Manayunkia speciosa Leidy, 1859
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5661.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1BF79176-D4A7-4927-B0F1-459DC34C0F9D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D88798-1840-FFEC-51B6-FA4A5C7CFD08 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Manayunkia speciosa Leidy, 1859 |
status |
|
Manayunkia speciosa Leidy, 1859 View in CoL
( Figures 1 View FIGURE 1 and 21 View FIGURE 21 )
Manayunkia speciosa Leidy, 1859: 90 View in CoL . – Leidy 1883: 204–212, pl. 9, fig. 1–13. – Potts 1884: 21–22. – Foulke 1884: 303–304.
– Zenkevitsch 1925: 36–38. – Meehan 1929: 479–480. – Pettibone 1953: 149–153, fig. 1. – Hiltunen 1965: 183–185.
– Wilson 1965: 175–176. – Schloesser et al. 2016: 1072–1082, fig. 2–9. Manayunkia eriensis, Krecker 1939: 153–154 .? Manayunkia speciosa . – Holmquist 1967: 297–302, fig. 1. 1973: 497–507, fig. 1–5. Not: Manayunkia speciosa . – Armendáriz et al. 2011: 282–283. – Armendáriz et al. 2012: 81–84, fig. 4,5. – Hazel 1966: 533–
535, fig. 1. – Paola et al. 2013: 523–527, fig. 2,3. – Verner 1981: 182–183. – Wilson et al. 2010: 183–191, fig. 2.
Material examined. USA, North Carolina, Lake Norman, 35°26’N, 80°56’W, coll. 6. or 7.10.1981, 7 specimens ( USNM 68726 About USNM ); Western Lake Erie , coll. GoogleMaps 1963, 137 specimens ( USNM 31015 About USNM ) .
Description (based on the descriptions of Leidy (1883), Potts (1884), Pettibone (1953), Atkinson et al. (2020) and own observations). Total length of specimens about 2.5–4.9 mm, width about 0.25–0.3 mm; length of radiolar crown about 0.4–0.8 mm; ratio between length of radiolar crown and body length, without radiolar crown, about 0.2–0.3. Body cylindrical, posteriorly rounded ( Figs 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 21A–C View FIGURE 21 ).
Radiolar crown with three pairs of radioles and one pair of unbranched vascularized ventral filamentous appendages; dorsal radioles unbranched, median and ventral radioles with a maximum of 10 branches each in adults but lower in juveniles; vascularized ventral filamentous appendages slightly wider and longer than radioles ( Figs 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 21A, B View FIGURE 21 ).
Metanephridium in peristomium and chaetigers 1–2 ( Fig. 1.1 View FIGURE 1 ). Peristomium about as long as wide, with anterior and posterior rings; anterior ring distinctly shorter than posterior ring; anterior margin of anterior peristomial ring developed as low membranous collar ventrally, narrowly separated mid-dorsally; border between anterior and posterior peristomial rings indistinct; with one pair of black rounded peristomial eyes ( Figs 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 21A, B View FIGURE 21 ).
Chaetigers 1 to 5 almost same length or successively longer, chaetigers 6 and 7 longest, chaetiger 8 shorter again; first 5 thoracic chaetigers wider than long, last 3 thoracic chaetigers distinctly longer than wide; abdomen, including pygidium, as long as chaetiger 8, often separated from thorax by a widening at chaetiger 9 ( Fig. 21A, C View FIGURE 21 ); chaetigers 9 to 11 successively shorter; borders between thoracic chaetigers usually visible and between abdominal chaetigers indistinct; pygidium as long as chaetiger 10 ( Figs 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 20A, C View FIGURE 20 ).
Thoracic notopodia with about 4–6 elongate, and about 2–4 short, narrowly hooded chaetae, length of chaetae 100–250 µm ( Figs 1.3, 1.4 View FIGURE 1 , 21D–G View FIGURE 21 ); thoracic neuropodia of males with 2–4 (sometimes 5) uncini, neuropodia of females with same uncini on chaetigers 2–5, followed by transitional chaetae on chaetigers 6–8; thoracic uncini about 50–60 µm long, with main fang and apical with about 5–6 rows of progressively smaller teeth ( Figs 1.5 View FIGURE 1 , 21I View FIGURE 21 ); abdominal neuropodia with elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, decreasing posteriorly from 5–7 to 2–4 per fascicle ( Fig. 21H View FIGURE 21 ); abdominal notopodia with about 20–24 (max. 30) uncini on chaetiger 9, 16–18 on chaetiger 10, and 12–14 on chaetiger 11; abdominal uncini about 20–30 µm long, with about 5–7 rows of equal-sized teeth, and about 4–6 teeth per row ( Figs 1.6, 1.7 View FIGURE 1 , 21J View FIGURE 21 ).
