Mugil setosus Gilbert, 1892
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5053.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:295D03A4-589A-4E3F-B030-5121EF7D7398 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5603652 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE87D6-FFCA-FFEE-98EA-FE60F977333C |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Mugil setosus Gilbert, 1892 |
| status |
|
Mugil setosus Gilbert, 1892 View in CoL .
Liseta Mullet. Because the previous reported maximum length record, 91 cm ( 15.8 in) TL ( McEachran and Fechhelm 1998), likely represents Mugil curema , the maximum size of this species is unclear. The largest specimen in the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Fish Collection is 39 cm ( 15.4 in) SL. Mission Creek, Santa Barbara County, southern California (Camm Swift, pers. comm. to M.L.) to Chile (Harrison in Fischer et al. 1995), including Gulf of California ( Robertson and Allen 2002), and Islas Galápagos ( Grove and Lavenberg 1997). Shallow marine, brackish, and fresh waters (Harrison in Fischer et al. 1995, Argulo et al. 2020); depth: surface (nightlight; Personal communication: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Fish Collection, La Jolla, California), intertidal to 25 m ( 82 ft) (min.: Thomson and Lehner 1976; max.: Amezcua Linares 1996). We note that Britzke et al. (2019) determined that fish identified as “ Mugil curema Valenciennes, 1836 ” from the eastern Pacific are, in fact, Mugil setosus Gilbert, 1892 . Their work, and that of Menezes et al. (2015), limit the geographic range of M. curema to the western South Atlantic. Further research ( Neves et al. 2020) suggests that Mugil curema is a species complex.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
