Scotinotylus guizhouensis Irfan, Zhang & Peng
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.15.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14990712 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD8788-8DA6-FF6B-4973-CCB2AF22FA5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scotinotylus guizhouensis Irfan, Zhang & Peng |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scotinotylus guizhouensis Irfan, Zhang & Peng , sp. n.
(áhȁ头e)
Figures 208–211 View FIGURE 208 View FIGURE 209 View FIGURE 210 View FIGURE 211 , 307 View FIGURE 307 , 310 View FIGURE 310
Types. Holotype ♂ ( HNU–GZ– IV–1715 ), CHINA, Guizhou Prov.: Tongren City, Songtao Co., Wuluo Town , Taohuayuan Vill ., Fanjingshan NNR , 28.00130°N, 108.80578°E, 1160 m, 06.XI.2017, G.C. Zhou leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 11♂ 17♀, with same data as for holotype male ( HNU–GZ– IV–1715 ); GoogleMaps Chongqing: 2♀, Pengshui Co., Mowei MSS , 29.16079°N, 108.03732°E, 1564 m, 26.VII.2017, M. Irfan & G.C. Zhou leg. ( HNU–CQ– IV–1723 ); GoogleMaps 1♀, Pengshui Co., Mowei MSS , 29.19612°N, 108.04788°E, 1458 m, 26.VII.2017, M. Irfan & G.C. Zhou leg. ( HNU–CQ– IV–1724 ). GoogleMaps
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the type locality; adjective.
Diagnosis. Scotinotylus guizhouensis sp. n. resembles S. longiprojectus sp. n. and S. vettonicus in having the similar tegulum and the embolic division ( Figs 208A– D View FIGURE 208 , 209A–C View FIGURE 209 ; Figs 212A–D View FIGURE 212 , 213A–E View FIGURE 213 ; Barrientos et al. 2020, figs 2e–g, 3a–b), but can be distinguished by the paracymbium J-shaped in S. guizhouensis sp. n. ( Figs 208A–D View FIGURE 208 , 209A–C View FIGURE 209 ), vs. basal part of the paracymbium with long projection, hook-shaped pointed end and almost reaches to the proximal end of the tibia in retrolateral view in S. longiprojectus sp. n. ( Figs 212A–D View FIGURE 212 , 213E View FIGURE 213 ), C-shaped in S. vettonicus ; the distal suprategular apophysis long, tongue-shaped, protruding above the embolic membrane in S. guizhouensis sp. n. ( Figs 208A, B View FIGURE 208 , 209A–C View FIGURE 209 ), vs. small, retained below the embolic membrane in S. longiprojectus sp. n. ( Figs 212A, B, C View FIGURE 212 , 213A–D View FIGURE 213 ), absent in S. vettonicus ; retrolateral tibial apophysis present in S. guizhouensis sp. n. ( Figs 208B, C View FIGURE 208 ), vs. absent in S. longiprojectus sp. n. ( Figs 212B, C View FIGURE 212 ). Female resembles those of S. majesticus and S. vettonicus in having the epigyne with long tongue-shaped scapoid on anterior margin ( Figs 210A–D View FIGURE 210 ; Millidge, 1981, figs 85, 87; Barrientos et al. 2020, figs 2c–d), and can be distinguished by the copulatory ducts forming large broad loop extending anteriorly and than turn back to spermathecae in S. guizhouensis sp. n. ( Figs 210C, D View FIGURE 210 ; vs. forming long broad loop posteriorly in S. majesticus ; not forming long loop in S. vettonicus ); spermathecae present posteriorly on epigynal plate in S. guizhouensis sp. n. ( Figs 210A, D View FIGURE 210 ; vs. present anteriorly both in S. majesticus and S. vettonicus ).
Description. Male (holotype, Figs 211A–C View FIGURE 211 ): Total length: 1.93. Carapace 0.89 long, 0.67 wide, brown, cephalic region strongly elevated, cephalic pits present behind PLEs, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.24 high. Chelicerae with five promarginal and six retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, yellowish brown with microsetae. Eyes: AER recurved, PME procurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.07, PME 0.07, PLE 0.05, AME–AME 0.01, PME–PME 0.06,AME–ALE, 0.03, PME–PLE 0.03,AME–PME 0.07, ALE–ALE 0.26, PLE–PLE 0.29, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 2.40 (0.74, 0.79, 0.48, 0.39), II 2.26 (0.71, 0.74, 0.47, 0.34), III 1.89 (0.56, 0.62, 0.41, 0.30), IV 2.38 (0.69, 0.83, 0.52, 0.34). Tibial spine formula: 2-2- 1-1. TmI 0.38 and TmIV absent. Opisthosoma 1.05 long, 0.71 wide, oval, grey, densely covered with fine spines.
Palp ( Figs 208A–D View FIGURE 208 , 209A–C View FIGURE 209 ): Femur unmodified, almost longer than patella and tibia. Patella one and half times longer than tibia, ventrally grooved. Tibia with one reterolateral and one dorsal trichobothria, retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) somewhat triangular; dorsal tibial apophysis (DTA) long, slightly curved, with pointed end in dorsal view; cymbium unmodified, broad at distal end; paracymbium (PC) sclerotized, J-shaped; tegulum (T) ventrally with finger like projection in ventral view; protegulum (PT) broad, membranous, with blunt tip protruding upward; distal suprategular apophysis (DSA) sclerotized, slightly curved, distal end membranous. Tailpiece (TP) of embolic division sclerotized, curved with blunt tip; embolic membrane (EM) running parallel with embolus. Embolus (E) long, sclerotized, coiled, almost forming a complete transverse circle.
Female (paratype, Figs 211D–F View FIGURE 211 ): Total length: 1.92. Carapace 0.85 long, 0.66 wide, brown, cephalic region slightly elevated, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.27 high. Chelicerae with five promarginal and six retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, yellow with microsetae. Eyes: AER recurved, PME procurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.07, PME 0.06, PLE 0.06, AME–AME 0.02, PME–PME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.02, PME–PLE 0.04, AME–PME 0.07, ALE–ALE 0.26, PLE–PLE 0.28, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 2.34 (0.73, 0.80, 0.46, 0.35), II 2.08 (0.64, 0.72, 0.38, 0.34), III 1.71 (0.53, 0.56, 0.34, 0.28), IV 2.29 (0.72, 0.80, 0.44, 0.33). Tibial spine formula: 2-2- 1-1. TmI 0.36 and TmIV absent. Opisthosoma 1.07 long, 0.77 wide, oval, grey, densely covered with fine spines.
Epigyne ( Figs 210A–D View FIGURE 210 ): Ventral plate (VP) rectangular in outline; copulatory opening (CO) present poseriorly at the junction of dorsal and ventral plates; copulatory ducts (CD) long, sinuous; dorsal plate (DP) partly visible in ventral view. Scapoid (SCD) originates mid-anteriorly, longer than wide, tongue shaped with blunt end. Spermathecae (S) present near the posterior laterally on dorsal plate. Fertilization ducts (FD) short extending mesally.
Distribution.Known from type localities (Chongqing and Guizhou Province, Figs 307 View FIGURE 307 , 310 View FIGURE 310 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |