Harpactea bozdaglarensis Kunt, Danışman and Yağmur, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2024.2438318 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14798115 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF831E-FFEA-F164-FEBA-0D21FCD8FBA3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Harpactea bozdaglarensis Kunt, Danışman and Yağmur |
status |
sp. nov. |
Harpactea bozdaglarensis Kunt, Danışman and Yağmur sp. n.
( Figures 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 4A–C View Figure 4 )
Material examined
Holotype. ♂ ( KUAM), TURKEY: Manisa Province, Salihli District, 2 km south of Allahdiyen Village (38.427222°N, 28.089167°W), c. 800 m asl, 14 May-2 July 2012, pitfall traps, Leg. E.A. Yağmur GoogleMaps . Paratypes 1 ♂ ( KUAM), TURKEY: Manisa Province, Salihli District, 10 km north of Bozdağ Village (38.416667°N, 28.084167°W), c. 922 m asl, 05 April-5 May 2015, MSS trap, Leg. E.A. Yağmur GoogleMaps – 1 ♂ ( HZH), Manisa Province, Turgutlu District, Kuşlar (Dağmarmara) Village (38.353056°N, 27.839167°W), c. 962 m asl, 10 May-26 June 2016, pitfall traps, Leg. E. A. Yağmur – Same place but 1 ♂ ( AZMM ) GoogleMaps , 1 ♀ ( AZMM) GoogleMaps , 1 ♀ ( KUAM) 26 November 2017 - 2 March 2018, pitfall traps, Leg. E.A. Yağmur .
Etymology
The specific epithet is a toponym for the ‘ Bozdağlar’, a mountain range located in the provinces of İzmir and Manisa in Turkey, including the type locality of the new species.
Diagnosis
The male copulatory organ of H. bozdaglarensis sp. n. shows affinity with H. alexandrae Lazarov, 2006 , whose type locality is Bulgaria. However, in H. alexandrae , the embolus (E) is longer than the conductor (C) (see Lazarov 2006, figs. 2, 3). Also, the angle between the embolus and the conductor is much narrower in H. bozdaglarensis sp. n. than in H. alexandrae ( Figures 2B–C View Figure 2 , 4A–C View Figure 4 ). The vulva of the females of these two species is entirely different. Whereas in H. bozdaglarensis sp. n., the distal end of the spermatheca (S) is concave or straight, the middle is bulging, in H. alexandrae , the spermatheca is almost straight, and the tip is narrow and convex (see Figure 2A–D View Figure 2 ; Spiegelaere and Bosmans 2009, fig. 2).
Another species resembling H. bozdaglarensis sp. n. is H. clementi Bosmans, 2009 . However, while the tegulum is cylindrical in H. bozdaglarensis sp. n., it is pear-shaped in H. clementi . In addition, the embolus, which is cylindrical in H. clementi , is flattened in H. bozdaglarensis sp. n. When the females of these two species are compared, it is characteristic that the anchor-like chitinous parts of the vulva of H. bozdaglarensis sp. n. are wider than those of H. clementi and that the vulva of the new species has a distinct sclerotised belt (see Figures 1B–C View Figure 1 and 2A–D View Figure 2 ; Keer and Bosmans 2009, figs. 1–6).
Description
Measurements. [Holotype ♂ / Paratypes ♀] TL 5.60/5.70–6.65; AL 2.91/3.10–3.55; CL 2.69/2.60–3.10; CWmax 2.02/2.05–2.40; CWmin 0.87/0.90–1.05; Clh 0.08/0.06–0.07; Aed 0.12/0.11–0.11; iAE 0.08/0.06–0.08; PLEd 0.11/0.10–0.12; PMEd 0.10/0.08–0.10; ChF 0.61/0.53–0.54; ChG 0.31/0.23–0.25; ChL 1.24/1.00–1.25.
[Paratype ♂] TL 5.58; AL 2.94; CL 2.64; CWmax 1.92; CWmin 0.77; Clh 0.06; Aed 0.12; iAE 0.09; PLEd 0.12; PMEd 0.11; ChF 0.61; ChG 0.32; ChL 1.16.
Middle-sized harpacteine spider. Carapace reddish brown with smooth surface. Eye region and margins of thoracic region darker than general. Fovea longitudinal, blackish, distinct. Surface of carapace with sparse yellowish short setae. Setae around eyes relatively long compared to others. Anterior margin of eye region convex, while posterior margin of thoracic region straight. Eyes silver-coloured, arranged annularly. AE>PLE>PME. AE seperated; AE-PLE 0.01, PLE-PME 0.03, PME-PME 0.02.
