Tapinocyba sulcata Irfan, Zhang & Peng
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.15.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14990623 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD8788-8D87-FF76-4AD1-CB52ACDBF9DF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tapinocyba sulcata Irfan, Zhang & Peng |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tapinocyba sulcata Irfan, Zhang & Peng , sp. n.
(ŧüƀ大e)
Figures 245–248 View FIGURE 245 View FIGURE 246 View FIGURE 247 View FIGURE 248 , 312 View FIGURE 312
Types. Holotype ♂ ( HNU–HN– IV–1759 ), CHINA, Hunan Prov.: Shaoyang City, Suining Co., Zhaishi Town , Tieshanlin Vill. , Huangshan NNR , 26.37646 °N, 110.10573°E, 1129 m, 26.X.2017, G.C. Zhou leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 1♂ 11♀, with same data as for holotype ( HNU–HN– IV–1759 ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “sulcatus, -a, um” meaning “grooved” and referring to the distal suprategular apophysis distal end grooved in male palp.
Diagnosis. The male of Tapinocyba sulcata sp. n. resembles those of T. praecox (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1873) in having the similar embolic division ( Figs 245A– D View FIGURE 245 ; Hormiga 2000, figs 27A–E, pl. 62A–E) and can be distinguished by the tibia with three apophyses (DTA, PTA and RTA) in T. sulcata sp. n. ( Fig. 240A, B, D View FIGURE 240 ; vs. tibia with one apophysis); anterior radical apophysis present in T. sulcata sp. n. ( Figs 245A, C View FIGURE 245 ; vs. absent); embolus half the length of dorsal tibial apophysis in T. sulcata sp. n. ( Figs 245D View FIGURE 245 ; vs. longer than dorsal tibial apophysis). The female of T. sulcata sp. n. resembles those of T. pingshanensis sp. n. in having the similar ventral and dorsal plate ( Figs 247A–D View FIGURE 247 ; Figs 243A–C View FIGURE 243 ), and can be distinguished by the copulatory duct V-shaped in T. sulcata sp. n. ( Fig. 247D View FIGURE 247 ), vs. comma-shaped in T. pingshanensis sp. n. ( Fig. 243C View FIGURE 243 ); spermathecae present dorsoventrally in T. sulcata sp. n. ( Fig. 247D View FIGURE 247 ), vs. present posterolaterally in T. pingshanensis sp. n. ( Fig. 243C View FIGURE 243 ).
Description. Male (holotype, Figs 248A, B View FIGURE 248 ): Total length: 1.73. Carapace 0.77 long, 0.63 wide, brown, cephalic region strongly elevated, with cephalic pits, fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.19 high. Chelicerae with four promarginal and five retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, dark brown with microsetae. Eyes: AER recurved, PER procurved, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.03, ALE 0.06, PME 0.05, PLE 0.06, AME–AME 0.01, PME–PME 0.03, AME–ALE, 0.03, PME–PLE 0.04, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–ALE 0.24, PLE–PLE 0.25, ALE– PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 2.34 (0.69, 0.78, 0.48, 0.39), II 2.17 (0.67, 0.69, 0.45, 0.36), III 1.84 (0.57, 0.59, 0.39, 0.29), IV 2.4 (0.72, 0.79, 0.52, 0.37). TmI 0.64 and TmIV 0.69. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-1-1. All the tibia dorsally with 2 to 3 trichobothria. Opisthosoma 0.96 long, 0.61 wide, oval, dorsal side grey, ventral side black.
Palp ( Figs 245A–D View FIGURE 245 , 246A–C View FIGURE 246 ): Femur unmodified, almost longer than both patella and tibia. Patella 2/3 length of tibia, ventrally grooved at proximal end. Tibia conic, with 1 retrolateral and 1 dorsal trichobothria, retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) somewhat triangular with blunt end, dorsal tibial apophysis (DTA) C-shaped, as long as tibia, distal end of retrodorsal margin of tibia sclerotized, with serrated margin and prolateral tibial apophysis (PTA) semicircular with blunt end; cymbium unmodified, oval in dorsal view; paracymbium (PC) J-shaped, distal arm hook-shaped; tegulum (T) almost round, protegulum (PT) distinctly developed, membranous; distal suprategular apophysis (DSA) longer than wide distally. Radix (R) longer than wide, anterior part sclerotized, moderately long, overlapping the suprategulum, posterior end strongly curved. Embolic membrane (EM) small, with serrated end. Embolus (E) sclerotized, stout, almost half the length of dorsal tibial apophysis, extending above the apex of cymbium.
Female (paratype, Figs 248C, D View FIGURE 248 ): Total length: 1.84. Carapace 0.78 long, 0.56 wide, brown, cephalic region slightly elevated, fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.22 high. Chelicerae with five promarginal and five retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, dark brown with microsetae. Eyes: AER recurved, PER procurved, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances:AME 0.04, ALE 0.06, PME 0.05, PLE 0.05, AME–AME 0.02, PME–PME 0.04, AME– ALE, 0.02, PME–PLE 0.04, AME–PME 0.04, ALE–ALE 0.22, PLE–PLE 0.25, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 2.12 (0.63, 0.71, 0.42, 0.36), II 2.02 (0.62, 0.65, 0.40, 0.35), III 1.73 (0.51, 0.54, 0.37, 0.31), IV 2.26 (0.68, 0.77, 0.45, 0.36). TmI 0.62 and TmIV 0.64. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-1-1. Opisthosoma 1 long, 0.74 wide, oval, brownish black, ventral side brownish black.
Epigyne( Figs247A–D View FIGURE 247 ):Ventralplate(VP)sclerotized, narrow posteriorly; dorsal plate (DP) rectangular, wider than long; copulatory opening (CO) present mid ventrally at the junction of dorsal and ventral plate; copulatory ducts (CD) simple, fused at the beginning, forming long loop before entering the spermathecae; spermathecae (S) small, round; fertilization ducts (FD) short, extending mesally.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Hunan Province, Fig. 315 View FIGURE 315 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |