Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2025.2468673 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17005626 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A987D1-FFC5-3A14-9F91-0A259658FC37 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875 |
status |
|
Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875 View in CoL
See Winterton et al. (2019, fig. 19); Martins and Price (2020, figs. 12–21).
Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875, p. 181 View in CoL ; Okamoto, 1905: 115; Matsumura, 1908: 39: Navás, 1912: 421; Nakahara, 1914a: 493; 1914b: 516, 1915: 333; Hayashi, 2005: 389; Winterton et al., 2019: 38; Martins and Price, 2020: 18; Iwanami et al., 2021: 369. Type locality: Japan (‘Yokohama’ and ‘Kobé’).
Plethosmylus hyalinatus Krüger, 1913: 205 View in CoL ; Navás, 1924: 223; 1928: 90; Kuwayama, 1936: 109; 1953: 179, 1954: 95, 1956: 79, 1962: 343; Hirai, 1955: 269; 1956b: 58.
Osmylus (Osmylus) hyalinatus Makarkin, 1985: 39 View in CoL , 1990: 37, 1995: 44; Sekimoto and Yoshizawa, 2011: 9.
Diagnosis
Head yellow; vertex convex; antennae dark brown to black. Pronotum dark brown with a yellow brand median. Fore wing hyaline, without dots; sometimes apex with indistinct transverse marking. Process of male tergum 9 short triangular. Male gonocoxites 9 with two pairs of tubercles, in same size, subtriangular. Female sternum 7 without processes; with anterior branch of tergum 9 short. Spermatheca simple and relatively elongate.
Material examined
JAPAN: 1♂, Honshu, Sugadaira Kogen [菅平高原], 28 .VII .2019,leg . Jishen Wang ( CAU) . SOUTH KOREA: 1♀, Gyeongsang, Mt . Cheondeung-san, 24 .VII .2016, leg . Ding Yang ( CAU); 1♀, Jeollanam-do, Hwasun-sun, Changpleng-myeon, Guksebon , 22 .VIII .2017,leg . Ding Yang ( CAU) .
Distribution
Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu), Russia (Kuanshir Island).
Remarks
This species is similar to O. wenii sp. n., O. xiaohongae sp. n. and O. zheanus , but there is a significant genetic distance among these species ( Table 2). It can be distinguished from O. wenii sp. n. by the absence of dots on the fore wing, while in O. wenii sp. n. there are some dots at fore wing apex, outer gradate series and distal part of M. It differs from O. xiaohongae sp. n. by having a shorter anterior branch of female tergum 9, whereas O. xiaohongae sp. n. has a long anterior branch. It is distinguished from O. zheanus by the absence of processes on female sternum 7, while O. zheanus has three processes on the female sternum 7.
CAU |
China Agricultural University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875
Li, Zechuan, Zheng, Yuchen, Wang, Yongjie & Liu, Xingyue 2025 |
Osmylus (Osmylus) hyalinatus
Sekimoto S & Yoshizawa K 2011: 9 |
Makarkin VN 1990: 37 |
Makarkin VN 1985: 39 |
Plethosmylus hyalinatus Krüger, 1913: 205
Kuwayama S 1962: 343 |
Kuwayama S 1956: 79 |
Hirai H 1956: 58 |
Hirai H 1955: 269 |
Kuwayama S 1954: 95 |
Kuwayama S 1953: 179 |
Kuwayama S 1936: 109 |
Navas L 1928: 90 |
Navas L 1924: 223 |
Kruger L 1913: 205 |
Osmylus hyalinatus
Martins CC & Price B 2020: 18 |
Winterton SL & Martins CC & Makarkin VN & Ardila-Camacho A & Wang YJ 2019: 38 |
Nakahara W 1915: 333 |
Nakahara W 1914: 493 |
Nakahara W 1914: 516 |
Navas L 1912: 421 |
Matsumura S 1908: 39 |
Okamoto H 1905: 115 |
McLachlan R 1875: 181 |