Suberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf052 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD942D-FF97-517C-E95E-FA7EFB7DC6F7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Suberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870 |
status |
|
Suberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870 View in CoL
• Suberites lütkenii Schmidt (1870) , von Marenzeller (1886), Topsent (1913), Hentschel (1929), Burton (1934), Alander (1942), de Laubenfels (1953), Morozov et al. (2023).
• Suberites montalbidus Carter (1880 View in CoL , 1882), Fristedt (1885, 1887), Levinsen (1893), Lambe (1894, 1900), Swartschewsky (1906), Morozov et al. (2019).
• Suberites spec. Vosmaer (1882).
• Suberites domuncula var. ficus Koltun (1959) View in CoL .
Material analysed: R / V Sevastopol 19 August 1960, Gulf of St. Lawrence, coll. Nesis K.N., st. 3147 (trawl 219), 46.67°N, 59.4°W, 318–320 m, one specimen GoogleMaps , ZISP 13689 View Materials . Motorboat Clione in June 2023, White Sea, coll. Novikov A.A.: 66.3°N, 33.8°E, one specimen GoogleMaps , KFUWS1 . R / V Vilnus in August 2023, Barents Sea, coll. Khacheturova K.S., st. 35, 69.34666667°N, 38.81°E, 147 m, 3.37°C, 34.522 psu, one specimen GoogleMaps , KFULH48 . R / V Prof. Boiko in September 2023, Barents Sea, coll. Strelkova N.A.: st. 31, 68.20543333°N, 39.60551667°E, 95 m, 7.3°C, two specimens GoogleMaps , KFULH49 , KFULH50 ; st. 46, 68.24341667°N, 39.73548333°E, 126 m, 7.63°C, one specimen, KFULH53 ; st. 52, 68.40363333°N, 40.37541667°E, 84 m, one specimen, KFULH57 ; st. 54, 68.42213333°N, 40.20763333°E, 71 m, one specimen, KFULH58 ; st. 64, 68.37958333°N, 39.56826667°E, 76 m, 6.5°C, two specimens, KFULH59 , KFULH60 ; st. 65, 68.36911667°N, 39.4627°E, 81 m, 6.8°C, one specimen, KFULH61 ; st. 67, 68.31066667°N, 39.3266°E, 117 m, 6.8°C, two specimens, KFULH62 , KFULH63 ; st. 68, 68.36021667°N, 39.362°E, 104 m, 6°C, one specimen, KFULH64 ; st. 77, 68.41466667°N, 39.05811667°E, 90 m, 6.8°C, three specimens, KFULH65 , KFULH66 , KFULH67 ; st. 79, 68.46776667°N, 39.08108333°E, 94 m, 6.8°C, one specimen, KFULH70 ; st. 80, 68.46533333°N, 38.92278333°E, 106 m, 5.4°C, one specimen, KFULH72 ; st. 81, 68.51375°N, 38.9243°E, 103 m, 5.4°C, four specimens, KFULH73 , KFULH74 , KFULH75 , KFULH76 ; st. 108, 68.35091667°N, 39.30106667°E, 106 m, 6.71°C, one specimen, KFULH84 . R / V Vilnyus in March 2024, Barents Sea, coll. Kudryashova A.S. and Strelkova N.A., st. 131, 71.99833333°N, 49.01°E, 128 m, −0,15°C, 34.714 psu, fourspecimens GoogleMaps , KFULH85 , KFULH86 , KFULH87 , KFULH88 ; st. 158, 72.66166667°N, 50.335°E, 142 m, 2.2°C, two specimens, KFULH89 , KFULH90 . ZMMU SCUBA-diving and tidal collections, August 2024, White Sea, coll . WSBS diver team, site 1, 66.521017°N, 33.184518°E, 15 m, eight specimens, WS24241, WS24242, WS24243, WS24244 GoogleMaps ; site 2, 66.543209°N, 33.185838°E, 1 m, two specimens, WS24162, WS24163; site 3, 66.5534167°N, 33.1046111°E, 0.1 m, three specimens, WS24164, WS24165.
Morphology: Barents and White Sea specimens of S. luetkenii analysed in this study grow atached to bivalve shells [e.g. Chlamys islandica (Müller, 1776) and Astarte borealis (Schumacher, 1817) ], on pebbles or rock surfaces ( Fig. 6 and Fig. 7). Te growth form typically is fig-shaped, with a welldefined peduncle; sometimes irregularly massive, cushionshaped, encrusting. In the later case, the base is tightly atached to the object on which the sponge grows. Te colour in life is pale orange or pale yellow. Preserved specimens are beige. Surface velvety, ofen slightly wrinkled. Sponge is firm, cork-like to touch in some cases, elastic and flexible in others. Usually, one to three oscula surrounded by a short spicular collar (not always) open at the top.
Some specimens grow out from the substratum, typically a bivalve shell, to become flat, lobate. Generally, these sponges appear to lie flat on the sea botom when in situ, rather than growing vertically. A few minute oscula scatered across the upper side. Sometimes there is a single wide osculum subdivided by septa. Lobate forms usually have an even outer surface in vivo; however, specimens with a more typical, wrinkled surface can also be found. Te consistency is elastic to touch.
Spicules: Megascleres are of two distinct types, choanosomal subtylostyles or ectosomal tylostyles, with overlapping size distributions ( Fig. 8). Choanosomal subtylostyles have only a slightly pronounced tyle near the basal end and are cylindrical in shape, straight or slightly curved, ofen long-pointed: 266–392.8–505 µm × 3.6–5.7–7.9 µm (N = 100). Small tylostyles have a distinctively pronounced head at the basal end and are cylindrical, short-pointed: 150–264–378 µm × 3.3–4.95–7.4 µm (N = 100). In some specimens, large centrotylote oxeas can be found.
Microscleres are minutely spined centrotylote microrhabds of three types. Tese spicules, except microtrongyles, can seem to be completely smooth, even under high magnification (×400). Microstrongyles, ~30 µm (N = 50); microxeas, ~50 µm (N = 50); microstyles, ofen rare, ~30 µm.
Skeleton: Te main skeleton consists of large subtylostyles, either as individual spicules or in bundles, which are scatered in a disorderly fashion or form a vague mesh. In the ectosome, small tylostyles are arranged into radial bundles, with the apical ends of the spicules slightly protruding beyond the surface. Microscleres are scatered throughout the interior but are especially abundant in the outermost layers.
Remarks: It was suggested earlier, by Morozov et al. (2023), that S. luetkenii might represent a species complex. In this study, we defined several distinct morphotypes in the Barents Sea population of S. luetkenii : a fig-shaped morph with a wrinkled surface as opposed to a lobose and flat morph with a smooth surface. However, the analysis of the 28S nuclear and COI mitochondrial loci from two morphotypes proved that they are conspecific; no differences were found in barcoding regions.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
ZMMU |
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Suberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870
Morozov, Grigori, Ereskovsky, Alexander & Strelkova, Natalia 2025 |
Suberites domuncula var. ficus
Koltun 1959 |
Suberites montalbidus
Carter 1880 |
Suberites lütkenii
Schmidt 1870 |