Didiclis flaccida (Bory) Li Bing Zhang & X.M. Zhou, 2024
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.664.2.9 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14947537 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87A8-AF55-FFC1-FF04-52A59DD803C9 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Didiclis flaccida (Bory) Li Bing Zhang & X.M. Zhou |
| status |
comb. nov. |
Didiclis flaccida (Bory) Li Bing Zhang & X.M. Zhou , comb. nov.
Basionym: Lycopodium flaccidum Bory (1833: 9) .
Type: INDIA. Mahé, sur la terre, dans les lieux ombragés et humides, C.P. Bélanger s.n. (holotype P00677428 ! ; isotype WAG1901915 ! ).
Distribution. India (Maharashtra, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Goa) ( Shalimov et al. 2024).
Notes: Didiclis flaccida has long been treated as a synonym of D. delicatula (Desvaux ex Poiret in Lamark 1814: 554) Li Bing Zhang & X.M. Zhou in Zhou & Zhang (2023: 664) by Alston (1934a, b) and accepted by Zhang et al. (2013), Fraser-Jenkins et al. (2017). Shalimov et al. (2024) found that the two species differ from each other in leaf morphology and micromorphological features of mega- and microspores and their distinction was corroborated by molecular evidence. We here accept their treatment and recognize D. flaccida .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Didiclis flaccida (Bory) Li Bing Zhang & X.M. Zhou
| Hu, Yu-Ping, Zhang, Li-Bing & Zhou, Xin-Mao 2024 |
Lycopodium flaccidum
| Bory 1833: 9 |