Epacanthaclisis banksi Krivokhatsky, 1998
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5657.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:01A734E6-8A47-4856-A7C2-734CC78E51B6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15823449 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB87D8-FFBA-9C3D-56FF-FB98FE04FBD2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epacanthaclisis banksi Krivokhatsky, 1998 |
status |
|
Epacanthaclisis banksi Krivokhatsky, 1998 View in CoL
( Figs. 2O View FIGURE 2 , 39A–B View FIGURE 39 , 40–43 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 , 49A View FIGURE 49 , 53G–H View FIGURE 53 , 54G–H View FIGURE 54 , 55D View FIGURE 55 )
Epacanthaclisis banksi Krivokhatsky, 1998: 47 View in CoL (type locality: China: Sichuan, “Ts’Ao Po” = [Aba, Wenchuan County, Yanmen Township, near Qingpo Village]; holotype in USNM). Flint, 2002: 96 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Stange, 2004: 88 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Ao et al., 2010: 49 View Cited Treatment ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Cheng et al., 2015: 1 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL , molecular). Michel et al., 2017: 108 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL , phylogeny, using a data of Chen et al. 2015). Wang et al., 2018: 47 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Yang et al., 2018: 62 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Yang et al., 2023: 777 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ).
Epacanthaclisis amydrovittata Wan & Wang View in CoL in Ao et al., 2010: 51 View Cited Treatment (type locality: China: Gansu, Gannan, Thebo (Diebu) County, Lazikou Town; holotype in CAU). Wang et al., 2018: 47 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Yang et al., 2018: 62 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). Yang et al., 2023: 776 ( Epacanthaclisis View in CoL ). syn. nov.
Diagnosis. Adult: Scape and pedicel pale yellowish-brown; flagellum mostly pale yellowish-brown on basal part and gradually darken distally, non-swollen flagellomeres each with a dark circular marking. Pronotum pale yellowish-brown, medially with a pair of adjacent longitudinal dark brown stripes; laterally with a pair of short dark lines (sometimes discontinuous); lateral margin black. Forewing rhegma mostly as an oblique dark brown line, sometimes indistinct. Male abdominal terga 3–4 mostly pale yellow; tergum 5 medially with an indistinct brownish marking, anteromedial margin with a pair of tufts of bristles; abdominal terga 6–8 pale yellow and brown. Male external gonocoxites 9 curved in ventral view, subtriangular in cephalic view; internal gonocoxites 9 nearly trapezoid, external margin rounded in cephalic view; gonocoxites 11 arrow-shaped in caudal view. Female posterior branches of gonocoxites 8 short digitiform, concave internally, covered with long setae; gonapophyses 8 slender ribbon-shaped, internally sharp. 3rd instar larva: Body pale to pale yellowish-brown. Head Longer than wide; dorsal head anteriorly with a pair of transversal short black band, medially with many dark dots, posteriorly with a pair of V-shaped dark brown markings; lateral head with a pair of irregular brown band; ventral head medially with a pair of adjacent brown markings, anterolateral and posterolateral margin each with a pair of brown spots, other part with dark dots. Anterior mesothoracic setiferous processes 1.25 times as long as the posterior pair; metathoracic setiferous processes relatively short, the posterior pair wider. Dorsal abdominal segments each medially with a pair of irregular dark brown markings and dozens dark dots.
Re-description of adult. Size. Head width: 3.12–3.17 mm; forewing length: 36.42–42.24 mm; hindwing length: 36.63–42.52 mm.
Head. Vertex pale yellowish-brown, two transversal dark brown bands present on anterior and posterior parts ( Fig. 40C View FIGURE 40 ). A black marking present on the insertion of antenna and anterior frons. Scape and pedicel pale yellowish-brown; flagellum mostly pale yellowish-brown on basal part and gradually darken distally, non-swollen flagellomeres each with a dark circular marking, swollen flagellum mostly dark brown. Frons generally pale yellowish-brown, black marking on anterior frons medially concave ( Fig. 40B View FIGURE 40 ). Clypeus pale yellowish-brown with a few setae. Labrum brown. Maxillary palpus generally pale yellowish-brown. Labial palpus pale yellowish-brown, distal segment fusiform and brown. Mandibles yellowish-brown with distal half dark reddish brown.