Pygidium short and rounded ( Figs 1.1 View FIGURE 1 , 21A, C View FIGURE 21 ).
Body wall translucent olive-green, radioles with minor brown pigmentation; base of radioles with 6–10 brownish pigment spots ( Fig. 1.1 View FIGURE 1 ); spots not visible when preserved.
Remarks. Manayunkia speciosa most closely resembles M. occidentalis . For the differences between these two species, see the Remarks in M. occidentalis . Females and males differ in the presence or absence of transitional chaetae on segments 6–8, as already described by Atkinson et al. (2020).
Leidy (1883) described and illustrated the occurrence of an expansion at the beginning of chaetiger 6 ( Fig. 1.1 View FIGURE 1 ), which he interpreted as the possible beginning of paratomy (transverse division with head formation). Zenkevitsch (1925) already referred to this structure and its possible function as a brood chamber in this species when he described a brood chamber in M. baicalensis ( Nusbaum, 1901) .
Pettibone (1953) also described a thickened semicircular band on the ventral side of the anterior part of chaetiger 6, and mentioned Zenkevitsch's (1925) assumption that it could be part of a brood chamber. Holmquist (1973), on the other hand, found no evidence of a brood chamber in specimens from Alaska. In the material available to us from North Carolina (from October) and from Western Lake Erie (without any exact date of collection) we also did not find any indication of a brood chamber in females.
The occurrence of Manayunkia speciosa has been documented from several regions of North America. However, it has been shown that the specimens found in the north-west of the United States, far from the type locality in the eastern part of the USA, belong to a different species. This species has been described as M. occidentalis (see Remarks in M. occidentalis ). It would also be interesting to know whether the individuals from the southern states of the USA, e.g. North Carolina, really belong to M. speciosa and whether there is a genetic difference between these specimens and those from the north-east of the USA. It can be also assumed that the specimens found in freshwater lakes of northern Alaska, which were recorded by Holmquist (1967, 1973) and labelled as M. speciosa , must be assigned to another, undescribed species.
Geographic distribution. Northeastern United States: Pennsylvania, New Jersey, North Carolina , Great Lakes, northern Alaska (?).
Biology. Abundances of more than 45,000 specimens per square meter have been reported for M. speciosa in the mouth of the Detroit River, western Lake Erie ( Hiltunen 1965). Males have sperm and spermatids in chaetigers 6–8. Eggs develop in females in chaetiger 4. The oviduct opens between the 4th and 5th chaetiger. Eggs are oval, and have a length of 0.135 mm and a width of 0.095 mm ( Meehean 1929). The eggs are laid in the tube, where they develop into young worms that leave the tube with 8 to 9 chaetigers ( Fig. 1.8–1.13 View FIGURE 1 ). The reproduction of this species was described by Schloesser et al. (2016). According to these authors, mature specimens were found from April to October. The sex ratio was approximately 1:1 on average, but with a higher proportion of males (72%) in April and a higher proportion of females in October (80%). This means that males become sexually mature earlier than females, and females remain mature longer than males. Reproduction is continuous from May to September, but a first peak recruitment occurs between late June and mid-July and second peak in early September. But in October, females with eggs and males with sperm were still found in North Carolina (own observation). The mean number of larvae found in the tubes of females is approximately 5, and the maximum number is 20. Schloesser et al. (2016) assumed a minimum life span of approximately 10 months for this species.
Mechanical disturbances or lack of oxygen result in an exit from their tubes or deep withdrawal. When they left their tubes, they often took with juveniles as well. Schloesser et al. (2016) concluded from their observations from western Lake Erie that a large proportion of individuals occur outside of their tubes most of the time during warmer months and that their tubes are not maintained in colder months.
Manayunkia speciosa was long confused with M. occidentalis . However, only M. occidentalis is an obligate intermediate host for myxozoan parasites, but not M. speciosa , which has long been incorrectly described as an intermediate host (see Remarks on biology of M. occidentalis ).
Ecology. Tubes composed of mud or fine particles, attached partly along their length to fixed objects but the greater part free, pendant. According to Leidy (1883), most of the tubes of M. speciosa occur as single tubes, but two to five tubes connected together have been found in some cases ( Fig. 1.2 View FIGURE 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Manayunkia speciosa Leidy, 1859
Bick, Andreas & Bastrop, Ralf 2025 |
Manayunkia speciosa
Potts, E. 1884: 21 |
Foulke, S. G. 1884: 303 |
Leidy, J. 1883: 204 |
Leidy, J. 1859: 90 |