Indian
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3349984 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:04AA7D11-C6F0-4A27-8635-1D9B7362CA04 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B2FD6D-FFAA-FFED-18B8-7ADB57E9FD90 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Indian |
status |
|
Indian Diopsidae records based on misidentifications
A substantial number of Diopsidae were erroneously reported from India. Bigot (1892: 215) recorded two purely Afrotropical species D. circularis and D. ichneumonea and also D. westwoodii from Java. Van der Wulp (1897: 171) reported the Afrotropical Diopsis trentepohlii Westwood , but later (Van der Wulp 1899: 53) withdrew this record. Brunetti (1907: 165) recorded Teleopsis longiscopium Rondani from “ India ”, but this was a location in present-day Myanmar. It was anyway a misidentification. Curran (1936: 2) reported Diopsis ferruginea Röder from Mergui, India, but this is now in southern Myanmar. Shillito (1940: 156) stated that this was a misidentification and that it concerned Cyrtodiopsis currani Shillito. Teleopsis ferruginea (Röder) is anyway a species only occurring in Sri Lanka. Several papers ( Datta & Biswas 1985: 219; Mitra et al. 2015: 59) reported the Java species C. dalmanni for India. Datta & Biswas (1985: 220) and Datta & Parui (1999: 31) reported the Philippines species E. subnotata from India. M. quadriguttata (as Teleopsis ) was recorded by Datta & Biswas (1985: 221) and Mitra et al. (2015: 59). Sharma (1988: 143) reported the Afrotropical rice stem-borer D. longicornis (as D. thoracica ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.