Thorax. Pale yellowish-brown and dark brown. Pronotum pale yellowish-brown, medially with a pair of adjacent longitudinal dark brown stripes; laterally with a pair of short dark lines (sometimes discontinuous); lateral margin black; laterally covered with a mixture of long pale and dark setae. Mesoprescutum generally black with a pair of lateral pale brown spots; mesonotum generally dark brown, laterally with a pair of pale yellowish-brown markings, a pair of longitudinal dark brown lines present on the pale yellowish-brown markings; mesoscutellum generally pale yellowish-brown, anteromedially with a pair of longitudinal dark brown markings. Metanotum dark brown and pale yellowish-brown ( Figs. 40B View FIGURE 40 , 43B–C View FIGURE 43 ). Pleurae generally pale yellowish-brown, with dark brown markings.
Legs. Covered with many pale and dark setae. All coxae pale yellowish-brown each with an indistinct dark spot; tibial spurs brown, barely curved; tarsomere 1 generally pale; tarsomere 2 pale, distally dark brown; tarsomeres 3–4 dark brown; tarsomere 5 generally pale, distally black, as long as entire length of tarsomeres 1–4; pretarsal claws slightly curved, protruded basally. Foreleg: Femur pale yellowish-brown, dorsally with a longitudinal dark brown stripe; tibia pale yellowish-brown, mediobasally and distally each with a dark brown marking, other part with some dark dots; tibial spur reaching tip of tarsomere 3. Midleg: Similar to foreleg. Hind leg: Femur pale yellowish-brown, distally brown; tibia mostly pale yellowish-brown, mediobasally and distally each with an indistinct dark brown marking; tibial spur reaching base of tarsomere 3; tarsomere 1 longer than that of fore- and midleg ( Fig. 40A View FIGURE 40 ).
Wings. Mostly hyaline, with some markings. Forewing as long as hindwing. Pterostigma pale. Forewing costal space with a dark brown marking proximad pterostigma; rhegma and the marking on basal cubital area various, sometimes as an oblique stripe, and sometimes indistinct; marginal cubital area with scattered dots; costal, distal half of prefork and basal half of posterior crossveins mostly connected by oblique veinlets; four to five presectoral crossveins present; RP with 11–12 branches; RP origin basal to MP fork, nearly align at CuA fork. Hindwing hyaline without marking; two presectoral crossvein present ( Figs. 39A–B View FIGURE 39 , 40A View FIGURE 40 , 43A View FIGURE 43 ).
Abdomen. Male tergum 1 pale yellow, posteriorly with a black marking; tergum 2 pale yellow, medially with a longitudinal black subtriangular stripe; terga 3–4 mostly pale yellow; tergum 5 swollen, medially with an indistinct brownish marking, anteromedial margin with a pair of tufts of bristles; abdominal terga 6–8 pale yellow and brown ( Figs. 2O View FIGURE 2 , 49A View FIGURE 49 ). Female terga 3–7 each laterally with a pair of dark brown stripes and posteromedially with a dark brown stripe ( Fig. 39B View FIGURE 39 ). Male genitalia. Sternum 9 wide, nearly bell-shaped, constricted on distal part, distal part covered with long setae ( Fig. 40E View FIGURE 40 ). External gonocoxites 9 strongly sclerotized externally, encased internal gonocoxites 9; external gonocoxites 9 curved in ventral view, subtriangular in cephalic and lateral view; internal gonocoxites 9 nearly trapezoid, external margin rounded in ventral view. Gonocoxites 11 arrow-shaped in caudal view; gonapophyses 11 tiny, H-shaped in ventral view ( Figs. 40H–L View FIGURE 40 ). Ectoproct long rectangular in dorsal view, rounded on distal margin, distal part covered with many curved stout setae ( Figs. 40D–E View FIGURE 40 ). Female genitalia. Pregenital plate tapered. Anterior branches of gonocoxites 8 weakly developed, tuberculate, covered with setae; posterior branches of gonocoxites 8 short digitiform, concave internally, covered with long setae; gonapophyses 8 slender ribbon-shaped, internally sharp. Gonocoxites 9 covered with short stout tapered setae. Ectoproct subtriangular in lateral view ( Figs. 40F–G View FIGURE 40 ).
Description of 3rd instar larva. Size. Body length (excluding mandible): 18.12–23.46 mm; head length: 5.43– 6.22 mm; head width: 5.07–5.85 mm; mandible length: 5.66–6.58 mm.
