Grammomys Thomas, 1915
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2025v47a27 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF6A7887-54B4-466B-B2CB-BB0BE3B98338 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17465926 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087E9-9F7C-4736-0C97-F910FC8685FB |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Grammomys Thomas, 1915 |
| status |
|
Genus Grammomys Thomas, 1915 View in CoL
( Tables 7 View TABLE ; 8 View TABLE )
REMARKS
Grammomys remained confounded with Thamnomys for a long time, but recently, molecular analyses have confirmed the validity of these two genera ( Bryja et al. 2017, 2024; Mikula et al. 2021). In West Africa, only one clade was recognized, Grammomys buntingi Thomas, 1911 ( holotype NHM-11.7.28.27 from Bassa, Liberia). Heim de Balsac & Lamotte (1958) recorded the presence of Grammomys ( macmillani ?) buntingi in Guinean side of the Mount Nimba. The genus was not collected by Coe (1975), Gautun et al. (1986) or Misonne & Verschuren (1976). The new specimens collected during our expeditions in Liberia have been sequenced and are all attributed to G. buntingi ( Bryja et al. 2017) . A recent revision using phylogenomic analyses however, put G. buntingi in synonymy within the G. macmillani clade ( Bryja et al. 2024)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
