Spintherophyta minuta (Jacoby, 1881)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-022-00987-2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15579252 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF879C-1008-5640-FC8D-5BD5B13DC663 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spintherophyta minuta (Jacoby, 1881) |
status |
|
Spintherophyta minuta (Jacoby, 1881)
( Figs. 1f View Fig , 3e View Fig , 5j View Fig )
New species record: JGZC: (1) female ( JGZC-2612 ), Rivas, Cárdenas, Finca Isla Vista , 11.23345 -85.55123, 56 m, 6 February 2012, A. Cardoso, G. De la Cadena, J.-M. Maes & A. Papadopoulou leg., Spintherophyta minuta (Jac.) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2022; GoogleMaps (2) female ( JGZC-2626 ), Rivas, Cárdenas, Finca Sierra Serena , 11.23527 -85.55388, 69 m, 7 February 2012, A. Cardoso, G. De la Cadena, J.-M. Maes & A. Papadopoulou leg., Spintherophyta minuta (Jac.) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2022; GoogleMaps (3) female ( JGZC-1308 ) GoogleMaps and males ( JGZC-1298 , JGZC-1310 ), Rivas, Sapoa, Finca Guadalupe , 11.179983 -85.6807925, 290 m, 15 September 2009, J.-M. Maes leg., Spintherophyta minuta (Jac.) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2022; GoogleMaps (4) female ( JGZC-2631 ), Rivas, Sapoa, Finca Guadalupe , 11.18847 -85.67619, 157 m, 9 February 2012, A. Cardoso, G. De la Cadena, J.-M. Maes & A. Papadopoulou leg., Spintherophyta minuta (Jac.) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2022. GoogleMaps
Jacoby (1881, p. 110) described Chrysodina minuta from Guatemala, not to be confounded with Lamprosphaerus minutus described from the same country (p. 113), the latter having been already reported from Nicaragua ( Maes and Staines 1991). Relative to the former, the author expressed doubts about its correct generic placement, mainly because of its relatively elongate shape and long prosternum, which did not fit his concept of Chrysodina (Jacoby 1890) . Lefèvre (1889a) transferred Jacoby’s taxon to Lamprosphaerus without justification, but Jacoby (1890) was not satisfied with this decision, highlighting that the enlarged apical antennomeres of his species were not characteristic of Lamprosphaerus . Bechyné (1953) proposed a new combination with Nodonota , and years later to Antitypona , but without any justification ( Bechyné 1955). Flowers (1996) treated most Chrysodina described by Jacoby as Spintherophyta , including C. minuta . The specimens collected in Nicaragua ( Fig. 1f View Fig ) agree well with the type of C. minuta , also in the shape of their antennae, with short antennomeres 3 and 4 and a markedly enlarged second antennomere, characteristic of Central American Spintherophyta ; they also show clear microreticulation on head and pronotum, even though the dorsal tinge is of a stronger green and blue hue compared with the type. Thus, we tend to agree with Flowers’ (1996) assessment for this species and retain it in Spintherophyta , and take the opportunity to illustrate the penis ( Fig. 3e View Fig ) and spermatheca ( Fig. 5j View Fig ) of this species for the first time. S. minuta is only known from Guatemala, and the Nicaraguan records, all found in the south of the country, represent a remarkable expansion of the known range of the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Eumolpinae |
Genus |