IDIOLABIS Alexander, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.26879/468 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16D2DF08-A8D8-482E-A9C9-F3928C14B46E |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA6763-A52C-FFD1-FE2A-221FFD7AFA2C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
IDIOLABIS Alexander, 1931 |
status |
|
Subgenus IDIOLABIS Alexander, 1931
Type species. Dactylolabis (Idiolabis) terebrella Alexander, 1931
Species Dactylolabis (Idiolabis) ryszardi n. sp.
Figures 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3
zoobank.org/ 107A6239-9A4A-49AE-A24E-0108DC43FBDE
Type material. Holotype: No. MP/3321 (male) Institute of Systematic and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences ( ISEA PAS).
KANIA & KRZEMIŃSKI: EOCENE CRANE FLY FROM BALTIC AMBER
Derivatio nominis. The specific name is dedicated to Prof. Ryszard Szadziewski, eminent specialist on fossil and recent Diptera .
Diagnosis. Vein Sc ending before the fork of Rs into R 2+3+4 and R 5; discal cell comparatively small, characteristically indented in upper distal corner by the position of dM 1+2 shifted to 1/3 of d cell. Cross-vein m-cu before fork of Mb into M 1+2 and M 3+4. Tergite IX without process, indented in the middle. Gonocoxite elongated, narrow basally; gonostyle very elongated, very tiny with short, wide, distinctly crenate process at base.
Description. The male specimen is almost entirely preserved, with wings not well preserved, very dis-
PALAEO- ELECTRONICA.ORG torted ( Figure 2.1 View FIGURE 2 ). Body brown, 7.30 mm long; wing length 9.76 mm; antenna 3.02 mm long.
Head: antenna ( Figures 1.3 View FIGURE 1 , 2.2 View FIGURE 2 ) 16-segmented, if bent backwards, it would reach the base of abdomen; scape long, cylindrical; pedicel not very elongated, rather cylindrical; flagellomeres elongated with several, usually four, setae (verticils) on each flagellomere equal or longer than the segments bearing them; apical flagellomere approximately half as long as penultimate one and widened in distal part with four elongated setae at apex; palpus ( Figures 1.2 View FIGURE 1 , 3.1 View FIGURE 3 ) 0.88 mm long, with the last segment as long as the penultimate one.
Wing ( Figure 1.4, 1.5 View FIGURE 1 ): slightly brown infuscate, vein Sc ending before the fork of Rs into R 2+3+4 and R 5; cross-vein sc-r at twice its length before the end of Sc; R 1 very long; Rs comparatively long; discal cell comparatively small, characteristically indented in upper distal corner by the position of dM 1+2 shifted to 1/3 of d cell; cross-vein m-cu before fork of Mb into M 1+2 and M 3+4; M 1 long, about two times dM 1+2; M 3 slightly longer than discal cell.
Hypopygium ( Figures 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 3.2 View FIGURE 3 ): 1.10 mm long, tergite IX without process, indented in the middle. Gonocoxite elongated, narrowed basally. Gonostylus very thin, strongly elongated, with short basal process, wide, distinct denticles at margin. Aedeagus protruding; parameres shorter than aedeagus.
Phylogenetic Analysis
The parsimony analysis yielded four trees 41 steps long, with consistency index 0.60, and retention index 0.75. The strict consensus tree ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ) and majority rule ( Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 ) present similar topologies, with a difference in resolution of extinct species Dactylolabis amberifiis + Dactylolabis viduus – not resolved in strict consensus (Nelsen) tree, but resolved in Majority Rule tree. The strict consensus tree revealed two main clades – clade B: [ Bothrophorus monstrosa + Coenolabis aberrans + Dactylolabis montana Eudactylolabis damula ] comprising representatives of extant subgenera and second clade – clade C, comprising species of extinct subgenera with exception of above mentioned two fossils from Baltic amber, placed originally in nominative subgenus Dactylolabis , but with relationships unresolved by the present analysis. Majority rule (cut off at 50) tree presents three clades, clade A: [ Dactylolabis amberifiis + Dactylolabis viduus ] supported by homoplasy, very light stigma, present also in clade comprising species of the genus Eolabis . Separation of this group from modern Dactylolabis montana could be due to missing data for the fossils. Clade B is partly solved: [ Coenolabis aberrans + Dactylolabis montana + [ Bothrophorus monstrosa + Eudactylolabis damula ]] and supported by two synapomorphies – compound eyes occupying more than half of lateral surface of head and presence of two tibial spurs. In the strict consensus tree clade B is supported by in addition by homoplastic feature – enlarged thorax.
Clade [ Bothrophorus monstrosa + Eudactylolabis damula ] in the majority rule tree is supported by homoplasy, not produced gonocoxite, shared with majority of known fossils from Baltic amber.
Clade C presents the same topology in both trees, with species grouped in genera as recently recognized. Aurolabis labis and Eolabis artis share two homoplasies, i.e., reduction of crossvein m-m and absence of separate vein M 2, the latter present also in Eolabis ambustus . Clade grouping species of the genus Idiolabis , i.e., [ Idiolabis terebrella + [ Idiolabis christelae + Idiolabis ryszardi ]] is present insingle synapomorphy, strong elongation of male genitalia, and two symplesiomorphies, thorax not enlarged and tergite IX and gonostylus without additional complications in structure. A single synapomorphy, gonostylus with basal lobe short, hardly reaching 1/3 of the gonostylus length supports [ Idiolabis christelae + Idiolabis ryszardi ]. The clade grouping majority of Eolabis species, i.e., [ Eolabis latusta + [ Eolabis ambustus + Eolabis vetusta + Eolabis vyshniauskasi ]] is not supported by synapomorphy, but with two homoplasies. [ Eolabis ambustus + Eolabis vetusta + Eolabis vyshniauskasi ] is supported by homoplastic feature, tip of A 2 at the level of Rs base, shared with Limnophila pictipennis and Dactylolabis amberifis . The last clade, comprising species of the genus Eobothrophorus is supported by single synapomorphy, enlarged and compressed male genitalia, and homoplasy, IXth tergum with median lobe. Relationships within this clade remain unsolved.
PAS |
Java Sugar Experimental Station |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.