Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5654.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA3C943C-34B5-4574-B229-A33D37337B3C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15822600 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE5C3A-0C37-CC6F-71D8-D34A7A9616E6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 |
status |
|
Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL View at ENA
A native, widespread freshwater species of the lowland and lower hills, living in slow-flowing or stagnant water; abundantly supplemented by cultivated stocks ( Bănărescu 1964; Manea 1985; Oțel 2007; Cocan & MireȘan 2018; Polyák et al. 2022; Nagy et al. 2023; Năstase & Năvodaru 2023).
The koi, an ornamental breed selected in Japan, is worth mentioning as it is thought to originate from the Asian species Cyprinus rubrofuscus Lacépède, 1803 ( Kottelat & Freyhof 2007). There are no precise data upon the introduction time, origin and distribution of koi in Romania; it is found in ornamental urban waterbodies (e.g. in Bucharest —A. Iftime obs.) as well as in some fishponds. While C. rubrofuscus is widely accepted as distinct from C. carpio ( Kottelat & Freyhof 2007; Fricke et al. 2025; Froese & Pauly 2025), it seems to be very close to C. carpio ; various aspects, including the overall genetic structure of C. carpio s. l.; ( Xu et al. 2014; Tsipas et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2023, Nielsen et al. 2010; Kuts et al. 2021) and the mix-up of domesticated koi, at least some strains thereof being admixed with European carps ( de Kock & Gomelsky 2015), suggest its status as a valid species should be revised (as suggested by Zhu et al. 2023).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.