Head. Longer than wide. Clypeo-labrum generally brown, posterior margin with a pair of black markings; anterior margin covered with many pale dolichasters. Dorsal head anteriorly with a pair of transversal short black band, medially with many dark dots, posteriorly with a pair of V-shaped dark brown markings; lateral head with a pair of irregular brown band; ventral head medially with a pair of adjacent brown markings, anterolateral and posterolateral margin each with a pair of brown spots, other part with dark dots; covered with many dark setae. Ocular tubercle prominent, black. Antennae brown, long and thin. Mandible longer than head, basally with 9–10 interdental mandibular setae; first tooth shorter than second tooth; second tooth as long as third tooth; 2–3 short interdental mandibular setae between first and second teeth ( Figs. 42 View FIGURE 42 , 53G–H View FIGURE 53 ).
Thorax. Pronotum yellowish-brown, scattered with dozens dark dots, covered with tiny dark setae medially and long dark and pale setae laterally; mediolaterally with a pair of longitudinal short stripes, laterally with indistinct brown markings. Mesothorax with spiracles present on short stout brown sclerotized tubercle. Lateral meso- and metanotum each with two pairs of oblique dark brown stripes. Anterior mesothoracic setiferous processes 1.25 times as long as the posterior pair; metathoracic setiferous processes relatively short, posterior pair wider ( Figs. 42 View FIGURE 42 , 54G–H View FIGURE 54 ).
Legs. Foreleg short, without marking. Midleg longer than fore- and hind leg, tibia dorsally with a dark brown marking. Hind leg without marking ( Fig. 42C View FIGURE 42 ).
Abdomen. Pale to pale yellowish-brown. Each dorsal segment medially with a pair of irregular dark brown markings and dozens dark dots. Segments 1–6 each medially with a short dark brown stripe, gradually faded ( Fig. 42A View FIGURE 42 ); ventral segment 8 with a pair of dark brown markings. Each segment with a pair of small tubercular setiferous processes on lateral margin ( Fig. 42B View FIGURE 42 ). Segment 9 triangular, as long as wide; both dorsally and ventrally each with a pair of dark brown spots; short rastra with four pair of digging setae ( Fig. 55D View FIGURE 55 ).
Material examined. Adult: 1♀, CHINA: Gansu, Gannan, Thebo County [źǒ县], Lazikou Town [OiŦ口 ḍ], 1700 m, 12.VIII.1980, Chikun Yang (holotype of Epacanthaclisis amydrovittata Wan & Wang, 2010 ) ( CAU) . 1♀, CHINA: Gansu, Longnan, Kangxian County [Ṝ县], Qiujiaba [õẕ坝], 26.VII.2011, Xiao Zhang ( CAU) . 2♀, CHINA: Gansu, Longnan, Wenxian County [Ž县], Liujiaping County [刘ẕ坪乡], 2100 m, 27.VI.1998, Decheng Yuan ( CAU) . 3♂ 2♀, CHINA: Gansu, Longnan, Wenxian County, Baishuijiang National Natural Reserve [HAEȕ国ẕẘuḦ保ae区], Baimahe Station [HḶñạ], 2100 m, 26.VII.2011, Sipei Liu ( CAU) . 1♂, CHINA: Gansu, Gannan, Zhugqu County [Ḃs县], Chagang Township [ĒṄ乡], 1800 m, 12.VII.2018 ( CAU) . 1♂, reared from a pupa, CHINA: Sichuan, Aba, Lixian County [Ẵ县], Putou Town ["头ḍ], Sidanan Village [四大南ť], 1900 m, 12.V.2023, Yuchen Zheng ( CAU) . 1♂, CHINA: Sichuan, Aba , Jiuzhaigou County [九ḁŝ县], 1406 m, 2.VIII.2011, Sipei Liu ( CAU) . 2♂, same locality as above, 2050 m, 10.VII.2010, H.A. Coene & R. Vis ( RMNH) . 1♀, CHINA: Sichuan, Aba, Jiuzhaigou County, Nanping Town [南坪ḍ], 2000 m, 16.VII.1986, Gang Chen (paratype of Epacanthaclisis amydrovittata Wan & Wang, 2010 ) ( CAU) . 1♀, same information as above ( CAU) . 2♀, same location as above, VII.17.1986, Xiaochun Zhang ( CAU) . 1♂ 4♀, same location as above, 2–17.VII.2002, Fuming Shi ( CAU) . Larva: 1 1st instar larva preserved in 95% ethyl alcohol, CHINA: Aba , Wenchuan County [Ŕm县], Qiangrengu Valley [Ɩ人谷], Dongmen Kou [东LJ口], 1500 m, 11.V.2023, Yuchen Zheng ( CAU) . 1 2nd instar larva and 2 3rd instar larvae preserved in 95% ethyl alcohol, CHINA: Aba, Wenchuan County, Qiangrengu Valley , Longxi County [Īâ 乡], 1700 m, 11.V.2023, Yuchen Zheng ( CAU) . 3 3rd instar larvae preserved in 95% ethyl alcohol and 2 3rd instar larvae still rearing, CHINA: Sichuan, Aba , Lixian County, Bipenggou [Ẹȇŝ], 2200–2500 m, Yuchen Zheng ( CAU) .