Sternum glabrous, orangish-red; length 1.54, width 1.19. Surface with brownish hairs. Labium and gnathocoxae reddish. Labium length 0.39, width 0.30. Gnathocoxae length 0.69, width 0.55. Chelicerae reddish brown. Cheliceral groove with four triangular teeth ( Figure 1A View Figure 1 ). Promarginal teeth more strongly developed than retromarginal teeth. Promarginal teeth almost same size. Of retromarginal teeth, one in centre of cheliceral groove about twice size of one at base. There is a distance of 0.02 between the promarginal and 0.08 between the retromarginal teeth.
Abdomen greyish. Surface covered with brownish setae. Legs yellowish light brown. Anterior legs slightly darker than posterior legs. Tarsi with three claws. Paired claws toothed. Paired claws of legs I and II with 7 teeth; legs III and IV with 5 teeth. Anterior legs without scopulae. Tarsi three and four and first distal quarter of metatarsi three and four with scopulae. Anterior femora and third and fourth coxae with spine. Leg formula: VI, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements are given in Tables 1 View Table 1 and 2 View Table 2 , respectively.
Palp. ( Figures 1B–D View Figure 1 , 4A–C View Figure 4 ). Palpal tarsus cylindrical, length 0.63. Palpal tibia longer than tarsus ( Figure 1B View Figure 1 ), length 0.65. Ratio Ti/Ta 0.97. Tegulum (T) cylindrical, brownish; length 0.55, width 0.31. Embolus (E) strongly sclerotised in the proximal half and weakly sclerotised in distal half, with a membranous appearance ( Figures 1C View Figure 1 , 4A View Figure 4 ). Conductor (C) massive, strongly sclerotised. Embolus and conductor almost same size ( Figures 1D View Figure 1 , 4C View Figure 4 ). Embolus length 0.27, conductor 0.28. Embolus originated from distal centre of tegulum, whereas conductor originated from distal prolateral margin. Embolus flattens and narrows towards tip ( Figures 1C View Figure 1 , 4A–C View Figure 4 ). Conductor cylindrical, spiniform with a sharply tapering end. As it distances from distal part of tegulum, tips of embolus and conductor become more distant from each other ( Figures 1D View Figure 1 , 4C View Figure 4 ).
Although there are size differences between the somatic parts of males and females, they are generally similar. Palpal tarsus cylindrical, length 0.75–0.90. Palpal tibia shorter than tarsus, length 0.60–0.65.
Vulva. ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ). Anterior arc (AC) wider than long. Spermathecal keel (SK) concave in some individuals and relatively straight in others. In all cases, lateral edges pointed ( Figure 4A–D View Figure 4 ). Approximate middle part of spermatheca (S) slightly recurved to sides ( Figure 4A–D View Figure 4 ). Anterior part of this region longer than part posterior to it. In addition, posterior part sclerotised at same level as anterior margin of the anterior arc (AA) and more strongly sclerotised than anterior part.
Lateral margins of anterior margin of the anterior arc are widened laterally ( Figure 4B View Figure 4 ). These parts more weakly sclerotised than central regions. Round structures (RS) are symmetrical and distinct as conical tubercles ( Figure 4A–B View Figure 4 ). Width of transversal bar (TB) approximately equal to anterior margin of the anterior arc ( Figure 4C View Figure 4 ). Posterior diverticulum membranous, with indistinct borders, attached to the transversal bar ( Figure 4C View Figure 4 ). Between anterior margin of the anterior arc and transversal bar there is a sclerotised belt whose width is approximately twice that of anterior margin of anterior arc ( Figure 4A–C View Figure 4 ).
Distribution
Known only from type localities.
Habitat
The collection site, situated 2 km south of Allahdiyen Village, comprises dense oak bushes and scattered red pine trees. This habitat features a thick layer of leaf litter and is a serene and humid area located on the outskirts of a large valley. The MSS traps were positioned among accumulated, fragmented stone pieces in a small, cool, and humid valley. The area also encompasses plane trees and accumulated stones blanketed with leaf litter composed of dried plane leaves. Mixed red pine trees and oak bushes distinguish the Kuşlar site. It is a cool and humid environment with dense leaf litter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Harpacteinae |
Genus |