 View in CoL .
Type species Acroceratitis plumosa Hendel View in CoL , by original designation.
Stictaspis Bezzi, 1913: 102 View in CoL .
Type species Stictaspis ceratitina Bezzi View in CoL , by original designation.
Diagnosis. Fruit flies of genus Acroceratitis are characterized by the presence of a dorsoapically pointed first flagellomere with plumose arista, head higher than long, wings with yellow to brown bands with orange-yellow or yellow patches, sometimes apically diffuse, and with the transverse band from pterostigma enclosing r-m crossvein, one apical spine on midtibia, male with enlarged abdominal tergite 2, female with two spermathecae comprised of tightly set coils ( Hancock & Drew, 1999). Additionally, the proctiger in males is 2−3 times larger than the epandrium and densely covered with fine hairs, which can be considered a synapomorphy for the genus.
Key to species of genus Acroceratitis Hendel View in CoL
1. Wing with costal band interrupted in cell r 1 at apex of cell sc by a complete transverse hyaline band across wing ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19−21 ).. 2
- Wing with costal band entire or interrupted well beyond apex of cell sc ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1−2 , 17 View FIGURE 17 , 18)........................... 3
2. Scutellum predominantly black with yellow spots at bases of basal and apical scutellar setae; mid and hind femora fulvous ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19−21 ).................................................................................. A. tomentosa Hardy View in CoL
- Scutellum predominantly black with yellow spots only at bases of basal scutellar setae; mid and hind femora dark fuscous ( David et al., 2014; fig. 21)........................................................... A. histrionica (Meijere) View in CoL
3. Wing with costal band extending from cell sc to wing apex, cell r 1 without a medial hyaline patch; postpronotal lobe often with a large black spot; abdomen without paired submedial spots on tergites 3−5 ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1−2 ).............................. 4
- Wing cell r 1 with a medial hyaline patch and pattern often apically diffuse; postpronotal lobe without a large black spot; abdomen with paired submedial spots on tergites 3−5 ( Figs 17 View FIGURE 17 , 18)............................................. 13
4. Scutellum with three black patches separated by yellow lines ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19−21 )............................................ 5
- Scutellum black apically with or without yellow spots but without yellow longitudinal lines ( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 5−9 , 20 View FIGURES 19−21 ).................9
5. Scutum predominantly fulvous without black or brown markings except for black posterolateral spots ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 10)........................................................................ A. septemmaculata Hardy View in CoL
- Scutum brown with prominent postsutural lateral vittae and presutural yellow markings.............................. 6
6. Medial black spot on scutellum broad, reaching the base of scutum ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 1).... A. bilineata (Meijere) View in CoL
- Medial black spot on scutellum as high as or slightly higher than as lateral spots but not reaching the scutum............. 7
7. Subapical band along dm-cu crossvein fused with costal band ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19−21 ); postpronotal black spot large.... A. ceratitina (Bezzi) View in CoL
- Subapical band along dm-cu crossvein separate and not fused with costal band ( David et al., 2020; fig. 16); postpronotal black spot small or absent................................................................................... 8
8. Abdominal tergite 3 black or brown; postpronotal lobe with a small ventral spot ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 11)............................................................................................. A. siamensis Munro View in CoL
- Abdominal tergite 3 fulvous; postpronotal lobe without spot ( David et al., 2020; figs. 13, 15).......... A. incompleta Hardy View in CoL
9. Postpronotal lobe yellow without black spot; abdominal tergite 3 entirely blackish brown ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 13) (males unknown)............................................................ A. tenmalaica Hancock & Drew View in CoL
- Postpronotal lobe yellow with a large black spot ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 1−2 , 3 View FIGURES 3−4 ); abdominal tergite 3 fulvous or blackish brown..............10
10. Abdominal tergite 3 fulvous ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1−2 )...................................................................11
- Abdominal tergite 3 black/ brown ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19−21 )................................................................ 12
11. Scutellum black without yellow spots at bases of apical scutellar setae; abdominal tergite 3 yellow/fulvous; oviscape as long as or slightly longer than abdomen ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1−2 )............................. A. sachini David, Hancock & Noor , sp. nov.
- Scutellum black with two yellow spots at bases of apical scutellar setae ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 12); oviscape shorter than abdomen............................................................................. A. striata (Froggatt) View in CoL
12. Oviscape short (0.85 mm); wing with subapical and posterior apical bands fused ( David et al., 2014; figs. 16, 17) (males unknown)........................................................... A. breviscapa David, Ramani & Hancock
- Oviscape longer (1.47 mm); wing with subapical and posterior apical bands not fused ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19−21 ).................................................................................................. A. parastriata David & Hancock
13. Scutellum predominantly yellow without any black markings; all femora black; face black ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 8).................................................................................... A. nigrifacies Meijere View in CoL
- Scutellum yellow with three apical black markings ( Figs. 17 View FIGURE 17 , 18, 22); femora fulvous or mid and hind femur with black markings; face fulvous.................................................................................14
14. Wing with transverse hyaline band complete, apical area without diffused pattern ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 ).......................... 15
- Wing with transverse hyaline band interrupted, broken into a series of spots; apical area with diffused pattern............17
15. Scutum predominantly reddish brown, with reduced black area except for a medial longitudinal band; fore and mid femora predominantly fulvous, mid femur with ventral preapical spot ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 )........................... A. separata (Bezzi) View in CoL
- Scutum with extensive black area; mid and hind femora with extensive fuscous markings........................... 16
16. Scutellum with medial spot larger than lateral ones; mid and hind femora black ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 9)............................................................................................... A. plumosa Hendel View in CoL
- Scutellum with medial spot not larger than lateral ones; mid and hind femora with fuscous markings, not black ( Hancock & Drew, 1999; fig. 5)................................................................ A. hardyi Hancock & Drew View in CoL
17. Aculeus apically rounded ( Fig. 26c View FIGURES 26−28 ), glans of phallus with well developed sclerotisation ( Fig. 25c View FIGURES 23−25 )........ A. distincta (Zia)
- Aculeus apically acute ( Fig. 26a View FIGURES 26−28 ), glans of phallus weakly sclerotised ( Fig. 25a View FIGURES 23−25 )...................... A. bimacula Hardy View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Acroceratitis Hendel
David, K. J., Noor Mahammed, N. R., Hancock, D. L., Gracy, R. G., Ningthoujam, Kennedy & Sushil, S. N. 2025 |
Acroceratitis
Hendel, F. G. 1913: 82 |
Stictaspis
Bezzi, M. 1913: 102 |