Distribution. China (Gansu, Sichuan).
Biology. The larvae of E. banksi inhabit rocky platforms with deep thick sand, completely hidden themselves into the thick sand, ambushing preys. The habitat of this species is relatively restricted, occurring only in the microhabitat of the Longmenshan geological fault zone ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ).
Remarks. This species is similar to E. ningshana , but E. banksi can be distinguished from the latter by the dark line on pronotal pale yellowish-brown part shorter, the male abdominal terga 3–4 mostly pale yellow, the male tergum 5 medially with an indistinct brownish marking, the external margin of male internal gonocoxites 9 rounded, the angle of male internal gonocoxites 9 larger in ventral view, the female posterior goncoxites 8 short digitiform and concave internally, the female gonapophyses 8 slender ribbon-shaped and internally sharp, and the larval mandibular teeth and mesothoracic setiferous processes longer. In E. ningshana , the dark line on the pronotal pale yellowish-brown part is longer, the male abdominal tergum 3 has two pair of brown markings, the posterior male abdominal tergum 4 is brown, the male abdominal tergum 5 is generally brown, the external margin of male internal gonocoxites 9 are relatively straight, the angle of male internal gonocoxites 9 are smaller in ventral view, the female posterior goncoxites 8 are digitiform, the female gonapophyses 8 are wide transversal ribbon-shaped and internally curved, and the larval mandibular teeth and mesothoracic setiferous processes are shorter. Besides, there is geographical isolation between these two species: E. banksi is distributed only in the Qionglai and Minshan mountain ranges, whereas E. ningshana is found in the Qingling and Taihangshan mountain ranges.
Ao et al. (2010) published E. amydrovittata Wan & Wang, 2010 from Minshan mountain ranges with only two female specimens. Based on our comparison, the types of E. amydrovittata differs from the typical E. banksi only in the forewing rhegma, with all other characters being identical. However, E. banksi actually exhibits some variation in its wing markings ( Fig. 42 View FIGURE 42 ). We also examined some specimens of E. banksi with transitional wing markings similar to those of E. amydrovittata at the type locality of the latter. Hence, we treat E. amydrovittata as a junior synonym of E. banksi .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Epacanthaclisis banksi Krivokhatsky, 1998
Zheng, Yuchen, Badano, Davide, Aspöck, Ulrike, Aspöck, Horst, Hayashi, Fumio & Liu, Xingyue 2025 |
Epacanthaclisis amydrovittata
Yang, D. & Yang, X. K. & Liu, X. Y. 2023: 776 |
Wang, X. L. & Zhan, Q. B. & Wang, A. Q. 2018: 47 |
Yang, D. & Liu, X. Y. & Yang, X. K. 2018: 62 |
Ao, W. G. & Wan, X. & Wang, X. L. 2010: 51 |
Epacanthaclisis banksi
Yang, D. & Yang, X. K. & Liu, X. Y. 2023: 777 |
Wang, X. L. & Zhan, Q. B. & Wang, A. Q. 2018: 47 |
Yang, D. & Liu, X. Y. & Yang, X. K. 2018: 62 |
Michel, B. & Clamens, A. L. & Bethoux, O. & Kergoat, G. J. & Condamine, F. L. 2017: 108 |
Cheng, C. & Sun, X. & Gai, Y. & Hao, J. 2015: 1 |
Ao, W. G. & Wan, X. & Wang, X. L. 2010: 49 |
Stange, L. A. 2004: 88 |
Flint, O. S. 2002: 96 |
Krivokhatsky, V. A. 1998: 47 |