Dinematocricus aff. faucium Brölemann, 1913

Golovatch, S. I., Mauriès, J. P. & Akkari, N., 2021, On the collections of Indo-Australian Spirobolida (Diplopoda) kept in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University, Russia. 3. Some Rhinocricidae, Arthropoda Selecta 30 (1), pp. 3-27 : 15

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.30.1.01

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15556603

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C587E3-FFE4-5874-5FDC-4A45FD4FF9CD

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Dinematocricus aff. faucium Brölemann, 1913
status

 

Dinematocricus aff. faucium Brölemann, 1913 View in CoL

Figs 53–76 View Figs 53–56 View Figs 57–60 View Figs 61–64 View Figs 65–68 View Figs 69–74 View Figs 75–80 .

Dinematocricus faucium Brölemann, 1913: 129 View in CoL , original description from the ♂ holotype from Thursday Island , Torres Strait Islands, Queensland, Australia.

MATERIAL. 11 ♂♂, 13 ♀♀, 3 ♀♀ juv. ( ZMUM), Papua New Guinea, Trobriand Archipelago , Kiriwina Island, 24.I.1977, G.F. Kurcheva leg.

DESCRIPTION. Adults mostly ca. 85–120 mm long and 8.5–11.5 wide (♂, ♀), with 53–59p+T segments (♂, ♀), presumed subadults 53–78 mm long and 5–6 mm wide, with 45p+4ap+T, 53p+3ap+T or 55 p+3ap+T segments. A single deviant ♂ ca. 52 mm in length, ca. 5.5 mm in width, with 47p+4ap+T segments (see below). Colouration grey-brown to brown, pattern indistinctly cingulate due to darker brown metazonae and distinctly cingulate due to yellowish or light brown prozonae ( Figs 53–60 View Figs 53–56 View Figs 57–60 ). Collum sometimes narrowly flavous along anterior margin ( Fig. 53 View Figs 53–56 ). Epiproct often similarly flavous dorsally ( Figs 56 View Figs 53–56 , 60 View Figs 57–60 ) Epiproct ( Fig. 46 View Figs 42–50 ) uniformly dark brown like head. Legs light to dark grey-brown. Presumed juveniles mostly greyish. Eye patches usually blackish brown, in adults each composed of 36–45 ommatidia arranged in 6–8 vertical rows.

All characters as in Propodobolus sp. , except as follows.

Tegument smooth and shining, mostly very delicately vermiculate. Interantennal isthmus ca. 2x diameter of antennal socket. Collum broadly and regularly rounded laterally, anterior and lateral margins, as well as caudolateral corner clearly, but narrowly bordered. Midbody segments/rings faintly striate to striolate, more densely and clearly so ventrad, striations on dorsum above ozopore level completely obliterate. Scobinae present, starting with ring 8 and traceable at least until last few segments: inconspicuous, paramedian, narrow, lunular pits separated from each other by ca. 3x their own width, each with a small posterior field ( Figs 54 View Figs 53–56 , 59 View Figs 57–60 ). Ozopores small, inconspicuous disks, starting with ring 6, each pore lying upon line/suture both just before metazona and longitudinal line. Numerous light and irregular spots/ sigilla on internal surface of meso- and metazonae. Epiproct small, faintly concave near proximal third in lateral view, flattened dorsoventrally. Paraprocts very clearly swollen along caudal margin ( Figs 56 View Figs 53–56 , 60 View Figs 57–60 ).

Legs ca. 1/2 (♂) or 1/3 (♀) as long as body height; distinct sole pads present only on ♂ tarsi, gradually reduced towards posterior body third. ♂ coxae 3–5 swollen ventrally ( Fig. 58 View Figs 57–60 ), a spine each above and below claw.

Gonopods ( Figs 61–66 View Figs 61–64 View Figs 65–68 ). Anterior gonopods with a strong, central, distally broadened and apically narrowly rounded, sternal process (s), the latter being much longer/higher than both coxa (cx) and telopodite (t) with its small, apical, rounded, caudolateral process (tp); cx stout, with a moderate, elongate, mesal, subtriangular projection (mp), t more slender than cx. Posterior gonopods consisting of a shorter, relatively stout, subcylindrical coxa and a slender, much longer, bipartite telopodite; apicolateral branch (lb) the longest,>3x as long as a similarly flagelliform solenomere (sl).

REMARKS. Among the ♂♂ in the above series the smallest one (length ca. 52 mm, width ca. 5.5 mm, with 47p+4ap+T segments) superficially looks much the same as the others ( Figs 69–74 View Figs 69–74 ), but the ♂ sole pads are missing, the scobinae are only ca. 2x apart from each other and show better developed posterior fields ( Fig. 70 View Figs 69–74 ), whereas the gonopods ( Figs 67, 68 View Figs 65–68 , 71–74 View Figs 69–74 ), both anterior and posterior, differ in the central sternal process (s) of the anterior gonopods being slightly bifid, club-shaped and considerably shorter than the telopodite (t), the medial projections (mp) of the coxite (cx) are relatively more prominent, and the entire posterior gonopod is much shorter. This sole ♂ may prove to belong to a different species, but given the entire body of evidence, including the smallest body size, the increased number of apodous segments, the absence of sole pads, the clearly shortened posterior gonopods etc., on balance we tend to regard that deviant ♂ as abnormal and somewhat underdeveloped, perhaps premature, and thus it seems conspecific with the other material. The development of most Spirobolida being hemianamorphotic, that of the gonopods in some members has long been known to be gradual [ Mauriès, 1980; Enghoff et al., 1993; Bond et al., 2003], in D. aff. faucium likely getting modified at least between certain prematuration moults (cf. above under D. aff. bionus ).

Among the other variable characters, we can mention a lighter, rather vague dorsal spot on the dorsal side of the epiproct that is noticeable in several specimens. Carl [1918] distinguished that morph as the variety fulvosignatus , from an unspecified place in New Guinea, in which that light spot was clear. This variety still remains such and has no status in the nomenclature.

Some of the features of D. faucium which Attems [1914] recorded from samples from the mainland of eastern Papua New Guinea differed from the original description so significantly that Jeekel [2001] suggested that they belonged to a species other than D. faucium . We believe that until more comparative material becomes available for study, the identity of the Kiriwina material is bound to remain but provisional. According to Brölemann [1913], the holotype from an island off Queensland, Australia was 112 mm long, 9.5 mm wide, with 54p+1ap+T segments, blackish brown with red-brown cingula along the caudal margins of metazonae and a bright brown-red telson; scobinae are present on segment 8 to about 36 th, separated from each other by about 1.5x their diameter and each showing a posterior field; the anal valves are bordered near the caudal margin; and ♂ tarsi are devoid of sole pads. The anterior gonopods, however, are exactly the same as in Figs 61, 62 View Figs 61–64 , 65 and 66 View Figs 65–68 .

ZMUM

Zoological Museum, University of Amoy

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Diplopoda

Order

Spirobolida

Family

Rhinocricidae

Genus

Dinematocricus

Loc

Dinematocricus aff. faucium Brölemann, 1913

Golovatch, S. I., Mauriès, J. P. & Akkari, N. 2021
2021
Loc

Dinematocricus faucium Brölemann, 1913: 129

Brolemann H. W. 1913: 129
1913
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF