Perisama lebasii ambatensis Oberthür, 1916 (Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz, 2025)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5636.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36BFC931-0E52-4738-80BE-CA94FB99D3AF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD1131-2A45-2A09-2AF7-D4D9FC6EFCD9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Perisama lebasii ambatensis Oberthür, 1916 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Perisama lebasii ambatensis Oberthür, 1916 stat. rev.
Perisama ambatensis was originally described by Oberthür (1916) as a species, but was reduced to the rank of a subspecies of Perisama lebasii (Guérin-Ménéville, [1844]) View in CoL by Lamas (2004), then its specific status was reinstated by Attal and Crosson-du-Cormier (2010). It can be distinguished from P. lebasii lebasii View in CoL by the absence of a spearhead shaped protuberance in the extension of the green FWD cubital ray. Perisama hilara Salvin, 1869 View in CoL was also described as a species. It was regarded as a subspecies of P. lebasii View in CoL by Lamas (2004), and its specific status was reinstated, again, by Attal & Crosson-du-Cormier (2010). Its most prominent distinguishable character is the presence of generally small greyish-blue dots on the HWD ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). This taxon can be easily confused with P. ambatensis . The comparison of large series of specimens allows to notice that the HWV internal, median line is more sinuous in P. hilara View in CoL than in P. ambatensis , but individual variation is relatively important which sometimes makes their taxonomic identification difficult. P. hilara View in CoL is relatively uncommon and reported from southern Peru and northern Bolivia. Our phylogenetic analysis shows that P. hilara View in CoL , P. ambatensis and P. lebasii View in CoL form a common clade, and their relative genetic distances do not exceed 1.5%. Since there are no significant differences in male genitalia morphology ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) and there is no evidence of their sympatry, P. hilara View in CoL and P. ambatensis are formally considered here, as proposed by Lamas (2004), as subspecies of P. lebasii View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Perisama lebasii ambatensis Oberthür, 1916
Zubek, Anna, Wahlberg, Niklas, Boyer, Pierre, Lorenc-Brudecka, Jadwiga, Mahecha-J, Oscar & Pyrcz, Tomasz 2025 |
Perisama ambatensis
Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz 2025 |
P. ambatensis
Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz 2025 |
P. ambatensis
Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz 2025 |
P. ambatensis
Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz 2025 |
P. ambatensis
Zubek & Wahlberg & Boyer & Lorenc-Brudecka & Mahecha-J & Pyrcz 2025 |
Perisama hilara
Salvin 1869 |
P. hilara
Salvin 1869 |
P. hilara
Salvin 1869 |
P. hilara
Salvin 1869 |
P. hilara
Salvin 1869 |