Krikkenjanius Rodrigues, Grossi, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2025.2472439 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17005997 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E06914-A645-FFC8-1F69-FAC91B5F4082 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Krikkenjanius Rodrigues, Grossi |
| status |
|
Genus Krikkenjanius Rodrigues, Grossi View in CoL and Vaz-de-Mello gen. n.
http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
( Figures 1 View Figure 1 (G), 21, 22)
Type species
Genuchinus brasiliensis Moser, 1910 View in CoL , by monotypy.
Diagnosis
Krikkenjanius gen. n. is recognised by the following combination of characters: Clypeal projection is weakly bent upwards and arched ( Figure 21 View Figure 21 (B)), with a line delimiting the clypeolateral declivity. The pronotum has wide, rounded sides centrally, with a posterolateral emargination, making the posterior portion narrower ( Figures 1 View Figure 1 (G), 21 (C)). Its surface is irregular, ocellate-punctate, with setae in the centre of the punctures. The punctation is dense ocellate-punctate along the middle and near the margin, where the setae are more visible. Protibia has five teeth: one apical-lateral (enlarged with a lateral sulcus), two reduced apical-ventral (one near the apical spur), and two lateral-proximal ( Figure 21 View Figure 21 (D)).
Description
Same as for the species, since it is monospecific.
Etymology
The name of the genus is a tribute of the memory of Jan Krikken, a great name in studying Cetoniinae around the world, and a special contributor to the knowledge of Neotropical Cremastocheilini , being a masculine noun in the nominative case.
Remarks
The generic classification of the species Genuchinus brasiliensis has been questioned by both Moser (1910) and by Krikken (1981) due to its unique characteristics. In both works, they even considered establishing a new genus for this species. In our review of the Cremastocheilini of South America, we observed ambiguity in some characters, which could support either retaining Krikkenjanius brasiliensis in Cyclidinus or transferring it to Cyclidiellus . However, due to unique characters observed (see the diagnosis of Krikkenjanius gen. n.) and to avoid unnecessary re-diagnosis of other well-established genera, we propose the description of a new genus here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
