Pachybrachis nubilus, Bowditch, 1909
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-75.2.485 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C6EC7D54-CC92-4010-8B8E-BD36E53465D3 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17642056 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A75F65-6B22-FFF4-9296-C73BFE50FA74 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Pachybrachis nubilus |
| status |
|
2. PACHYBRACHIS nuBIluS Bowditch, 1909
( Figs. 3 View Fig , 4 View Fig , 6 View Fig )
Pachybrachys nubilus Bowditch 1909: 312 ; Fall 1915: 444 (taxonomy).
Pachybrachis nubilus : Riley et al. 2003: 161 (catalog).
Pachybrachis conspirator Fall 1915: 445 . New synonymy.
Pachybrachis conspirator : Riley et al. 2003: 156 (catalog).
Type. Bowditch (1909) described P. nubilus from two Arizona males and a female from Utah. One of the males, hereby designated lectotype, labeled “ ♂ // Bill Williams Fork / Ariz. Sept. [printed, white paper] // TYPE / F. C. B. Coll. [printed, pink paper] // TYPE [printed] / 8765 [hand-inked, red paper] // P. nubilus BW / Type [hand-inked, white paper // [circular blue disc signifying dissection by RJB] // LECTOTYPE / Pachybrachys / nubilus Bowditch / R. J. Barney 2020 [printed, red paper]”, was examined, dissected, and photographed ( Figs. 3A–D View Fig ). The other male, now a paralectotype due to the above lectotype designation, labeled “ ♂ // Bill Williams Fork / Ariz. Sept. [hand-inked, white paper] // So. Arizona / F. H. Snow [printed, white paper] // P. nubilus Bowd. [hand-inked] / Det. H. C. Fall. [printed, white paper with black-lined border] // [circular blue disc signifying dissection by RJB] // PARALECTOTYPE / Pachybrachys / nubilus Bowditch / R. J. Barney 2020 [printed, yellow paper]”, was examined, dissected, and photographed ( Figs. 3E–F View Fig ). The female, labeled “ St. George / Utah, July / Wickham [printed, white paper]”, was characterized by Fall (1915) as “almost certainly identical” and cannot be confirmed as P. nubilus with complete confidence.
Fall (1915) described P. conspirator from four specimens of unknown locality in Arizona. The lone male in the Fall type collection, hereby designated lectotype, labeled “Ariz [printed, white label] // Coll / Schaeffer [printed, white paper] // ♂ // TYPE / conspira - / tor [hand-inked, white paper] // M.C.Z. / Type [printed] / 24927 [hand-inked, red paper] // [circular blue disc signifying dissection by RJB] // LECTOTYPE / Pachybrachys / conspirator Fall / R. J. Barney 2020 [printed, red paper]”, was examined, dissected, and photographed ( Fig. 4 View Fig ).
Redescription. Male. Yellow, pale brown punctate, elytra often with brown maculation ( Figs. 3 View Fig , 4 View Fig ); L = 3.11–3.25 mm (mean = 3.17 mm, n = 4); W = 1.55–1.59 mm (mean = 1.57 mm, n = 4); L/W = 2.56–2.68 (mean = 2.63, n = 4). Head: Distinctly wider than thoracic apex, HW = 1.12–1.25 mm (mean = 1.17 mm, n = 4); IOD = 0.27–0.34 mm (mean = 0.30 mm, n = 4); IOD/HW = 0.31–0.38 (mean = 0.34, n = 4); face yellow with thin brown macula descending from vertex to between eyes; ocular lines wanting; antenna not reaching elytral declivity. Pronotum: Yellow, M-shaped macula broadly diffuse to almost imperceptible, three basal spots often well defined; incomplete punctation, side margins smooth; PL = 0.91–1.03 mm (mean = 0.96 mm, n = 4); PW = 1.30–1.39 mm (mean = 1.35 mm, n = 4); PL/PW = 0.90–0.96 (mean = 0.92, n = 4). Elytra: Yellow, baso-sutural punctation confused, striae mostly regular, five and six much confused, punctures brown, standard maculae brown, diffuse to wanting. Pygidium: Yellow, with base, a median and two side spurs black. Venter: Black, upper sides of last ventrites yellow. Legs: Yellow, front claws not enlarged. Genitalia: Median lobe in en-face view rectangular, with very prominent terminus extended from “level” DEO ( Fig. 3E View Fig ). In lateral view the edge of lobes is sinuous to the extended terminus, with a small rounded keel or knob near base. Four males from Arizona were dissected.
Female. As in male, except, L = 3.32–3.51 mm (mean = 3.41 mm, n = 2); W = 1.76–1.78 mm (mean = 1.77 mm, n = 2); L/W = 2.42–2.60 (mean = 2.51, n = 2); HW = 1.35–1.43 mm (mean = 1.39 mm, n = 2); IOD = 0.44–0.48 mm (mean = 0.47 mm, n = 2); IOD/HW = 0.40–0.47 (mean = 0.44, n = 2).
Remarks. Fall’s (1915) speculation that P. conspirator “is not at all unlikely that this is only an extreme form of nubilus ” rings true. The very pronounced terminus arising from a somewhat “flat” DEO is distinctive. In en-face view, the median lobe of P. nubilus appears as a more extreme version of P. laevis .
Distribution. Riley et al. (2003) reported P. nubilus from Arizona, Utah, and Mexico. Riley et al. (2003) reported P. conspirator from Arizona. The female P. nubilus identified from Kansas would appear to be an outlier ( Fig. 6 View Fig ).
Specimens Examined. Lectotypes, paralectotypes + 1 specimen. USA: ARIZONA: Mohave Co., Bill Williams Fork, ix, F. H. Snow [ 1♂, nubilis LECTOTYPE, MCZ-BOW; 1♂, det. H. C. Fall nubilus, SEMC ]; unknown county, Ariz., Schaeffer [ 1♂, conspirator LECTOTYPE, MCZ-FALL]; same data, except M. L. Linell [ 1♂ 1♀, Fall 1915 Revis conspirator PARATYPES, USNM]. KANSAS: Douglas Co., F. H. Snow [ 1♀, det. H. C. Fall nubilus, SEMC ].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Cryptocephalinae |
|
Genus |
Pachybrachis nubilus
| Barney, Robert J. 2021 |
Pachybrachis conspirator
| Fall 1915: 445 |
Pachybrachys nubilus
| Bowditch 1909: 312 |
