Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758

Iftime, Alexandru & Oţel, Vasile, 2025, An annotated systematical checklist of the Romanian ichthyofauna, Zootaxa 5654 (1), pp. 1-64 : 10

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5654.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA3C943C-34B5-4574-B229-A33D37337B3C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15822600

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE5C3A-0C37-CC6F-71D8-D34A7A9616E6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758
status

 

Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL View at ENA

A native, widespread freshwater species of the lowland and lower hills, living in slow-flowing or stagnant water; abundantly supplemented by cultivated stocks ( Bănărescu 1964; Manea 1985; Oțel 2007; Cocan & MireȘan 2018; Polyák et al. 2022; Nagy et al. 2023; Năstase & Năvodaru 2023).

The koi, an ornamental breed selected in Japan, is worth mentioning as it is thought to originate from the Asian species Cyprinus rubrofuscus Lacépède, 1803 ( Kottelat & Freyhof 2007). There are no precise data upon the introduction time, origin and distribution of koi in Romania; it is found in ornamental urban waterbodies (e.g. in Bucharest —A. Iftime obs.) as well as in some fishponds. While C. rubrofuscus is widely accepted as distinct from C. carpio ( Kottelat & Freyhof 2007; Fricke et al. 2025; Froese & Pauly 2025), it seems to be very close to C. carpio ; various aspects, including the overall genetic structure of C. carpio s. l.; ( Xu et al. 2014; Tsipas et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2023, Nielsen et al. 2010; Kuts et al. 2021) and the mix-up of domesticated koi, at least some strains thereof being admixed with European carps ( de Kock & Gomelsky 2015), suggest its status as a valid species should be revised (as suggested by Zhu et al. 2023).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Order

Cypriniformes

Family

Cyprinidae

Genus

Cyprinus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF