Gynura lyrata

Zhu, Li-Cui, Hariri, Muhammad Rifqi, Li, Cheng-Sheng & Ren, Chen, 2025, Clarification of the taxonomic and nomenclatural confusions with three Gynura names (Asteraceae: Senecioneae) based on Zollinger’s collections from Java, Indonesia, Phytotaxa 697 (3), pp. 219-233 : 227

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.697.3.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E98786-FFB1-241C-FF64-FE38FC32311B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Gynura lyrata
status

 

Gynura lyrata View in CoL

The problem of Gynura lyrata is generally straightforward after we resolved the confusion on G. mollis and G. densiflora . The species was described simultaneously with G. mollis by Schultz in Zollinger’s (1854: 124, 127) Catalogue, based on a specimen of a mixed gathering of Zollinger HZ.442. Miquel (1856) treated G. mollis as a dubious name and speculated that it might be conspecific with G. aurantiaca . Koorders (1912) formally synonymized it with G. aurantiaca , and this treatment has been followed by all later researchers ( Hochreutiner 1934; Davies 1980; Vanijajiva & Kadereit 2011) except Backer (1940), who synonymized it with G. pseudochina (L.) DC. but with some doubts. Significantly, the type of G. mollis appears to have never been located ( Miquel 1856; Backer 1940; Davies 1980; Vanijajiva & Kadereit 2011).

We have been able to sorted out six specimens of Zollinger HZ.442, viz., BR0000029078073 ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ), P02562892 ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ), P02562893 ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ), P02562894 ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ), P02562896 ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ), and P02562909 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Among these, P02562892 ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ), P02562893 ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ), and P02562909 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ), which are further numbered as H.2592, have been discussed above. They are from Schultz’s herbarium but not the type material of Gynura lyrata . Instead, P02562892 ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ) and P02562893 ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ) are the syntypes of G. mollis . P02562909 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) was likely distributed only after Zollinger received Schultz’s determination on G. mollis , and probably not used for describing G. lyrata either, because the two species were published simultaneously. Moreover, P02562909 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) is in conflict with the original description of G. lyrata , with elliptic and undivided rather than lyrate leaves as described by Schultz (in Zollinger 1854) for G. lyrata .

The other two specimens, BR0000029078073 ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) and P02562894 ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ), are not from the Schultz Herbarium and probably not seen by Schultz. In fact, they represent the additional cases of cross-labelling between HZ.442 and H.2592. Both specimens are G. mollis and should belong to H.2592 but are mislabeled as HZ.442.

The remaining specimen, P02562896 ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ), matches the protologue of G. mollis perfectly. It is from Schultz’s herbarium (annotated with “Herb. Schultz Bip.” and “HERB. E. COSSON”; see above) and bears the determination of “ Gynura lyrata ” in Schultz’s hand ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ). This specimen should be the holotype of G. lyrata . Morphologically, it well conforms with G. auriculata and is accepted as a synonym of the latter.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Asterales

Family

Asteraceae

Genus

Gynura

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF