Eucyclops prionophorus Kiefer, 1931
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v42.e24023 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F82BF7E-AADF-4359-A5CE-2ECD91FC99D4 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16969973 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D987B5-8862-7D05-FEFC-FA6AFE86FBF1 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Eucyclops prionophorus Kiefer, 1931 |
| status |
|
Eucyclops prionophorus Kiefer, 1931 View in CoL
Figs 12 View Figure 12 , 13 View Figure 13
Diagnosis. Adult female, 870 µm in length excluding caudal setae. Simple duct projections in the genital double-somite, not divided by an internal integumental scar as in Eucyclops (Denticyclops) leptacanthus ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ). Hyaline membrane on the last antennule segment with a finely serrulate pattern ( Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ). Caudal ramus 4.6 times longer than wide, outer ornamentation (spinules) without gradual change in size ( Figs 12B View Figure 12 , 13B, C View Figure 13 ). Inner terminal spine of the last segment of of P4 endopod 1.3 times longer than the segment ( Fig. 12C, D View Figure 12 ).
Remarks. Species with a wide geographic distribution in the Americas. It is often found in coastal regions, among aquatic macrophytes and in rivers, and it is seldom found in the plankton of reservoirs. Animals with a dark (black or brownish) color, usually with debris attached to the appendages and body surface due to their benthic habit. This species can be distinguished from congeners by the spinules along the entire outer margin of the caudal rami, and by its proportional width and length.
C
D
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
