Bathyphantes pseudogracilis Irfan, Zhang & Peng

Irfan, Muhammad, Zhou, Gu-Chun, Peng, Xian-Jin & Zhang, Zhi-Sheng, 2025, Survey of Linyphiidae spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from some Oriental Regions of China, Megataxa 15 (1), pp. 1-248 : 18-19

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.15.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14985172

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD8788-8D2A-FFDB-4AD1-CE52A97CF93F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bathyphantes pseudogracilis Irfan, Zhang & Peng
status

sp. nov.

Bathyphantes pseudogracilis Irfan, Zhang & Peng , sp. n.

(IJNJḚDze)

Figures 17–19 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 , 315 View FIGURE 315

Types. Holotype ♂ ( HNU–HN– IV–1718 ), CHINA, Hunan Prov.: Ningxiang Co., Huaminglou Town, Tanzi Vill ., 28.032005°N, 112.640872°E, 72 m, 09.V.2017, G.C. Zhou et al. leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 1♀, with same data as for holotype GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Ningxiang Co., Huaminglou Town, Shili Vill. , 28.09017°N, 112.66843°E, 146 m, 09.V.2017, G.C. Zhou et al. leg. ( HNU–HN– IV–1702 ) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific name is based on the similarity of most morphological characteristics of the new species to those of B. gracilis (Blackwall, 1841) .

Diagnosis. Bathyphantes pseudogracilis sp. n. resembles B. gracilis , and B. parvulus in having a similar paracymbium in male palp and epigyne with similar scape in females ( Figs 17A–C View FIGURE 17 , 18A View FIGURE 18 ; Roberts 1987, figs 70b, c), but can be distinguished by the tibia species 1.6 times longer than wide in B. pseudogracilis sp. n. ( Figs 17A–C View FIGURE 17 ; vs. as long as wide in B. gracilis ); embolus semicircular in B. pseudogracilis sp. n. ( Figs 17A–C View FIGURE 17 ; vs. almost forming a complete circle in B. gracilis ). Female can be distinguished by the globular spermathecae in B. pseudogracilis sp. n. ( Figs 18A–C View FIGURE 18 ; vs. elongated in B. gracilis and C-shaped in B. parvulus ).

Description. Male (holotype, Figs 19A, B View FIGURE 19 ): Total length: 1.72. Carapace 0.78 long, 0.66 wide, the cephalic region slightly elevated, yellowish brown, fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.18 high. Chelicerae with four promarginal and two retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, brown, with microsetae. Eyes: AER recurved, PER straight and slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.08, AME–AME 0.02, PME–PME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.04, PME–PLE 0.06, ALE–ALE 0.33, PLE–PLE 0.36, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 5.87 (1.61, 1.76, 1.62, 0.88), II 4.7 (1.28, 1.42, 1.24, 0.76), III 3.05 (0.89, 0.92, 0.76, 0.48), IV 4.13 (1.23, 1.29, 1.07, 0.54). Tibial spine formula: 2-2-2-2. TmI 0.69 and TmIV absent. Opisthosoma 0.94 long, 0.52 wide, oval, dorsally grey with distinct pattern of alternative greenish patches extending posteriorly; lateral sides black, ventral side greenish, mid ventrally with broad grey patch.

Palp ( Figs 17A–D View FIGURE 17 ): Femur unmodified, almost longer than patella, tibia and cymbium. Patella almost as long as tibia, ventrally grooved. Tibia conic, with two retrolateral and i dorsal trichobothria. Cymbium unmodified, retrolateral margin with small projection; paracymbium (PC) sclerotized, U-shaped; tegulum (T) with a prominent bulge on ectal side; distal suprategular apophysis (DSA) simple, slightly curved with blunt end. Median membrane (MM) extending out through the base of embolic plate and thread-like projections on prolateral surface of apical portion; embolic plate (EPL) highly sclerotized, broad; dorsal projection of embolic plate (DPE) slightly touches the cymbium in prolateral view; anterior projection of embolic plate (APE) thick with blunt end, ventral process of embolic plate (VPE) slightly curved; embolus (E) gradually narrowed to end, slightly curved, not forming transverse loop at distal end.

Female (paratype, Figs 19C, D View FIGURE 19 ): Total length: 2.09. Carapace 0.78 long, 0.62 wide, the cephalic region slightly elevated, pale, fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.16 high. Chelicerae with five promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Sternum longer than wide, dark brown, with microsetae.Eyes:AER recurved, PER straight and slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.07, AME–AME 0.03, PME–PME 0.04, AME–ALE, 0.03, PME–PLE 0.04, ALE–ALE 0.29, PLE–PLE 0.31, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 4.34 (1.15, 1.44, 1.09, 0.66), II 3.68 (1.08, 1.17, 0.93, 0.5), III 2.55 (0.78, 0.79, 0.59, 0.39), IV 3.5 (1.03, 1.12, 0.82, 0.53). Tibial spine formula: 2-2-2-2. TmI 0.59 and TmIV absent. Opisthosoma 1.31 long, 0.83 wide, oval, all other morphological characters same as in male except darker in color.

Epigyne ( Figs 18A–C View FIGURE 18 ): Ventral plate (VP) simple, broad, scape (SC) wider than long, posterior end round; parmula (P) short, globular; copulatory ducts (CD) forming 2 loops before joining the spermathecae; spermathecae (S) large, present anteriorly on dorsal plate, pointing away from each other; fertilization ducts (FD) extending mesally.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Hunan Province, Fig. 315 View FIGURE 315 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Linyphiidae

Genus

Bathyphantes

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF